ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Tectonophysics
Volume 118, Issues 3-4, 1 October 1985, Pages 257-279
Quantification of Earthquake
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1691 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0040-1951(85)90125-8    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1985 Published by Elsevier B.V.

The present status of reservoir induced seismicity investigations with special emphasis on Koyna earthquakesstar, open

Harsh K. Guptaa

aCentre for Earth Science Studies, Trivandrum 695 010 India

Accepted 28 February 1984. 
Available online 22 April 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The status of Reservoir Induced Seismicity (RIS) has been reviewed periodically (Rothé, 1968, 1973; Gupta and Rastogi, 1976; Simpson, 1976; Packer et al., 1979). In the present paper, the significant work carried out during the last three years on RIS is reviewed.

An earthquake of magnitude Image occurred on November 14, 1981 in the vicinity of Aswan Lake, Egypt, 17 years after the filling started in 1964. This event occurred 4 days after the seasonal maximum in the reservoir water level and was followed by a long sequence of aftershocks. Another event of magnitude Image occurred in the vicinity of Aswan Lake on August 20, 1982. Results of preliminary investigations indicate that this seismic activity is reservoir induced. Recent analyses of induced seismic events at Nurek Reservoir U.S.S.R., show that the second stage of filling during August to December 1976, increasing the maximum depth from 120 m to 200 m, was accompanied by an intense burst of shallow seismic activity. An outward migration from the centre of the reservoir, possibly associated with diffusion of pore pressure, is revealed by the temporal distribution of earthquake foci. A variety of investigations including the in situ measurement of tectonic stress, pore pressure, permeability, distribution of faults, etc., in addition to monitoring seismicity, have been undertaken in the vicinity of the Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina. The largest reservoir induced earthquake is predicted not to exceed magnitude 5.

The Koyna Reservoir, India, continues to be the most outstanding example of RIS. Three earthquakes of magnitude Image 5 occurred in September 1980. Earthquakes of magnitude 4 occur frequently in the vicinity of Koyna, the latest being on February 5, 1983. Events that occurred during the period 1967–1973 have been relocated using better procedures and are found to be much shallower and the epicentres less diffused. Location of 12 earthquakes of Ms greater-or-equal, slanted 4.0, their foreshocks and aftershocks, that occurred during 1973–1976, composite focal mechanism solutions and related studies are consistent with the delineation of a N-S trending fault through the reservoir area. In a couple of interesting studies it has been demonstrated that earthquakes of magnitude greater-or-equal, slanted 5.0 in the Koyna region are usually preceded by several magnitude greater-or-equal, slanted 4 earthquakes in the preceding fortnight. Also, a rate of loading of Koyna reservoir of at least 40 ft/week appears to be a necessary, although not sufficient, condition for the occurrence of magnitude greater-or-equal, slanted 5 earthquakes. Smooth filling/emptying appears to be the key to reduce the hazard of RIS.

A map and a table of the reported cases of reservoir induced changes in seismicity through 1982 have been compiled.


Tectonophysics
Volume 118, Issues 3-4, 1 October 1985, Pages 257-279
Quantification of Earthquake
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.