ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Lingua
Volume 99, Issues 2-3, July 1996, Pages 55-83
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (2076 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0024-3841(96)00005-8    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Article

Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems*1

William Badecker

Department of Cognitive Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2685, USA

Available online 26 February 1999.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Linguistic and psycholinguistic research over the last decade has provided a wide array of evidence indicating that the mental representations of spoken word forms are highly structured objects. One prominent aspect of the enriched notion of phonological structure is that the representation of segmental length (quantity) is separate from that of segmental identity; and another is that segmental sequences are organized into prosodic constituents. This paper discusses data from acquired dysgraphia which suggest that certain attributes of phonological forms also hold of orthographic forms as well — including the skeletal representation of quantity and the grouping of segments into syllabic constituents. E.g., the geminate letters ee and tt in orthographic forms like career and butter are represented and processed as single graphemic objects that are associated with two CV units on a tier that encodes quantity. It is argued that such properties of phonological and orthographic form reflect general conditions imposed on lexical representation, and not modality-specific representational constraints.

Article Outline

• References

Lingua
Volume 99, Issues 2-3, July 1996, Pages 55-83
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.