Skip to main content
Log in

FACTORS SHAPING STUDENTS’ OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN ARGUMENTATIVE ACTIVITY

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity are shaped by the teacher, the class, and the mathematical topic. It compares the argumentative activity between two classes taught by the same teacher using the same textbook and across two beginning algebra topics—investigating algebraic expressions and equivalence of algebraic expressions. The study comprises two case studies in which each teacher taught two 7th grade classes. Analysis of classroom videotapes revealed that the opportunities to engage in argumentative activity with the topic investigating algebraic expressions were similar in each teacher's two classes. By contrast, substantial differences were found between one teacher's classes with regard to the opportunities to engage in argumentative activity with the topic equivalence of algebraic expressions. The discussion highlights how the interplay between the characteristics of the mathematical topic, the characteristics of the class, and the characteristics of the teacher contributed to the shaping of students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400.

  • Ayalon, M. & Even, R. (2010). Mathematics educators’ views on mathematics learning and the development of deductive reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1131–1154.

  • Ayalon, M. & Even, R. (2014). Students' Opportunities to Engage in Transformational Algebraic Activity in Different Beginning Algebra Topics and Classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9498-5

  • Balacheff, N. (1999). Is argumentation an obstacle? Invitation to a debate. International newsletter on the teaching and learning of mathematical proof. Retrieved from: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED435644.pdf

  • Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351–382.

  • Douek, N. (1999). Argumentation and conceptualization in context: a case study on sunshadows in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. & Even, R. (2009). Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two classes taught by the same teacher. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 152–170). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. & Even, R. (2011). Enacted types of algebraic activity in different classes taught by the same teacher. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 867–891.

  • Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of function. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105–121.

  • Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K. & Brown, C. A. (1998). ‘You’re going to want to find out which and prove it’: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527–548.

  • Haggarty, L. & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Lubienski, S. T. & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: the importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J. & Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures 42(1) (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  • Manouchehri, A. & Goodman, T. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M.V. & Pedemonte, B. (2014). Relationship between inductive arithmetic argumentation and deductive algebraic proof Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(1), 125–149.

  • Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H. Jepson, C. & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90(4), 339–363.

  • Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and Learning. In Muller-Mirza and A-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education – Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 91–126). New York: Springer Verlag.

  • Smith, J. P. & Phillips, E. A. (2000). Listening to middle school students’ algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(3), 156–161.

  • Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A. & Lee, H. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussion: warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247–261.

  • Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analysing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423–440.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Ayalon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayalon, M., Even, R. FACTORS SHAPING STUDENTS’ OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN ARGUMENTATIVE ACTIVITY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 575–601 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3

Key words

Navigation