Abstract
Helping others at no cost to oneself is a simple way to demonstrate other-regarding preferences. Yet, primates exhibit mixed results for other-regarding preferences: chimpanzees and tamarins do not show these effects, whereas capuchin monkeys and marmosets preferentially give food to others. One factor of relevance to this no-cost food donation is the payoff to the donor. Though donors always receive the same payoffs regardless of their choice, previous work varies in whether they receive either a food reward or no food reward. Here, I tested cotton-top tamarins in a preferential giving task. Subjects could choose from two tools, one of which delivered food to a partner in an adjacent cage and the other of which delivered food to an empty cage. Thus, subjects could preferentially give or withhold food from a partner. I varied whether subjects received food payoffs, whether a partner was present or absent, and whether the partner was a non-cagemate or the subject’s mate. Results showed that the subjects’ overall motivation to pull either tool declined when they did not receive any food. Additionally, they did not preferentially donate or withhold food, regardless of their own payoff or their relationship with the partner. Thus, cotton-top tamarins do not take advantage of cost-free food giving, either when they might gain in the future (mates) or when they have no opportunity for future interactions (non-cagemates).
References
Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Are apes really inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3123–3128
Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299
Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:253–258
Burkart JM, van Schaik C (2009) Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Anim Cogn 13:1–19. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7
Burkart JM, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:19762–19766
Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Chen MK, Hauser M (2005) Modeling reciprocation and cooperation in primates: evidence for a punishing strategy. J Theor Biol 235:5–12
Cronin KA, Schroeder KKE, Rothwell ES, Silk JB, Snowdon CT (2009) Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. J Comp Psychol 123:231–241
de Waal FBM (2003) The chimpanzee’s service economy: evidence for cognition-based reciprocal exchange. In: Ostrom E, Walker J (eds) Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 128–143
de Waal FBM, Leimgruber K, Greenberg AR (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:13685–13689
Dubreuil D, Gentile SM, Visalberghi E (2006) Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1223–1228
Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, New York
Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868
Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–1083
Fontenot MB, Watson SL, Roberts KA, Miller RW (2007) Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 74:487–496
Hauser MD, Chen MK, Chen F, Chuang E (2003) Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2363–2370
Hrdy SB (2005) Evolutionary context of human development: the cooperative breeding model. In: Carter CS, Ahnert L, Grossmann KE, Hrdy SB (eds) Attachment and bonding: a new synthesis. (vol. 92). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 9–32
Jensen K, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1013–1021
Lakshminarayanan VR, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000
Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006a) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300
Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006b) Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation. Anim Behav 72:275–286
Muller MN, Mitani JC (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Stud Behav 35:275–331
Neiworth JJ, Johnson ET, Whillock K, Greenberg J, Brown V (2009) Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 123:10–17
Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120:67–73
Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson J, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition 12:505–509
Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth S, Susan A, Mascaro J, Shapiro S (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437:1357–1359
Stevens JR, Stephens DW (2004) The economic basis of cooperation: trade-offs between selfishness and generosity. Behav Ecol 15:255–261
Takimoto A, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2009) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0248-6
van Wolkenten M, Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2007) Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:18854–18859
von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Henrich J, Shapiro S, Richardson A, Lambeth S, Povinelli DJ (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Anim Behav 75:1757–1770
Warneken F, Tomasello M (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:1301–1303
Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5:e184
Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2009) How did altruism and reciprocity evolve in humans? Interact Stud 10:150–182
Acknowledgments
I am grateful for funding from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (National Institutes of Health). I am particularly thankful to Marc Hauser for help in designing the experiment, for providing the facilities to run the experiment, and for comments on an early version of the manuscript. I appreciate feedback from three anonymous referees. I wish to thank Walt Gardner, Justus Meyer, Nina Strohminger, Heather Trevino, and Abby Wild for assistance in testing the tamarins, and I thank the members the Cognitive Evolution Laboratory at Harvard for valuable discussions about the project. This experiment was conducted in compliance with the Harvard University Animal Care protocols 92-16 and 22-07 and the APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevens, J.R. Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 13, 663–670 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x