Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Student Understanding of Outcomes Involving Two or More Dice

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from 154 interviews with students in grades 3 to 13 were analyzed to suggest a developmental progression of conceptual understanding associated with the sample space for two ordinary six-sided dice tossed simultaneously. The model was then considered in the light of responses to an extension task involving three six-sided dice with four sides painted black and two white. Forty-five of the interviews were longitudinal interviews of students 3 or 4 years after the original interviews, allowing for analysis of change in levels of understanding across time. This study suggests some of the intuitions and understandings that form the intermediate steps to a complete understanding of outcomes for two dice, as well as documenting the conceptual regression likely to occur when a more difficult task is encountered. Links to previous research, including well-known misconceptions, and educational implications of the model are among the discussion points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, G.S. & Williams, J.S. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Carlton, VIC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council. (1994). Mathematics: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. & Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. (2001). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, K.F. & Biggs, J.B. (1991). Developmental determinants of qualitative aspects of school learning. In G. Evans (Ed.), Learning and teaching cognitive skills (pp. 185–207). Hawthorn, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and the Arts. (1993). Pack 5: Chance and data mathematics guidelines K-8. Hobart, Tas.: Curriculum Services Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? An exploratory research study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 28, 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Nello, M.S. & Marino, M.S. (1991). Factors affecting probability judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.R. (1982). Probability concepts in 11–16 year old pupils. Report of research sponsored by the Social Science Research Council. Loughborough: CAMET, University of Technology.

  • Jones, G.A. (1974). The performances of first, second and third grade children on five concepts of probability and the effects of grade, I.Q. and embodiments on their performances. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University.

  • Jones, G.A., Langrall, C.W., Thornton, C.A. & Mogill, A.T. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children’s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective Probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J. & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students’ reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2002). Misconceptions in probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.

  • Page, D.A. (1959). Probability. In H.P. Fawcett, A.M. Hach, C.W. Junge, H.W. Syer, H. van Egen & P.S. Jones (Eds.), The growth of mathematical ideas: Grades K-12 - 24th NCTM Yearbook (pp. 229–271). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. (L. Leake, Jr., P. Burrell, & H.D. Fishbein, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company. (original work published 1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha, L. & Thompson, P. (2002). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J.M. (1977). Misconceptions of probability: An experiment with a small-group activity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J.M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: NCTM & Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J.M., Watson, J., Moritz, J. & Reading C. (1999, April). School mathematics students’ acknowledgment of statistical variation. In C. Maher (Chair), There’s more to life than centers. Presession Research Symposium conducted at the 77th Annual National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Conference, San Francisco, CA.

  • Watson, J.M. (1994). Instruments to assess statistical concepts in the school curriculum. In National Organizing Committee (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Volume 1 (pp. 73–80). Rabat, Morocco: National Institute of Statistics and Applied Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.M., Collis, K.F. & Moritz, J.B. (1997). The development of chance measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.M. & Kelly, B.A. (2004). Expectation versus variation: Students’ decision making in a chance environment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 371–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.M. & Kelly, B.A. (2006). Expectation versus variation: Students’ decision making in a sampling environment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.M. & Moritz, J.B. (1998). Longitudinal development of chance measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.M., Moritz, J.B. (2003). Fairness of dice: A longitudinal study of students’ beliefs and strategies for making judgments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 270–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane M. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, J.M., Kelly, B.A. Development of Student Understanding of Outcomes Involving Two or More Dice. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 7, 25–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9071-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9071-1

Key words

Navigation