Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological constraints on the evolution of avian brains

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Birds have brains that are comparable in size to those of mammals. However, variation in relative avian brain size is greater in birds. Thus, birds are ideal subjects for comparative studies on the ecological and behavioral influences on the evolution of the brain and its components. Previous studies of ecological or behavioral correlates in relative brain size were mainly based on gross comparisons between higher taxa or focussed on the relationships between the sizes of specific brain structures and the complexity of different tasks. Here we examine variation in dimensions of the braincase, relative overall brain size and size of its components, in reference to one general ecological and behavioral task: migration. We used data from three lineages of closely related species (14 Acrocephalines, 17 Sylvia and 49 parulid warblers). Within each group, species vary in their migratory tendencies. We found that species migrating long distances have lower skulls and smaller forebrains than resident species. We discuss four hypotheses that could explain smaller forebrain sizes, and suggest relevant taxa to use in comparative analyses to examine each of these hypotheses:

  • Brain size is energetically constrained. Contrasts can be made not only between migrants and residents, but also between birds in habitats with high and low levels of available food.

  • Brain size is developmentally constrained; birds with short growing periods should have smaller forebrains. Comparisons need to be made between birds living in habitats with long and short breeding seasons.

  • Bill adaptations for foraging constrain braincase dimensions. Further analyses would need to be done on groups with high variation in bill dimensions and foraging modes.

  • Birds with small brains have to migrate to compensate for low behavioral flexibility. Contrasts between members of families containing tropical residents and migrants need to be made.

We also raise the question of whether only those parts of the brain are reduced that are most dispensable and whether brain size reduction limits foraging skills and social competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott ML, Walsh CJ, Storey AE, Stenhouse LJ, Harley CW (1999) Hippocampal volume is related to complexity of nesting habitat in Leach’s storm petrel, a nocturnal procellariiform seabird. Brain Behav Evol 53:271–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alerstam T, Hedenström A (1998) The development of bird migration theory. J Avian Biol 29:343–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong E, Bergeron R (1985) Relative brain size and metabolism in birds. Brain Behav Evol 26:141–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austen MJW (1988) Ecomorphology of North American wood warblers. MSc Thesis University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario

  • Barker FK, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG (2001) A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher WJ (1978) Feeding adaptations and evolution in the starlings. Bull Chicago Acad Sci 11:269–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett PM, Harvey PH (1985) Relative brain size and ecology in birds. J Zool 207:151–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold P (1999) A comprehensive theory for the evolution, control and adaptability of avian migration. Ostrich 70:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Boire D, Baron G (1994) Allometric comparison of brain and main brain subdivisions in birds. J Brain Res 35:49–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke MD, Hanley S, Laughlin SB (1999) The scaling of eye size with body mass in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burish MJ, Kueh HY, Wang SSH (2004) Brain architecture and social complexity in modern and ancient birds. Brain Behav Evol 63:107–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cibois A (2003) Sylvia is a babbler: taxonomic implications for the families Sylviidae and Timaliidae. Bull Br Ornithol Club 123:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ (1988) Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 83:596–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H (1996) Migration. The biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Dunning JB (1992) CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.

  • Finlay BL, Darlington RB (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268:1578–1584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay BL, Darlington RB, Nicastro N (2001) Developmental structure in brain evolution. Behav Brain Sci 24:263–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP, Erritzøe J (2002) Coevolving avian eye size and brain size in relation to prey capture and nocturnality. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:961–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garland T, Midford PE, Ives AR (1999) An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral states. Am Zool 39:374–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber RR, Graber JW (1962) Weight characteristics of birds killed in nocturnal migration. Wilson Bull 74:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber RR, Graber JW (1965) Variation in avian brain weights with special reference to age. Condor 67:300–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy S, Guilford T (1990) Olfactory-bulb size and nocturnality in birds. Evolution 44:339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig AJ (2003) Evolution of bird migration: A phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3-20

  • Hurvich CM, Simonoff JS, Tsai CL (1998) Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion. J R Stat Soc Ser B 60:271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF (2003) The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain Behav Evol 62:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalisińska E (2003) Relative size of four parts of brain in Anseriformes and some ecological variables. Vogelwarte 42:142

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Nicolakakis N, Boire D (2002) Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139:939–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B, Winkler H (1985) Ecomorphology. Curr Ornithol 2:155–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B, Winkler H (2003) Morphological consequences of migration in passerines. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175–186

  • Leisler B, Heidrich P, Schulze-Hagen K, Wink M (1997) Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genus Acrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology. J Ornithol 138:469–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovette IJ, Bermingham E (2002) What is a wood-warbler? Molecular characterization of a monophyletic Parulidae. Auk 119:695–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Macphail EM (2002) The role of the avian hippocampus in spatial memory. Psicologica 23:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden J (2001) Sex, bowers and brains. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:833–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mlíkovský J (1989a) Brain size in birds: 1. Tinamiformes through Ciconiiformes. Věst čs Společ zool 53:33–47

  • Mlíkovský J (1989b) Brain size in birds: 2. Falconiformes through Gaviiformes. Vestn Cesk Spol Zool 53:200–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlíkovský J (1989c) Brain size in birds: 3. Columbiformes through Piciformes. Vestn Cesk Spol Zool 53:252–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlíkovský J (1990) Brain size in birds: 4. Passeriformes. Acta Soc Zool Bohemoslov 54:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealen PM, Ricklefs RE (2001) Early diversification of the avian brain:body relationship. J Zool 253:391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolakakis N, Lefebvre L (2000) Forebrain size and innovation rate in European birds: feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour 137:1415–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolakakis N, Sol D, Lefebvre L (2003) Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim Behav 65:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J (1998) Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in song birds. Am Zool 38:179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki S, Searcy W, Peters S (2002) Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J Comp Physiol A 188:1003–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff SJ (1986) A phenetic study of the wood warblers (Parulinae). PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario

  • Portmann A (1962) Cerebralisation und Ontogenese. Med Grundlagenforsch 4:1-62

    Google Scholar 

  • Portmann A, Sutter E (1940) Über die postembryonale Entwicklung des Gehirns bei Vögeln. Rev Suisse Zool 47:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulido F, Rappole JH (2004) Summary: the evolution of avian migration. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 23 (in press)

  • Rappole JH, Jones P (2002) Evolution of old and new world migration systems. In: Both C, Piersma T (eds) The avian calendar: exploring biological hurdles in the annual cycle. Proc 3rd Conf European Ornithol Union. Ardea 90:525–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappole JH, Helm B, Ramos A (2003) An integrative framework for understanding the origin and evolution of avian migration. J Avian Biol 34:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehkämper G, Frahm HD, Zilles K (1991) Quantitative development of brain and brain structures in birds (Galliformes and Passeriformes) compared to that in mammals (Insectivores and Primates). Brain Behav Evol 37:125–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehkämper G, Frahm HD, Mann MD, Vogt C, Vogt O (2000) Evolutionary constraints of large telencephala. In: Roth G, Wullimann MF (eds) Brain evolution and cognition. Wiley, New York, pp 265–290

  • Reiner A, Bruce L, Butler A, Csillag A, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Perkel D, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild M, Ball G, Durand S, Güntürkün O, Lee D, Mello CV, Powers A, White S, Hough G, Kubikova L, Smulders TV, Wada K, Dugas-Ford J, Husband S, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Siang C, Jarvis ED (2004) Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473:377–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Starck JM (1998) The evolution of the developmental mode in birds. In: Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (eds) Avian growth and development. Evolution within the altricial precocial spectrum. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 366–380

  • Schew WA, Ricklefs RE (1998) Developmental plasticity. In: Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (eds) Avian growth and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 288–304

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annu Stat 6:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DF, Duff SJ (1996) Behavioural and neural bases of orientation in food-storing birds. J Exp Biol 199:165–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

  • Smulders TV, Casto JM, Nolan V, Ketterson ED, DeVoogd TJ (2000) Effects of captivity and testosterone on the volumes of four brain regions in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). J Neurobiol 43:244–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York

  • Stokes TM, Leonard CM, Nottebohm F (1974) The telecencephalon, diencephalon and mesencephalon of the canary, Serinus canaria, in stereotaxic coordinates. J Comp Neurol 156, 337–374

  • Timmermans S, Lefebvre L, Boire D, Basu P (2000) Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of innovation rate in birds. Brain Behav Evol 56:196–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wikelski M, Tarlow EM, Raim A, Diehl RH, Larkin RP, Visser H (2003) Avian metabolism: Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature 423:703–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winker K (2000) Migration and speciation. Nature 404:36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler H, Leisler B (2004) To be a migrant: ecomorphological burdens and chances. In: Greenberg R, Marra P (eds) Birds of two worlds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Blondel and the curators of the museums in Tring, Tervuren, Vienna, Bonn, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart, Washington, New York, Pretoria, Cape Town, and Paris for access to and loan of specimens. Special thanks are due to K.-H. Siebenrock who measured the skulls of Acrocephalines and Sylvia warblers. We thank Samuel S-H Wang, Princeton University, and his group for giving us access to their manuscript before publication. We are also grateful to W. Hochachka, F. Pulido, and M. Winter for helpful discussion and useful criticism of an earlier version of this manuscript. Birds were collected with permission of the governments of the city of Vienna (MA22–3472/2002), and the state of Burgenland (5-N-A1007/152–2002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Konrad Lorenz Institute for Comparative Ethology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Savoyenstrasse 1A, 1160, Vienna, Austria

    Hans Winkler

  2. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany

    Bernd Leisler

  3. FB Organismische Biologie, Universität Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria

    Gustav Bernroider

Authors
  1. Hans Winkler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernd Leisler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gustav Bernroider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Winkler.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, H., Leisler, B. & Bernroider, G. Ecological constraints on the evolution of avian brains. J Ornithol 145, 238–244 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-004-0040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-004-0040-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation