Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 99, Issue 17, November 2008, Pages 7941-7953
Bioresource Technology

Review
Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.061Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of biological and thermochemical conversion (TCC) technologies in livestock waste-to-bioenergy treatments can provide livestock operators with multiple value-added, renewable energy products. These products can meet heating and power needs or serve as transportation fuels. The primary objective of this work is to present established and emerging energy conversion opportunities that can transform the treatment of livestock waste from a liability to a profit center. While biological production of methanol and hydrogen are in early research stages, anaerobic digestion is an established method of generating between 0.1 to 1.3 m3 m−3 d−1 of methane-rich biogas. The TCC processes of pyrolysis, direct liquefaction, and gasification can convert waste into gaseous fuels, combustible oils, and charcoal. Integration of biological and thermal-based conversion technologies in a farm-scale hybrid design by combining an algal CO2-fixation treatment requiring less than 27,000 m2 of treatment area with the energy recovery component of wet gasification can drastically reduce CO2 emissions and efficiently recycle nutrients. These designs have the potential to make future large scale confined animal feeding operations sustainable and environmentally benign while generating on-farm renewable energy.

Introduction

With the massive consolidation of confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) over the past decades, there is a need for new, state-of-the-art waste management systems that make animal operations economically viable and environmentally benign. In addition to the potential environmental threat traditional waste management systems pose (McNab et al., 2007, Stone et al., 1998, Szogi et al., 2006), there are rising energy prices and concerns over petroleum supplies. Thus, there is expanded interest in on-site biofuel production. Bringing biofuel production to the farm-scale provides an opportunity for the agricultural sector to reduce their reliance on imported fossil fuels while improving the soil, water, and air quality (Muller et al., 2007). Currently, animal production annually provides 35 million dry tons of sustainable biomass/manure feedstock that comprises 18% of the total available sustainable biomass from the US agricultural lands (Perlack et al., 2005, Ro et al., 2007). The use of animal manure and other organic-based waste products as bioenergy feedstocks for waste-to-bioenergy conversion processes would allow farmers to take advantage of new markets for traditional waste products. In effect, livestock waste-to-bioenergy treatments have the potential to convert the treatment of livestock waste from a liability or cost component into a profit center that can: (1) generate annual revenues; (2) moderate the impacts of commodity prices; and (3) diversify farm income.

Two basic platforms exist for converting organic biomass – the biochemical (biological) and thermochemical platforms (Fig. 1). Within these platforms are treatment processes that can be designed to solve odor problems, reduce volume, recover inherent nutrients, decrease pollution potential, as well as recover energy from the manure. As discussed by McKendry, 2002a, McKendry, 2002b, when selecting a conversion process, economics and both the available feedstock’s quantity and characteristics are important factors. In most instances, the desired energy form of the final end-product is the overriding factor. The end-products from each conversion process can be placed into three main groups: heat and power generation; transportation fuels; and chemical intermediates (Cantrell et al., 2007, McKendry, 2002a, McKendry, 2002b).

Biochemical conversion processes are defined by the US Department of Energy as the use of living organisms or their products to convert organic material to fuels (USDOE, 2002). These conversion processes can be realized by both anaerobic and photosynthetic microorganisms to produce gaseous and liquid fuels. Many times, the solid/slurry-phase residual by-product from these processes is nutrient-rich and can serve as an alternative fertilizer. The thermochemical platform is a physical conversion of biomass using high temperatures to break the bonds of organic matter and reform these intermediates into synthesis gas, hydrocarbon fuels, and/or a charcoal residual (Bridgwater, 2003, Cantrell et al., 2007, McKendry, 2002a, McKendry, 2002b). While the biological-based conversion processes require an extended amount of reaction time (days, weeks or even months), thermochemical conversion processes (TCC) can quickly (seconds or minutes) yield multiple complex end-products (Bridgwater, 2006). Consequently, the short residence time requirement of TCC drastically reduces the footprint requirements. Thermochemical conversion processes include combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and liquefaction. Combustion converts manure’s energy into heat; however, this method does not provide a way to store the energy until it is needed. Additionally, the ash product from combustion has yet to find a suitable recycle use. As such, pyrolysis and gasification have received the most attention because they have more versatility.

In this paper, we reviewed currently available biological and thermochemical conversion technologies that can be applied to produce bioenergy while treating livestock wastes. We also suggested a biological–thermal hybrid system concept that appears to treat livestock wastes while at the same time reduce greenhouse gas emissions and produce bioenergy.

Section snippets

Biological conversion

This section intends to examine several biochemical conversion processes that are either established or emerging technologies. Waste-to-bioenergy technologies involving biological treatment of livestock waste have been dominated by anaerobic digestion with full-scale production of combustible biogas. Less known and reported at laboratory-scale has been the use of photobiologic microorganisms like algae and fermentative processes for production of bio-hydrogen. Even less known is the biological

Thermochemical conversion (TCC)

Thermochemical conversion (TCC) is a high-temperature chemical reforming process that breaks apart the bonds of organic matter and reforms these intermediates into char, synthesis gas and highly oxygenated bio-oil. In addition to TCC being a mass consumer of a manure’s organic portion that extracts all available energy, TCC processing has a number of other benefits and advantages: (1) small footprint; (2) efficient nutrient recovery; (3) no fugitive gas emissions; (4) short processing time on

Bio-thermochemical opportunities

Carbon dioxide is a major component in the product gases from anaerobic digestion and thermochemical conversion processes. Since an increased atmospheric concentration of CO2 is considered one of the main causes of global warming (Schneider, 1989), it is important to recover CO2 to limit short-term release. By naturally fixing atmospheric CO2 via photosynthesis ten times more efficiently than terrestrial plants (Usui and Ikenouchi, 1997), algae can rapidly generate both algal biomass and

Conclusions

In this paper, we reviewed multiple livestock waste-to-bioenergy processes to help combat rising energy prices and reduce the environmental threats from traditional livestock waste management practices. The biochemical process of anaerobic digestion is an established technology capable of biogas production; however, other biological processes like bio-hydrogen and bio-methanol production are still in early research stages and show promise to become a sustainable, renewable energy resource.

References (157)

  • M. Dogru et al.

    Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainty analysis

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2002)
  • A. Dominguez et al.

    Investigations into the characteristics of oils produced from microwave pyrolysis of sewage sludge

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2005)
  • A. Dominguez et al.

    Production of bio-fuels by high temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge using conventional and microwave heating

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2006)
  • A. Dominguez et al.

    Hydrogen rich fuel gas production from the pyrolysis of wet sewage sludge at high temperature

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.

    (2006)
  • Y. Dote et al.

    Recovery of liquid fuel from hydrocarbon-rich microalgae by thermochemical liquefaction

    Fuel

    (1994)
  • H.H.P. Fang et al.

    Phototrophic hydrogen production from acetate and butyrate in wastewater

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2005)
  • J. Frenz et al.

    Hydrocarbon recovery by extraction with a biocompatible solvent from free and immobilized cultures of Botryococcus braunii

    Enzyme Microb. Tech.

    (1989)
  • T. Furuto et al.

    Semicontinuous methanol biosynthesis by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b

    J. Mol. Catal. A- Chemical

    (1999)
  • M.L. Ghirardi et al.

    Microalgae: a green source of renewable H2

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2000)
  • J.H. Hahn et al.

    Immobilized algal cells used for hydrogen production

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2007)
  • D. He et al.

    Hydrogen photosynthesis by Rhodobacter capsulatus and its coupling to PEM fuel cell

    J. Power Sources

    (2005)
  • A. Hirano et al.

    Temperature effect on continuous gasification of microalgal biomass: Theoretical yield of methanol production and its energy balance

    Catal. Today

    (1998)
  • S. Hirata et al.

    Carbon dioxide fixation in batch culture of Chlorella sp. using a photobioreactor with a sunlight-collection device.

    J. Ferment. Bioeng.

    (1996)
  • S. Inoue et al.

    Analysis of oil derived from liquefaction of Botryococcus braunii

    Biomass Bioenerg.

    (1994)
  • E. Johnson et al.

    Carbon trading: time for industry involvement

    Environ. Int.

    (2004)
  • I.K. Kapdan et al.

    Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials

    Enzyme Microb. Tech.

    (2006)
  • K. Karim et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Waste strength versus impact of mixing

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2005)
  • D.R. Kashyap et al.

    Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions: a review

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2003)
  • H. Koku et al.

    Aspects of metabolism of hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2002)
  • H. Koku et al.

    Kinetics of biological hydrogen production by the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U. 001

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2003)
  • S. Koutcheiko et al.

    Preparation and characterization of activated carbon derived from the thermo-chemical conversion of chicken manure

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2007)
  • J.J. Lay et al.

    Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • D.B. Levin et al.

    Biohydrogen production: Prospects and limitations to practical application

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2004)
  • T.M. Liang et al.

    Behavioral study on hydrogen fermentation reactor installed with silicone rubber membrane

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2002)
  • I.M. Lima et al.

    Granular activated carbons from broiler manure: Physical, chemical and adsorptive properties

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2005)
  • I. Lima et al.

    Utilization of turkey manure as granular activated carbon: Physical, chemical and adsorptive properties

    Waste Manage.

    (2005)
  • T.O. Matsui et al.

    Liquefaction of micro-algae with iron catalyst

    Fuel

    (1997)
  • P. McKendry

    Energy production from biomass (part 2): Conversion technologies

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2002)
  • P. McKendry

    Energy production from biomass (part 3): Gasification technologies

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2002)
  • J.A. Menendez et al.

    Microwave-induced drying, pyrolysis and gasification (MWDPG) of sewage sludge: Vitrification of the solid residue

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.

    (2005)
  • X. Miao et al.

    Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil

    Bioresource Technol.

    (2006)
  • X. Miao et al.

    Fast pyrolysis of microalgae to produce renewable fuels

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.

    (2004)
  • Y. Mu et al.

    Evaluation of three methods for enriching H2-producing cultures from anaerobic sludge

    Enzyme Microb. Tech.

    (2007)
  • M.J. Antal et al.

    The art, science, and technology of charcoal production

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2003)
  • F. Ayala et al.

    Animal waste media for Spirulina production

    Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl.

    (1984)
  • F. Ayala et al.

    Experiments on Spirulina culture on waste-effluent media and at the pilot plant

    Hydrobiologia

    (1987)
  • Beddoes, J.C., Bracmort, K.S., Burn, R.B., Lazarus, W.F., 2007. An analysis of energy production costs from anaerobic...
  • A.A. Boateng et al.

    Bench-scale fluidized-bed pyrolysis of switchgrass for bio-oil production

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2007)
  • T. Bridgwater

    Biomass for energy

    J. Sci. Food. Agr.

    (2006)
  • C. Bullock

    Australians test greenfuel algae biofuel process

    Ind. Bioprocess.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (499)

    • Enzymatic biomethanol production: Future perspective

      2023, Sustainable Materials and Technologies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text