Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive biology of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brood parasitic habits of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus have excited wonder, disbelief and speculation since the fourth century BC. Accurate knowledge of cuckoo biology, however, accumulated only slowly and mostly since 1700. The aim of this study is to review six main topics: (1) the placement of cuckoo eggs in host nests; (2) cuckoo ‘clutch’ size; (3) cuckoo egg characteristics, mimicry and rejection; (4) choice of hosts; (5) eviction of eggs and chicks; and (6) the reasons why cuckoos are brood parasites and are incapable of rearing their own young. Early errors in reporting cuckoo biology were often a consequence of poor or incomplete observations leading to erroneous interpretations. Many of the early observers were egg collectors who focussed almost exclusively on the egg-laying period, thus ignoring cuckoo chick biology. Major landmarks in cuckoo studies included the facts that: (1) cuckoo eggs often resembled those of their hosts (1760s) and that this mimicry was adaptive (1850s); (2) hosts sometimes evicted cuckoo eggs (1770s); (3) female cuckoos laid individually distinctive eggs and that specific cuckoo gentes may exist (1850s); and (4) although well recognised that cuckoo chicks were reared alone, prior to Jenner’s work in the 1780s female cuckoo parents were thought to either eat or evict the host eggs or young. Jenner’s results was more readily accepted in Britain than in Germany. Between 1700 and 1859, cuckoo brood parasitism was difficult to reconcile with the prevalent conceptual framework of physico-theology (later known as the argument from design). Thereafter, Darwin’s idea of natural selection provided a superior conceptual framework, which in conjunction with experimental testing of specific hypotheses has continued to advance our understanding of brood parasitism. Our knowledge of cuckoo biology is far from complete, however, and we predict that continuing research often incorporating new technologies will refine and extend our understanding of the cuckoo’s extraordinary biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altum B (1868) Der Vogel und sein Leben. Schöningh, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Altum B (1873) Forstzoologie, Bd. 2, Vögel. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez F (1994) A gens of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitizing rufous Bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. J Avian Biol 25:239–243. doi:10.2307/3677081

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez F (2000) Response to common cuckoo Cuculus canorus model egg size by a parasitized population of rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. Ibis 142:683–686. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04470.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez F (2003) Parasitism rate by the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus increases with high density of host’s breeding pairs. Ornis Fenn 80:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1815) The natural history of birds, vol 2. Offor, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1835a) What is the number of eggs laid by a cuckoo at one course of laying? Does it ever lay more than one egg in any one nest? Mag Nat Hist 8:289–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1835b) Has any correspondent ever found the egg or young of the cuckoo in a nest so situated that the parent cuckoo could not possibly sit upon the nest to deposit the egg? Mag Nat Hist 8:290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1835c) An introduction to the study of birds, or the elements of ornithology on scientific principles. Religious Tract Society, London

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E (2006a) Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:11–18. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0132-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft A (2006b) Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk 123:419–430. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[419:ERIMWA]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2007) First evidence of regular common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, parasitism on eastern olivaceous warblers, Hippolais pallida elaeica. Naturwissenschaften 94:307–312. doi:10.1007/s00114-006-0189-8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2008) Getting rid of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg: why do hosts delay rejection? Behav Ecol 19:100–107. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm102

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragon S, Møller AP, Soler JJ, Soler M (1999) Molecular phylogeny of cuckoos supports a polyphyletic origin of brood parasitism. J Evol Biol 12:495–506. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00052.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2002) In: DM Balme (ed) Historia animalium, vol 1, Books I–X. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Avilés JM, Møller AP (2003) Meadow pipit (Anthus pratensis) egg appearance in cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) sympatric and allopatric populations. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 79:543–549. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00208.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Møller AP (2004) How is host egg mimicry maintained in the cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)? Biol J Linn Soc Lond 82:57–68. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00311.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Åsmul M, Møller AP (2006) Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol 19:1901–1910. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01166.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP (2007) Environmental conditions influence egg color of reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus and their parasite, the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:475–485. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0275-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker ECS (1913) The evolution of adaptation in parasitic cuckoos′ eggs. Ibis 1913:384–398. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1913.tb06559.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker ECS (1923) Cuckoo eggs and evolution. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1923:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker ECS (1942) Cuckoo problems. Witherby, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus E (1853) Neue Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsgeschichte des Kuckucks, Cuculus canorus. Naumannia 3:307–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus E (1892) Das Leben der europäischen Kuckucke. Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabás L, Gilicze B, Takasu F, Moskát C (2004) Survival and anti-parasite defense in a host metapopulation under heavy brood parasitism: a source-sink dynamic model. J Ethol 22:143–151. doi:10.1007/s10164-003-0114-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Bártol I, Karcza Z, Moskát C, Røskaft E, Kisbenedek T (2002) Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry. J Avian Biol 33:420–425. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.02945.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechstein JM (1791) Gemeinnützige Naturgeschichte Deutschlands, Bd 2. Crusius, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (2008) The wisdom of birds. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn J (1989) Charles Waterton: traveller, conservationist. Bodley Head, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwall J (1824) Observations conducive towards a more complete history of the cuckoo. Memoirs Literary Phil Soc Manchester, end series 4:441–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth E (1835) Observations on the cuckoo. Mag Nat Hist 8:325–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm CL (1823) Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte aller europäischen Vögel. Schmid, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke ML, Davies NB (1988) Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335:630–632. doi:10.1038/335630a0

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke ML, Davies NB (1991) A failure to demonstrate host imprinting in the cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and alternative hypotheses for the maintenance of egg mimicry. Ethology 89:154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1991) Eggshell strength in cuckoos and cowbirds. Ibis 133:406–413. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04589.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland FT, Martin WCL, Kidd W (1859) Birds and bird life. Religious Tract Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance E (1922) The cuckoo’s secret. Sidgwick and Jackson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance E (1923) The Cuckoo’s egg laying. Auk 40:181–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance E (1940) The truth about the cuckoo. Country Life, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD (2001) Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:565–571. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C (2007a) Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J Evol Biol 20:1218–1222. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01308.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C (2007b) Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers. Naturwissenschaften 94:441–447. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0216-4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cichon M (1996) The evolution of brood parasitism: the role of facultative parasitism. Behav Ecol 7:137–139. doi:10.1093/beheco/7.2.137

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudon C (1955) Nouvelles observations sur Cuculus c. canorus Linné en Alsace. Oiseaux 25:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) The origin of species. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1872) The origin of species, 6th edn. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke ML (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80269-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke ML (1989a) An experimental-study of co-volution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224. doi:10.2307/4995

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke ML (1989b) An experimental-study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236. doi:10.2307/4996

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:673–678. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0346

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsen EA, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Øien IJ, Honza M (2001) Egg mimicry in cuckoos parasitizing four sympatric species of Acrocephalus warblers. Condor 103:829–837. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0829:EMICPF]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann H (1960) The parasitic weaverbirds. US Nat Mus Bull 223:1–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch JL (1733–1763) Vorstellung der Vögel Deutschlands. Birnstiel, Berlin. 3rd installment 1935 and 6th installment 1743 (on the cuckoo)

  • Gärtner K (2002) Kuckucksgeheimnisse und ihre Erforschung: Wie verschwinden die Eier aus dem Nest? Falke 49:232–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt L (1964) Die Ornithologen Mitteleuropas. Brühlsche, Giessen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HL, Sorenson MD, Marchetti K, Brooke ML, Davies NB, Nakamura H (2000) Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo. Nature 407:183–186. doi:10.1038/35025058

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer K (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 9. Akademische, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosse PH (1853) Popular British ornithology. Lovell Reeve, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2007) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:373–381. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3731

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:73–75. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0017

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilding L (1835) The species of birds in whose nests the cuckoo has been known to deposit its egg or eggs. Mag Nat Hist 8:288–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney JH (1899) The economy of the cuckoo. Trans Norfolk Norwich Nat Hist Soc 6:365–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WJ, Orians GH (1965) Evolution of brood parasitism in altricial birds. Condor 67:361–382. doi:10.2307/1365631

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinroth O (1922) Die Beziehung zwischen Vogelgewicht, Eigewicht, Gelegegewicht und Brutdauer. J Ornithol 70:172–276. doi:10.1007/BF02537515

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinroth O, Heinroth M (1926) Die Vögel Mitteleuropas. Bd. 1. Bermühlen, Berlin (Installment ‘Cuckoo’ 1926)

  • Herrick FH (1910) Life and behavior of the cuckoo. J Exp Zool 9:169–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt H (1930) Ein vergessener vogelkundlicher Schriftsteller des 16. Jahrhunderts. J Ornithol 78:269–273. doi:10.1007/BF01953323

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke GB (2001a) How are different common cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg morphs maintained? An evaluation of different hypotheses. Ardea 89:341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novák V, Čapek M, Mrlík V (2001b) How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength. A study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol 32:249–255. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320307.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Vogl W, Moksnes A et al (2002) Behaviour of female cuckoos Cuculus canorus in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying—a radio telemetry study. Anim Behav 64:861–868. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Grim T, Čapek M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2004a) Nest defence, enemy recognition and nest inspection behaviour of experimentally parasitized reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Bird Study 51:256–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Čapek M et al (2004b) Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol 22:175–180. doi:10.1007/s10164-004-0119-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Šicha V, Procházka P, Ležalová R (2006) Host nest defense against a color-dimorphic brood parasite: great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) versus common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). J Ornithol 147:629–637. doi:10.1007/s10336-006-0088-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM (2000) Monophyly and phylogeny of cuckoos (Aves, Cuculidae) inferred from osteological characters. Zool J Linn Soc 130:263–307. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb01632.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner E (1788) Observations on the natural history of the cuckoo. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 78:237–246. doi:10.1098/rstl.1788.0016

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse E (1832–1834) Gleanings in Natural History. Murray, London

  • Jourdain FCR (1925) A study of parasitism in the cuckoos. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1925:639–667

  • Karcza Z, Moskát C, Cherry MI, Kisbenedek T (2003) Experimental manipulation of intraclutch variation in the great reed warbler shows no effect on rejection of parasitic eggs. Ethology 109:15–22. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00839.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilham L (1973) Edward Jenner, pioneer student of two major ornithological problems. Auk 90:752–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 81:383–406. doi:10.1017/S1464793106007044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O, Brooke ML (2007) Brood parasitism in birds. In: Jamieson BGM (ed) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Aves. NHSP, Enfield, pp 327–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O, Davies NB (2002) The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:375–381. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1887

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O, Davies NB (2004) The evolution of egg size in the brood parasitic cuckoos. Behav Ecol 15:210–218. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) The brood parasites. In: Lack D (ed) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London, pp 82–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Landois H (1886) Westfalens Tierleben. Die Vögel in Wort und Bild, Schöningh

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Kilner RM (2007) Breeding site and host selection by Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis. Anim Behav 74:995–1004. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.028

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverkühn P (1891) Fremde Eier im Nest. Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Vögel, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm AK (1999) Brood parasitism by the cuckoo on patchy reed warbler populations in Britain. J Anim Ecol 68:293–309. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00286.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm AK (2000) Tests of phenotypic plasticity in reed warbler defences against cuckoo parasitism. Behav 137:43–60. doi:10.1163/156853900501863

    Google Scholar 

  • Liversidge R (1961) Pre-incubation development of Clamator jacobinus. Ibis 103:624. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1961.tb02466.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo host coevolution. Anim Behav 49:1185–1209. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0152

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottinger AJ (1776) Der Kukuk, auf eigene Erfahrung gegründete Nachrichten über die Natur-Geschichte dieses wunderbaren Vogels. König, Strassburg. Translation from the French edition 1775

  • Lovászi P, Moskát C (2004) Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behav 141:245–262. doi:10.1163/156853904322890843

    Google Scholar 

  • Makatsch W (1955) Der Brutparasitismus in der Vogelwelt. Neumann, Radebeul

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti K (2000) Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav 59:877–883. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FA (1789) Über die Naturgeschichte des Kukuks (von Jenner, E). Magazin für das Neueste aus der Physik u Naturgesch 65–60

  • Miller AH (1946) Social parasites among birds. Sci Mon 62:238–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A (1992) Egg recognition in chaffinches and bramblings. Anim Behav 44:993–995. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80597-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)—an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from european museum collections. J Zool (Lond) 236:625–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC (1990) Behavioral responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behav 116:64–89. doi:10.1163/156853990X00365

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT (1991) Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108:348–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH (2000) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142:247–258. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04864.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Skjelseth S, Stokke BG, Kleven O et al (2008) Individual female common cuckoos Cuculus canorus lay constant egg types but egg appearance cannot be used to assign eggs to females. J Avian Biol 39:238–241. doi:10.1111/j.2008.0908-8857.04158.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu G (1802) Ornithological dictionary. White, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Hauber ME (2007) Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn 10:377–386. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0071-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mudie R (1830) The British naturalist (2nd edn). Orr and Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann JF (1826) Naturgeschichte der Vögel Deutschlands, Bd 5 (Bearbeitet von JF Naumann). Fleischer, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann JF (1900–1901) Naturgeschichte der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Bd. 4 (Bearbeitet von R Blasius, E Rey u. a.). Köhler, Gera

  • Naumann JA, Naumann JF (1797) Naturgeschichte der Land- und Wasservögel, Bd 1. Aue, Leipzig Heft 6 mit Kapitel Kuckuck

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton A (1896) A Dictionary of Birds. A & C Black. London

  • Newton A (1902) Cuckoo. In Encyclopedia Britannica, 10th edn, Times, London

  • Øien IJ, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Evolution of variation in egg color and marking pattern in European passerines; adaptations in a coevolutionary arms-race with the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Behav Ecol 6:166–174. doi:10.1093/beheco/6.2.166

    Google Scholar 

  • Øien IJ, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Honza M (1998) Costs of Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism to Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. J Avian Biol 29:209–215. doi:10.2307/3677102

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphal WC (1805) Ornithologisches Handbuch für Forstmänner und Gartenfreunde. Keyser, Erfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas PS (1776) Naturgeschichte merkwürdiger Thiere. 6. Sammlung. Lange, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (1974) The evolution of clutch size and reproductive rates in parasitic cuckoos. Evolution 28:169–181. doi:10.2307/2407320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (1998) Brood parasitism in birds: strangers in the nest. BioScience 48:377–386. doi:10.2307/1313376

    Google Scholar 

  • von Pernau JFA (1702) Unterricht, was mit den lieblichen Geschöpff, denen Vögeln… Faksilime 1982, Naturmuseum Coburg

  • von Pernau JFA (1720) Angenehme Land-Lust allerhand Vögel zu fangen und ab zurichten. Monath, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Picman J, Pribil S (1997) Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs? J Ornithol 138:531–541. doi:10.1007/BF01651384

    Google Scholar 

  • Polačiková L, Honza M, Procházka P, Topercer J, Stokke BG (2007) Colour characteristics of the blunt egg pole: cues for recognition of parasitic eggs as revealed by reflectance spectrophotometry. Anim Behav 74:419–427. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Procházka P, Honza M (2003) Do common whitethroats (Sylvia communis) discriminate against alien eggs? J Ornithol 144:354–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Procházka P, Honza M (2004) Egg discrimination in the yellowhammer. Condor 106:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie J (1831) The architecture of birds. Knight, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1924) Zur Entstehung der Mimikry der Kuckuckseier. J Ornithol 72:461–472. doi:10.1007/BF01909702

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1925) Verhalten von Singvögeln bei Änderung des Geleges. Ornithol Monatsschr 33:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey E (1892) Altes und Neues aus dem Haushalte des Kuckucks. Freese, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey E (1894) Beobachtungen über den Kuckuk bei Leipzig aus dem Jahre 1893. Ornithol Monatsschr 19:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert M, Sorci G (2001) The evolution of obligate interspecific brood parasitism in birds. Behav Ecol 12:128–133. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.2.128

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Lotem A (1999) How to detect a cuckoo egg: a signal-detection theory model for recognition and learning. Am Nat 153:633–648. doi:10.1086/303198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Bicik V, Moskát C (2002a) Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts. Behaviour 139:613–628. doi:10.1163/15685390260136735

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Moskát C, Honza M (2002b) The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos. Behav Ecol 13:163–168. doi:10.1093/beheco/13.2.163

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Stokke BG (2006) Importance of spatial habitat structure on establishment of host defenses against brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 17:700–708. doi:10.1093/beheco/ark019

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1971) Observation and experiment in analysis of interactions between brood parasites and their hosts. Am Nat 105:71–74. doi:10.1086/282702

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1975) Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim Behav 23:268–278. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90075-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1982) Success and failures in avian egg and nestling recognition with comments on the utility of optimality reasoning. Am Zool 22:547–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutila J, Latja R, Koskela K (2002) The common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and its cavity nesting host, the redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus: a peculiar cuckoo-host system? J Avian Biol 33:414–419. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.02937.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinz HR (1819) Beschreibung und Abbildung der künstlichen Nester und Eier der Vögel. Orell, Füßli, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schrank PF (1798) Fauna Boica. Stein, Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealy S (2008) Cuckoos and their fosterers: uncovering the details of Edward Blyth’s field experiments. Arch Nat Hist (in press)

  • Servedio MR, Lande R (2003) Coevolution of an avian host and its parasitic cuckoo. Evolution 57:1164–1175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoberl F (1836) The natural history of birds. Harris, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjelseth S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Gibbs HL, Taborsky M, Taborsky B et al (2004) Parentage and host preference in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. J Avian Biol 35:21–24. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03219.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1998) On the origin and rarity of interspecific nest parasitism in birds. Am Nat 152:264–272. doi:10.1086/286166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soler JJ, Møller AP (1996) A comparative analysis of the evolution of variation in appearance of eggs of European passerines in relation to brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 7:89–94. doi:10.1093/beheco/7.1.89

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler JJ, Møller AP, Soler M (1999) A comparative study of host selection in the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Oecologia 118:265–276. doi:10.1007/s004420050727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson MD (1998) Patterns of parasitic egg laying and typical nesting in redhead and canvasback ducks. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts; studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 357–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson MD, Payne RB (2002) Molecular genetic perspectives on avian brood parasitism. Integr Comp Biol 42:388–400. doi:10.1093/icb/42.2.388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southern HN (1954) Mimicry in cuckoos’ eggs. In: Huxley JS, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley E (1835) A familiar history of birds: their nature, habits and instincts. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Starling MR, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A, Langmore NE (2006) Cryptic gentes revealed in pallid cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1929–1934. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Honza M (1999) Rejection of artificial cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1483–1488. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0804

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2002) Obligate brood parasites as selective agents for evolution of egg appearance in passerine birds. Evolution 56:199–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Rudolfsen G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2004) Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology 110:459–470. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00978.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2005) The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:17–29. doi:10.2326/osj.4.17

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Hafstad I, Rudolfsen R, Bargain B, Beier J, Bigas Campàs D et al (2007a) Host density predicts presence of cuckoo parasitism in reed warblers. Oikos 116:913–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2007b) The importance of clutch characteristics and learning for antiparasite adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Evolution 61:2212–2228. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00176.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Hafstad I, Rudolfsen R, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Røskaft E et al (2008) Predictors of resistance to brood parasitism within and among reed warbler populations. Behav Ecol (in press)

  • Stresemann E (1951) Die Entwicklung der Ornithologie. Peters, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann E (1975) Ornithology from Aristotle to the present. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Swynnerton CMF (1918) Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 60:127–154. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1918.tb00774.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F, Kawasaki K, Nakamura H, Cohen JE, Shigesada N (1993) Modelling the population dynamics of a cuckoo-host association and the evolution of host defences. Am Nat 142:819–839. doi:10.1086/285574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teuschl Y, Taborsky B, Taborsky M (1998) How do cuckoos find their hosts? The role of habitat imprinting. Anim Behav 56:1425–1433. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0931

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Victoria JK (1972) Clutch characteristics and egg discriminative ability of the African village weaverbird Ploceus cucullatus. Ibis 114:367–376. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1972.tb00834.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl W, Taborsky M, Taborsky B, Teuschl Y, Honza M (2002) Cuckoo females preferentially use specific habitats when searching for host nests. Anim Behav 64:843–850. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl W, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Honza M (2004) Habitat and space use of European cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour 141:881–898. doi:10.1163/1568539042265671

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter A (1876) Beobachtungen aus dem Leben und Treiben des Kuckuks. J Ornithol 24:368–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter A (1889) Zur Frage: Brütet der Kukuk? J Ornithol 37:33–46. doi:10.1007/BF02250546

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter A (1893) Zur Frage: warum brütet der Kukuk nicht? J Ornithol 41:135–149. doi:10.1007/BF02285342

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J (1871) British ornithology or birds of passage. Masters, Maidstone

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton C (1870) Essays on natural history. Warne, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller MW (1959) Parasitic egg laying in the redhead (Aythya americana) and other North American Aanatidae. Ecol Monogr 29:333–365. doi:10.2307/1942134

    Google Scholar 

  • White G (1789) The natural history of Selborne. Kimber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood CA, Fyfe FM (1943) The art of falconry being the De arte venandi cum avibus of Frederick II. of Hohenstaufen. Stanford, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi A (1995) Theory of evolution of nest parasitism in birds. Am Nat 145:434–456. doi:10.1086/285748

    Google Scholar 

  • Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2006) On the origin of brood parasitism in altricial birds. Behav Ecol 17:196–205. doi:10.1093/beheco/arj013

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorn JH (1743) Petinotheologie. Enderes, Schwabach

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Nick Davies, Hans Engländer, Joseph Feldner, Karsten Gärtner, Anna Gisela Johnen, Rolf Schlenker and Spencer Sealy for helping with obscure literature and for fruitful discussions. We are particularly grateful to Juergen Haffer for his constructive comments on a previous draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Schulze-Hagen.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulze-Hagen, K., Stokke, B.G. & Birkhead, T.R. Reproductive biology of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge. J Ornithol 150, 1–16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0340-8

Keywords

Navigation