Kinetic study of MCM-41 synthesis☆
Introduction
In 1992, Mobil scientists [1], [2] have reported the synthesis of new mesostuctured materials called MCM (obil rystalline aterials). Hexagonal (MCM-41), cubic (MCM-48) and lamellar (MCM-50) structures have been identified. Among these phases, MCM-41 is the most studied. The synthesis of pure silica mesoporous molecular sieves consists of the condensation and polymerization of an inorganic source of silicium around the micelles of surfactant.
According to Mobil scientists, MCM-41 is formed via a LCT (iquid rystal emplating) mechanism [1], whereas for Monnier et al. [3], MCM-41 is obtained from the transformation of the lamellar MCM-50 phase. Kind of surfactants, silicium/surfactant ratio, the alkyl chain length of surfactant, pH value, hydrothermal synthesis time and temperature are known to affect the pore diameter, the wall thickness and the structure of the final compound. Generally, quaternary ammonium salts, CnH2n+1(CH3)3NBr, are used as surfactants. Beck and coworkers [1] have investigated the effect of the surfactant chain length variation and the silicium/surfactant ratio on the MCM-41 synthesis. They concluded that MCM-41 is synthesized when n varied from 6 to 16 and the pore diameter is proportional to the alkyl chain length (+2.5 Å per carbon), with a CTMABr/silicium molar ratio less than one. Elder et al. [4] showed that the optimum pH value is about 9–10. However, in literature few studies concerning the influence of physical parameters such as synthesis time and temperature of the micellar gel has been made. Cheng et al. [5] have studied the effect of temperature and time on the synthesis, they have shown the results contrary to those made by Monnier et al. [3] that hexagonal MCM-41 phase is already present at the beginning of the synthesis made at 100 and 150°C, and the yield is maximum after 48–72 h synthesis. At 150°C the hexagonal phase is transformed into the lamellar or the amorphous phase after 96 h. For longer reaction times, the amorphous phase is the major product.
This work deals with a systematic study on the effect of heating time and temperature on the MCM-41 synthesis, on the pore size and thickness of walls separating two pores of materials obtained.
Section snippets
Synthesis
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide was dissolved in water at 40°C to obtain a clear micellar solution. Then sodium silicate was added to this solution and the pH value was adjusted with sulfuric acid. pH value and surfactant/silicium molar ratio were fixed at 10 and 0.62 according to literature [6]. After stirring for several hours at room temperature, the homogenous gel was sealed in Teflon autoclaves and heated. The synthesis temperature and time vary respectively from 80°C to 140°C and from few
X-ray diffraction analysis
Fig. 1 reports the XRD patterns of materials obtained at 80°C (Fig. 1A), 100°C (Fig. 1B), 120°C (Fig. 1C) and 140°C (Fig. 1D) at different synthesis times. It has been reported [8] that X-ray diffractogramms of powder MCM-41 material exhibit a typical four peaks pattern with a very strong feature at a low angle (100 reflection line) and three another weaker peaks at a higher angle (110, 200 and 210 reflection lines). The absence of the last three peaks suggests the disordered structure of
Conclusion
An optimization of MCM-41 synthesis conditions led us to propose the mechanism. Different synthesis steps, which are detected in the synthesis of zeolites, have been clearly observed. Referred to the different steps of zeolites synthesis, we describe these steps in the formation of MCM-41 materials with the following terms, step I: hydrolysis and condensation of silica source, step II: polycondensation of silica source around the cylindrical micelles, step III: the increase in the wall
Acknowledgements
This work has been performed within the framework of PAI/IUAP 4-10. Gontran Herrier thanks FNRS (Fond National de la Recherche Scientifique, Belgium) for a FRIA scholarship.
References (15)
- et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1992) - et al.
Nature
(1992) - et al.
Science
(1993) - et al.
Chem. Mater.
(1997) - et al.
J. Chem. Faraday Trans.
(1997) - et al.
Chem. Mater.
(1994) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1951)
Cited by (39)
A concise and systematic study of the hydrothermal synthesis of Si-MCM-48: Structural aspects and mechanical stability
2021, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Thus, during the process of silica condensation in hydrothermal treatment, a contraction of the micelle occurred due to the strong interaction of CTA+ and the superficial siloxy groups (SiO−) on the walls, producing condensed materials with smaller diameter mesopores compared to the micellar diameters of free lyotropic crystals in solution [34,64]. Importantly, when silica condensation occurs, temperature and the time are fundamental parameters affecting the structure phase formed [28,65]. Syntheses conducted at higher temperatures and longer times led to greater condensation of the silica and, when these conditions occurred, three effects were observed: a) disassembly of micelles, leading to interlayered organic-inorganic lamellar structures; b) redissolution of silica; and c) exudation of micelles from the mesopores in formation, leading to an amorphous phase or, after very long periods, quartz.
Heterogeneous complexes of nickel MCM-41 with β-diimine ligands: Applications in olefin oligomerization
2015, Journal of CatalysisCitation Excerpt :Scanning electron microscopy was performed with the aim of evaluating the morphology of the materials before and after anchoring of the ligands, which is shown in Fig. 6. We can observe the morphology of the particle agglomerates with irregular sizes, which are usually observed in MCM-41 [41]. After anchoring of the L1 and L2 ligands, no change in the morphology of the material is observed.
Solubilization of decane into gemini surfactant with a modified Jeffamine backbone: Design of hierarchical porous silica
2013, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsInvestigation of properties of mesoporous silica materials based on nonionic fluorinated surfactant using Box-Behnken experimental designs
2013, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsCitation Excerpt :These materials are mainly obtained from the addition of an inorganic precursor to a micellar solution of surfactant in water through a cooperative templating mechanism (CTM) [1,2,9–12] and it is possible to control the nanostructure and/or the textural properties by choosing the appropriate template [13–21]. In addition to the surfactant properties, the parameters which govern the chemistry of the inorganic precursor such as the hydrothermal treatment temperature and duration, the quantity of silica source or the pH also influence the characteristics of the recovered materials [22–32]. Regarding the potential applications of the mesoporous materials one challenge is to increase their hydrothermal stability.
Alcohols solubilization in a nonionic fluorinated surfactant based system: Effect on the mesoporous silica characteristics
2012, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceSystematic investigation of the synthesis parameters driving the preparation of mesoporous materials using a nonionic fluorinated surfactant
2012, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
- ☆
Paper presented at the First International Conference of Inorganic Materials, Versailles, France 16–19 September, 1998.