Skip to main content
Log in

Study of Stratus-Lowering Marine-Fog Events Observed During C-FOG

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two stratus-lowering marine fog events observed on 28 September and 4 October 2018 during the Coastal Fog (C-Fog) field campaign that took place offshore of eastern Canada from 1 September to 6 October 2018 are described. In situ, profiling, and remote sensing observations were made at selected land sites in eastern Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and aboard the research vessel Hugh R. Sharp cruising in adjoining coastal waters. Synoptic-scale analysis shows that both fog episodes result from the interaction between synoptic-scale surface-level low-pressure systems and a contiguous high-pressure system. At the same time, back trajectories reveal that the bulk of the fog layer is formed due to differential advection. The diameter of the fog droplets at the surface gradually decreases from the centre of the fog layer to its leading/trailing edges. The bimodal fog-droplet diameter distribution with peaks at 5–10 µm and 20–25 µm provide clues on droplet collision and coalescence processes. The observed difference between microphysical variables and droplet distribution between the two fog events and within the same fog layer might be governed by the atmospheric-boundary-layer (e.g., humidity conditions and turbulence) that prevailed in the fog layer. Overall, it is concluded that the life cycle of observed stratus-lowering coastal-fog episodes depends on synoptic conditions and atmospheric-boundary-layer characteristics such as stability, cloud-top cooling, and entrainment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JB (1931) Observations from airplanes of cloud and fog conditions along the southern California coast. Mon Weather Rev 59(7):264–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Arun SH, Chaurasia S, Misra A, Kumar R (2018) Fog Stability Index A novel technique for fog/low clouds detection using multi-satellites data over the Indo-Gangetic plains during winter season. Int J Remote Sens 39:8200–8218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel SL, Horna Muñoz DV, Grachev AA, Raghavendra K, Chamorro LP, Fernando HJS (2021) Fog formation related to gravity currents interacting with coastal topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00638-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Cramer J, Peters J (2002) Radiation fog: UPS Airlines conceptual models and forecast methods. In: Proceedings of 10th conference on aviation, range and aerospace meteorology, pp154–159

  • Bluestein HB (1992) Synoptic-dynamic meteorology in midlatitudes: Observations and theory of weather systems, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton WR, Bryan GH, van den Heever SC. (2010) Storm and cloud dynamics, Int. Geophys. Ser. Academic Press; second edition pp 820.

  • Dorman CE, Hoch SW, Gultepe I, et al. (2021). Large-scale synoptic systems and fog during the C-FOG field experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00641-1

  • Dupont JC, Haeffelin M, Protat A, Bouniol D, Boyouk N, Morille Y (2012) Stratus-fog formation and dissipation: a 6-day case study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Duynkerke PG (1999) Turbulence, radiation and fog in Dutch stable boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:447–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge RG (1971) The relationship between visibility and liquid water content in fog. J Atmos Sci 28:1183–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fochesatto GJ (2015) Methodology for determining multilayered temperature inversions. Atmos Meas Tech 8:2051–2060

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando HJS, Gultepe I, Dorman C, Pardyjak E, Wang Q, Hoch SW, Richter D, Creegan E, Gaberšek S, Bullock T, Hocut C, Chang R, Alappattu D, Dimitrova R, Flagg D, Grachev A, Krishnamurthy R, Singh DK, Lozovatsky I, Nagare B, Sharma A, Wagh S, Wainwright C, Wroblewski M, Yamaguchi R, Bardoel S, Coppersmith RS, Chisholm N, Gonzalez E, Gunawardena N, Hyde O, Morrison T, Olson A, Perelet A, Perrie W, Wang S, Wauer B (2021) C-FOG: life of coastal fog. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 102(2):E244–E272. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0070.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LE, Perkins JS, Meteorological techniques (1998), AFWA/TN-98/002, 242 p, online available at http://www.comptus.com/PDF/AFWA_TN_98-002.pdf

  • Goodman J (1977) The microstructure of California coastal fog and stratus. J Appl Meteorol 16:1056–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Heymsfield AJ, Lenschow DH (1990) A comparison of vertical velocity in cirrus obtained from aircraft and lidar divergence measurements during FIRE. J Atmos Ocean Technol 7:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I (1995) Physical, radiative, and dynamical processes within a night time marine stratus cloud. Pure Appl Geophys 144:321–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Isaac GA, Strawbridge KB (2001) Variability of cloud microphysical and optical parameters obtained from aircraft and satellite remote sensing measurements during RACE. Int J Climatol 21:507–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Müller MD, Boybeyi Z (2006) A new visibility parameterization for warm-fog applications in numerical weather prediction models. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45:1469–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Tardif R, Michaelides SC, Cermak J, Bott A, Bendix J, Müller MD, Pagowski M, Hansen B, Ellrod G, Jacobs W (2007) Fog research: a review of past achievements and future perspectives. Pure Appl Geophys 164:1121–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Milbrandt J (2007) Microphysical observations and mesoscale model simulation of a warm fog case during FRAM project. In: Gultepe I (eds) Fog and boundary layer clouds: fog visibility and forecasting. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser Basel, pp 1161–1178

  • Gultepe I, Pearson G, Milbrandt JA, Hansen B, Platnick S, Taylor P, Gordon M, Oakley JP, Cober SG (2009) The fog remote sensing and modeling field project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:341–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Isaac GA, Rasmussen RM, Ungar K (2011) A freezing fog/drizzle event during the FRAM-S project (No. 2011–38–0028). SAE Technical Paper

  • Gultepe I, Fernando HJS, Pardyjak ER, Hoch SW, Silver Z, Creegan E, Leo LS, Zhaoxia Pu, De Wekker SFJ, Hang C (2016) An overview of the MATERHORN fog project: observations and predictability. Pure Appl Geophys 173:2983–3010

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe I, Milbrandt JA, Zhou B (2017) Marine fog: a review on microphysics and visibility prediction. In: Koračin D, Dorman C (eds) Marine fog: challenges and advancements in observations, modeling, and forecasting. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Cham, pp 345–394.

  • Gultepe I, Fernando HJS, Pardyjak E, Wang Q, Creegan E, Hoch SW, Dorman C, Flagg DD, Yamaguchi R, Krishnamurthy R, Wagh S, Heymsfield AJ, Gaberše S, Perrie W, Perelet A, Chang R, Negare B, Wagh S (2021) A review of Coastal Fog Microphysics during C-FOG. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (accepted)

  • Holtslag MC, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AA (2010) Fog forecasting: “old fashioned” semi-empirical methods from radio sounding observations versus “modern” numerical models. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fog, Fog Collection and Dew Münster, Germany, 25–30 July 2010

  • Huang H, Liu H, Jiang W, Huang J, Mao W (2011) Characteristics of the boundary layer structure of sea fog on the coast of southern China. Adv Atmos Sci 28:1377

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Liu H, Huang J, Mao W, Bi X (2015) Atmospheric boundary layer structure and turbulence during sea fog on the southern China coast. Mon Weather Rev 143:1907–1923

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac GA, Bullock T, Beale J, Beale S (2020) Characterizing and predicting marine fog offshore newfoundland and labrador. Weather Forecast 35(2):347–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov O, Todorov P, Gultepe I (2020) Investigations on the influence of chemical compounds on fog microphysical parameters. Atmosphere 11(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK, Yum SS (2010) Local meteorological and synoptic characteristics of fogs formed over Incheon international airport in the west coast of Korea. Adv Atmos Sci 27:761–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK, Yum SS (2012) Marine boundary layer structure for the sea fog formation off the west coast of the Korean Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 169:1121–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK, Yum SS (2013) A study on the transition mechanism of a stratus cloud into a warm sea fog using a single column model PAFOG coupled with WRF. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 49:245–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK, Yum SS (2017) Turbulence in marine fog. In: Koračin D, Dorman C (eds) Marine fog: challenges and advancements in observations, modeling, and forecasting, Ch 4. Springer, Switzerland, pp 245–271 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45229-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koračin D, Lewis J, Thompson WT, Dorman CE, Businger JA (2001) Transition of stratus into fog along the California coast: observations and modeling. J Atmos Sci 58:1714–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Koračin D, Dorman CE, Lewis JM, Hudson JG, Wilcox EM, Torregrosa A (2014) Marine fog: a review. Atmos Res 43:142–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Koračin D (2017) Modeling and forecasting marine fog. In: Koračin D, Dorman C (eds) Marine fog: challenges and advancements in observations, modeling, and forecasting, Ch 9. Springer, Switzerland, pp 425–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45229-6_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leipper DF (1994) Fog on the US west coast: A review. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 75(2):229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JM, Koračin D, Rabin R, Businger J (2003) Sea fog off the California coast: viewed in the context of transient weather systems. J Geophys Res Atmos 108:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002833

  • Liu Y, Daum PH (2000) Spectral dispersion of cloud droplet size distributions and the parameterization of cloud droplet effective radius. Geophys Res Lett 27:1903–1906

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Daum PH, McGraw R (2004) An analytical expression for predicting the critical radius in the autoconversion parameterization. Geophys Res Lett 31:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Yang J, Niu S, Li Z (2011) On the evolution and structure of a radiation fog event in Nanjing. Adv Atmos Sci 28:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu CS, Liu YG, Niu SJ, Xue YQ (2018) Broadening of cloud droplet size distributions and warm rain initiation associated with turbulence: an overview. Atmosp Ocean Sci Lett 11:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack E J, Katz U, Rogers C, Pilié R (1974) The microstructure of California coastal stratus and fog at sea. Calspan Corp. Rep. CJ–5405-M-1, 74 pp.

  • Niu SJ, Liu DY, Zhao LJ, Lu CS, Lü JJ, Yang J (2012) Summary of a 4-year fog field study in northern Nanjing, Part 2: fog microphysics. Pure Appl Geophys 169:1137–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DA, Lewellen WS, Williamson GG (1978) The interaction between turbulent and radiative transport in the development of fog and low-level stratus. J Atmos Sci 35:301–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagowski M, Gultepe I, King P (2004) Analysis and modeling of an extremely dense fog event in southern Ontario. J Appl Meteorol 43:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Petterssen S (1938) On the causes and the forecasting of the California fog. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 19(2):49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilié RJ, Mack EJ, Rogers CW, Katz U, Kocmond WC (1979) The formation of marine fog and the development of fog-stratus systems along the California coast. J Appl Meteorol 18:1275–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Podzimek J (1997) Droplet concentration and size distribution in haze and fog. Stud Geophys Geod 41:277–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JD, Lane S, Boutle IA, Smith DKE, Bergot T, Lac C, Duconge L, McGregor J, Kerr-Munslow A, Pickering M, Clark R (2018) LANFEX: a field and modeling study to improve our understanding and forecasting of radiation fog. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 99:2061–2077

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruppacher H, Klett J (1997) Microphysics of clouds and rainfall. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15(13):1609–1625

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter DH, Veron F (2016) Ocean spray: an outsized influence on weather and climate. Phys Today 69:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolph G, Stein A, Stunder B (2017) Real-time environmental applications and display system: READY. Environ Modell Softw 95:210–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez KJ, Chen CL, Russell LM, Betha R, Liu J, Price DJ, Massoli P, Ziemba LD, Crosbie EC, Moore RH, Müller M (2018) Substantial seasonal contribution of observed biogenic sulfate particles to cloud condensation nuclei. Nat Sci Rep 8(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel JK, Zieger P, Bukowiecki N, Hammer E, Weingartner E, Eugster W (2012) Evaluating the capabilities and uncertainties of droplet measurements for the fog droplet spectrometer (FM-100). Atmos Meas Tech 5:2237–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJ, Cohen MD, Ngan F (2015) NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(12):2059–2077

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang EJ, Fernando HJS (2001) Entrainment and mixing in stratified shear flows. J Fluid Mech 428:349

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolaki S, Haeffelin M, Lac C, Dupont JC, Elias T, Masson V (2015) Influence of aerosols on the life cycle of a radiation fog event. A numerical and observational study. Atmos Res 151:146–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Daum PH, Yum SS, Liu Y, Senum GI, Lu ML, Seinfeld JH, Jonsson H (2009) Observations of marine stratocumulus microphysics and implications for processes controlling droplet spectra: Results from the Marine Stratus/Stratocumulus Experiment. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011035

  • Wang S, Fernando HJS, Creegan E, Krishnamurthy R, Wainwright C , Wagh S, Yamaguchi R. (2021) Analysis of a coastal fog episode during C-FOG campaign, Boundary-Layer Meteorol (accepted)

  • Wærsted EG, Haeffelin M, Steeneveld GJ, Dupont JC (2019) Understanding the dissipation of continental fog by analyzing the LWP budget using idealized LES and in situ observations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 145:784–804

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1992) International meteorological vocabulary. WMO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau MK, Rogers RR (1996) A short course in cloud physics-3rd edition. Butterworth-Heinemann-Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Niu S, Zhang Y, Xu F (2013) Microphysical characteristics of sea fog over the east coast of Leizhou Peninsula, China. Adv Atmos Sci 30:1154–1172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project C-FOG was funded by the Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-18-1-2472 as a special multidisciplinary project. We thank the crew of the research vessel Hugh R. Sharp, Chief Scientist Edward Creegan and all other scientists on board. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the Department Of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC05-76RLO1830.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Wagh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagh, S., Krishnamurthy, R., Wainwright, C. et al. Study of Stratus-Lowering Marine-Fog Events Observed During C-FOG. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 181, 317–344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00670-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00670-w

Keywords

Navigation