Skip to main content
Log in

Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many wild primates occupy large home ranges and travel long distances each day. Navigating these ranges to find sufficient food presents a substantial cognitive challenge, but we are still far from understanding either how primates represent spatial information mentally or how they use this information to navigate under natural conditions. In the course of a long-term socioecological study, we investigated and compared the travel paths of sympatric spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) and woolly monkeys (Lagothrix poeppigii) in Amazonian Ecuador. During several field seasons spanning an 8-year period, we followed focal individuals or groups of both species continuously for periods of multiple days and mapped their travel paths in detail. We found that both primates typically traveled through their home ranges following repeatedly used paths, or “routes”. Many of these routes were common to both species and were stable across study years. Several important routes appeared to be associated with distinct topographic features (e.g., ridgetops), which may constitute easily recognized landmarks useful for spatial navigation. The majority of all location records for both species fell along or near identified routes, as did most of the trees used for fruit feeding. Our results provide strong support for the idea that both woolly and spider monkey use route-based mental maps similar to those proposed by Poucet (Psychol Rev 100:163–182, 1993). We suggest that rather than remembering the specific locations of thousands of individual feeding trees and their phenological schedules, spider and woolly monkeys could nonetheless forage efficiently by committing to memory a series of route segments that, when followed, bring them into contact with many potential feeding sources for monitoring or visitation. Furthermore, because swallowed and defecated seeds are deposited in greater frequency along routes, the repeated use of particular travel paths over generations could profoundly influence the structure and composition of tropical forests, raising the intriguing possibility that these and other primate frugivores are active participants in constructing their own ecological niches. Building upon the insights of Byrne (Q J Exp Psychol 31:147–154, 1979, Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. Academic, London, pp 239–264, 1982) and Milton (The foraging strategy of howler monkeys: a study in primate economics. Columbia University Press, New York, 1980, On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 375–417, 2000), our results highlight the likely general importance of route-based travel in the memory and foraging strategies of nonhuman primates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton RA (2000) Primate brain evolution: cognitive demands of foraging or social life. In: Boinski SB, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 204–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S (1996) No evidence for cognitive mapping in rats. Anim Behav 52:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD (1996) Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol 199:219–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) (2000) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Byrne RW (1979) Memory for urban geography. Q J Exp Psychol 31:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RW (1982). Geographical knowledge and orientation. In: Ellis A (ed) Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. Academic, London, pp 239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne R (2000) How monkeys find their way: leadership, coordination, and cognitive maps of African baboons. In: Boinski SB, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 491–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant JGH, Youlatos D, Rose MD (2001) Locomotor behavior of Lagothrix lagothricha and Ateles belzebuth in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador: general patterns and nonsuspensory modes. J Hum Evolut 41:141–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Chapman LJ (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham E, Janson C (2007) A socioecological perspective on primate cognition, past and present. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0078-3

  • Defler TR (1996) Aspects of the ranging pattern in a group of wild woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha). Am J Primatol 38:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew JL (2001) Synecology and seed dispersal in woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha peoppigii) and spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) in Parque Nacional Yasuní, Ecuador. PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California

  • Di Fiore A (1997) Ecology and behavior of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii, Atelinae) in Eastern Ecuador. PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California

  • Di Fiore A (2003) Ranging behavior and foraging ecology of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Am J Primatol 59:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Fiore A (2004) Diet and feeding ecology of woolly monkeys in a western Amazonian rainforest. Int J Primatol 24:767–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Fiore A, Campbell CJ (2007) The atelines: Variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M, Bearder S (eds) Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 155–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Maurer R, Séguinot V (1996) Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. J Exp Biol 199:201–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1989) Animal cognition: the representation of space, time and number. Ann Rev Psychol 40:155–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Cramer AE (1996) Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. J Exp Biol 199:211–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garber PA (1989) Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis. Am J Primatol 19:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber PA (2000) Evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information by some primate foragers. In: Boinski SB, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 261–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1987) Landmark learning by honey bees. Anim Behav 35:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould-Beierle K, Kamil A (1996) The use of local and global cues by Clark’s nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana. Anim Behav 52:519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock C, Sherry D. (1990) Long-term memory for cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Anim Behav 40:701–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs L, Liman E (1991) Grey squirrels remember the locations of buried nuts. Anim Behav 41:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson CH (1998) Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 55:1229–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janson C (2000) Spatial movement strategies: theory, evidence, and challenges. In: Boinski SB, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 165–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson C (2007) Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0079-2

  • Janson CH, Di Bitetti MS (1997) Experimental analysis of food detection in cauchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL, Klein DJ (1977) Feeding behavior of the Colombian spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology: studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys, and apes. Academic, London, pp 153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1999) Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10242–10247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JR (1974) The behavior and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). Anim Behav 22:3–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel CR (1991) Cognitive aspects of foraging in Japanese monkeys. Anim Behav 41:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (1980) The foraging strategy of howler monkeys: a study in primate economics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (1981) Diversity of plant foods in tropical forests as a stimulus to mental development in primates. Am Anthropol 83:534–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (2000) Quo vadis? Tactics of food search and group movement in primates and other animals. In: Boinski SB, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 375–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ (1988) Niche constructing phenotypes. In: Plotkin HC (ed) The role of behavior in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 73–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (1996) Niche construction. Am Nat 147:641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland NK, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres CA (1994) Diet and feeding ecology of gray woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) in Central Amazonia: comparisons with other atelines. Int J Primatol 15:333–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Poucet B (1993) Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol Rev 100:163–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russo SE (2003) Linking spatial patterns of seed dispersal and plant recruitment in a neotropical tree, Virola calophylla (Myristicaceae). PhD Dissertation, Department of Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

  • Sigg H, Stolba A (1981) Home range and daily march in a hamadryas baboon troop. Folia Primatol 36:40–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson PR (2000) Seed dispersal by woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia: dispersal distance, germination rates, and dispersal quantity. Am J Primatol 50:275–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson PR, Castellanos MC, Pizarro JC, Garavito M (2002) Effects of seed dispersal by three ateline monkey species on seed germination at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Int J Primatol 23:1187–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson PR, Quiñones MJ, Ahumada JA (1994) Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Am J Primatol 32:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez SA (2003) Spatio-temporal foraging skills of white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) in the Yasuni National Park, Ecuador. PhD Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook

  • Suarez SA (2006) Diet and travel costs for spider monkeys in a nonseasonal, hyperdiverse environment. Int J Primatol 27:411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symington MM (1990) Fission-fusion social organization in Ateles and Pan. Int J Primatol 11:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Roosmalen MGM (1985) Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758) in Surinam. Acta Amazonica 15:1–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlasak AN (2006a) Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Anim Cogn 9:71–80, doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0006-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlasak AN (2006b) The relative importance of global and local landmarks in navigation by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). J Comp Psychol 120:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yumoto T, Kimura K, Nishimura A (1999) Estimation of the retention times and distances of seed dispersed by two monkey species, Alouatta seniculus and Lagothrix lagotricha, in a Colombian forest. Ecol Res 14:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW (1977) Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology: studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys, and apes. Academic, London, pp 504–538

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the Ministerio del Ambiente of the government of Ecuador for their continued interest in long-term research on the primate community of Yasuní National Park. Logistical support for this study was provided by the Estación Científica Yasuní of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. We are also grateful to Maxus Ecuador, Inc. and Repsol-YPF for additional assistance. Numerous field assistants and companions helped with the collection of primate ranging data and with trail mapping, including Wampi Ahua, Larry Dew, Nathaniel Gerhardt, Carrie Linder, Christine Lucas, Juan Nenquimo, Boyo Orengo, Kristin Phillips, Wilmer Pozo, Stephanie Spehar, Matt Swarner, Julia Willner, Denis Youlatos, and, especially, Andres Link who collected much of the 2002–2003 data. Financial support was provided by the NSF, the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, Primate Conservation, Inc., the University of California at Davis, New York University, Stony Brook University, and the New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology. Finally, we thank Elena Cunningham and Charlie Janson for inviting us to participate in the “Socioecological Cognition” symposium held at the XXth Congress of the International Primatological Society in Torino, Italy, and we are grateful to Sue Boinski and three anonymous reviewers whose comments contributed to the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Di Fiore.

Additional information

This contribution is part of the Special Issue “A Socioecological Perspective on Primate Cognition” (Cunningham and Janson 2007).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Fiore, A., Suarez, S.A. Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications. Anim Cogn 10, 317–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0067-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0067-y

Keywords

Navigation