Skip to main content
Log in

Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Helping others at no cost to oneself is a simple way to demonstrate other-regarding preferences. Yet, primates exhibit mixed results for other-regarding preferences: chimpanzees and tamarins do not show these effects, whereas capuchin monkeys and marmosets preferentially give food to others. One factor of relevance to this no-cost food donation is the payoff to the donor. Though donors always receive the same payoffs regardless of their choice, previous work varies in whether they receive either a food reward or no food reward. Here, I tested cotton-top tamarins in a preferential giving task. Subjects could choose from two tools, one of which delivered food to a partner in an adjacent cage and the other of which delivered food to an empty cage. Thus, subjects could preferentially give or withhold food from a partner. I varied whether subjects received food payoffs, whether a partner was present or absent, and whether the partner was a non-cagemate or the subject’s mate. Results showed that the subjects’ overall motivation to pull either tool declined when they did not receive any food. Additionally, they did not preferentially donate or withhold food, regardless of their own payoff or their relationship with the partner. Thus, cotton-top tamarins do not take advantage of cost-free food giving, either when they might gain in the future (mates) or when they have no opportunity for future interactions (non-cagemates).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Are apes really inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3123–3128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, van Schaik C (2009) Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Anim Cogn 13:1–19. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:19762–19766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MK, Hauser M (2005) Modeling reciprocation and cooperation in primates: evidence for a punishing strategy. J Theor Biol 235:5–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin KA, Schroeder KKE, Rothwell ES, Silk JB, Snowdon CT (2009) Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. J Comp Psychol 123:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (2003) The chimpanzee’s service economy: evidence for cognition-based reciprocal exchange. In: Ostrom E, Walker J (eds) Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 128–143

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM, Leimgruber K, Greenberg AR (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:13685–13689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubreuil D, Gentile SM, Visalberghi E (2006) Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1223–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot MB, Watson SL, Roberts KA, Miller RW (2007) Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 74:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Chen MK, Chen F, Chuang E (2003) Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2363–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy SB (2005) Evolutionary context of human development: the cooperative breeding model. In: Carter CS, Ahnert L, Grossmann KE, Hrdy SB (eds) Attachment and bonding: a new synthesis. (vol. 92). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan VR, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006a) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006b) Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation. Anim Behav 72:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller MN, Mitani JC (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Stud Behav 35:275–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiworth JJ, Johnson ET, Whillock K, Greenberg J, Brown V (2009) Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 123:10–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson J, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition 12:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth S, Susan A, Mascaro J, Shapiro S (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437:1357–1359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JR, Stephens DW (2004) The economic basis of cooperation: trade-offs between selfishness and generosity. Behav Ecol 15:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2009) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0248-6

  • van Wolkenten M, Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2007) Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:18854–18859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Henrich J, Shapiro S, Richardson A, Lambeth S, Povinelli DJ (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Anim Behav 75:1757–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken F, Tomasello M (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:1301–1303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5:e184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2009) How did altruism and reciprocity evolve in humans? Interact Stud 10:150–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for funding from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (National Institutes of Health). I am particularly thankful to Marc Hauser for help in designing the experiment, for providing the facilities to run the experiment, and for comments on an early version of the manuscript. I appreciate feedback from three anonymous referees. I wish to thank Walt Gardner, Justus Meyer, Nina Strohminger, Heather Trevino, and Abby Wild for assistance in testing the tamarins, and I thank the members the Cognitive Evolution Laboratory at Harvard for valuable discussions about the project. This experiment was conducted in compliance with the Harvard University Animal Care protocols 92-16 and 22-07 and the APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Stevens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, J.R. Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 13, 663–670 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x

Keywords

Navigation