ABSTRACT
This paper explores the nature and source of mathematics homework and teachers’ and students’ perspectives about the role of mathematics homework. The subjects of the study are three grade 8 mathematics teachers and 115 of their students. Data from field notes, teacher interviews and student questionnaire are analysed using qualitative methods. The findings show that all 3 teachers gave their students homework for instructional purposes to engage them in consolidating what they were taught in class as well as prepare them for upcoming tests and examinations. The homework only involved paper and pencil, was compulsory, homogenous for the whole class and meant for individual work. The main source of homework assignments was the textbook that the students used for the study of mathematics at school. ‘Practice makes perfect’ appeared to be the underlying belief of all 3 teachers when rationalising why they gave their students homework. From the perspective of the teachers, the role of homework was mainly to hone skills and comprehend concepts, extend their ‘seatwork into out of class time’ and cultivate a sense of responsibility. From the perspectives of the students, homework served 6 functions, namely improving/enhancing understanding of mathematics concepts, revising/practising the topic taught, improving problem-solving skills, preparing for test/examination, assessing understanding/learning from mistakes and extending mathematical knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, H. J. & Epstein, J. L. (1982). Parent involvement: A survey of teacher practices. Elementary School Journal, 83, 85–102.
Chang, A. S. C., Kaur, B., Koay, P. L. & Lee, N. H. (2001). An exploratory analysis of current pedagogical practices in primary mathematics classrooms. The NIE Researcher, 1(2), 7–8.
Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C. & Pattall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.
Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 27–30.
Epstein, J. L. & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181–193.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (paperbackth ed.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
González, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M. & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practice in mathematics. Journal of Education of Students Placed at Risk, 6, 115–132.
Hallam, S. (2004). Homework: The evidence (bedford Way Papers). London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Hong, E. & Milgram, R. M. (2000). Homework: Motivation and learning preference. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C. & Burrow, R. (1995). Parents’ reported involvement in students’ homework: Parameters of reported strategy and practice. Elementary School Journal, 95, 435–450.
Kaur, B. & Low, H.K. (2009). Student perspective on effective mathematics pedagogy: Stimulated recall approach study. Final research report. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
Kaur, B. & Yap, S. F. (1997). Kassel project report (NIE—Exeter Joint Study) second phase (October 1995–June 1996). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Kaur, B., Koay, P. L. & Yap, S. F. (2001). IPMA report (NIE—Exeter Joint Study). Year two (January–December 2000). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Kaur, B., Yap, S. F. & Koay, P. L. (2004). The learning of mathematics—expectations, homework and home support. Primary Mathematics, 8(3), 22–27.
Lee, J. F. & Pruitt, K. W. (1979). Homework assignments: Class games or teaching tools? Clearing House, 53, 31–35.
Ma, X. (1996). The effects of cooperative homework on mathematics achievement of Chinese high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 379–387.
MacBeath, J. & Turner, M. (1990). Learning out of school: Homework, policy and practice. Glasgow, UK: Jordanhill College of Education.
Mulhenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B. & Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295–317.
Mullis, V. S. I., Martin, M. O. & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.
Quigley, M. (2003). Educational baggage: The case of homework. REACT, 22(1), 1–15.
Tam, V. C. W. (2009). Homework involvement among Hong Kong primary school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(2), 213–227.
Van Voorhis, F. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family involvement and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 323–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KAUR, B. MATHEMATICS HOMEWORK: A STUDY OF THREE GRADE EIGHT CLASSROOMS IN SINGAPORE. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 187–206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9237-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9237-0