Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Screening for psychopathology in child welfare: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) compared with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA)

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 20 October 2009

Abstract

Whilst children in child welfare suffer more psychopathology than their community peers, only a small percentage of them actually receive mental health care. Previous literature suggested that all children entering child welfare should be screened. This study evaluated whether the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) could be used for this purpose. The extended version of the SDQ and the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) questionnaire were administered to parents and caregivers of 292 children in child welfare. Children older than 11 years also completed the SDQ self-report and the Youth Self Report (YSR). Furthermore, the child’s history of service use was recorded and informants were asked if the actual care was sufficient. Inter-informant correlations for the scores from the SDQ and ASEBA were high and comparable or favoured the use of the SDQ (for parents and caregivers). Internal consistency was satisfactory to good. For all informants, high correlations were found between SDQ and ASEBA. Despite high scores on the SDQ, only 29% of the children had received mental health care. Service use was only correlated with the parent SDQ and the CBCL and TRF. Additional help, as requested by 21% of the parents and 37% of the caregivers, correlated moderately with the SDQ and ASEBA scores. Compared to the total difficulties score, the impact supplement is a better predictor of service use and the informant’s request for additional help. This study illustrates that the Dutch version of the SDQ, similar to the English and German versions, has equal validity as the Dutch ASEBA for screening children. Caution is warranted when the SDQ is the only source of information for referrals to specialized care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach TM (1991a) Manual for the child behavior cekclist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington

  2. Achenbach TM (1991b) Manual for the teacher’s report form and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington

  3. Achenbach TM (1991c) Manual for the youth self-report form and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington

  4. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Child Welfare League of America (2002) AAACAP/CWLA Policy statement on mental health and substance use screening and assessment of children in foster care. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Child Welfare League of America

  5. Arcelus J, Bellerby T, Vostanis P (1999) A mental health service for young people in the care of the local authority. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 4:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Armsden G, Pecora PJ, Payne V, Szatkiewicz JP (2000) Children placed in long-term foster care: an intake profile using the child behavior checklist/4–18. J Emot Behav Disord 8:49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker A, Hagenberg N, Roessner V, Woerner W, Rothenberger A (2004) Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:ii17–ii24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker A, Woerner W, Hasselhorn M, Banaschewski T, Rothenberger A (2004) Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:ii11–ii16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blower A, Addo A, Hodgson J, Lamington L, Towlson K (2004) Mental health of ‘looked after’ children: a needs assessment. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 9:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burns B, Phillips S, Wagner R, Barth R, Kolko D, Campbell Y, Landsverk J (2004) Mental health need and access to mental health services by youths involved with child welfare: a national survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43:960–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crone M, Vogels A, Hoekstra F, Treffers P, Reijneveld S (2008) A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated strengths and difficulties questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system. BMC Public Health 8:106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Groot A, Koot HM, Verhulst FC (1994) Cross-cultural generalizability of the child behavior checklist cross-informant syndromes. Psychol Assess 6:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dimigen G, Del Priore C, Butler S, Evans S, Ferguson L, Swan M (1999) Psychiatric disorder among children at time of entering local authority care: questionnaire survey. Br Med J 319:675

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubowitz H, Fiegelman S, Harrington D, Starr RJr, Zuravin S, Sayer R (1994) Behavior problems of children in kinship care. Dev Behav Pediatr 14:386–395

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garland A, Hough RL, McCabe K, Yeh M, Wood PA, Aarons GA (2001) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in youths across five sectors of care. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:409–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goedhart A, Treffers F, Van Widenfelt BM (2003) Vragen naar psychische problemen bij kinderen en adolescenten. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 3:1018–1035

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:791–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (1998) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 7:125–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman R, Scott S (1999) Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Service HealthAdvisory (1995) Together we stand: the commissioning role and management of child and adolescent mental health services. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heflinger CA, Simpkins CG, Combs-Orme T (2000) Using the CBCL to determine the clinical status of children in state custody. Child Youth Serv Rev 22:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hellinckx W, Grietens H (1994) Prevalence of problem behavior in foster children in Flanders. Community Altern Int J Fam Care 62:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hukkanen R, Sourander A, Bergroth L, Piha J (1999) Psychosocial factors and adequacy of services for children in children’s homes. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8:268–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Indredavik MS, Vik T, Heyerdahl S, Kusleng S, Brubakk AM (2005) Psychiatric symptoms in low birth weight adolescents, assessed by screening questionnaires. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 14:226–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kjelsberg E, Nygren P (2004) The prevalence of emotional and behavioural problems in institutionalized childcare clients. Nord J Psychiatry 58:319–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Klasen H, Woerner W, Wolke D, Meyer R, Overmeyer S, Kaschnitz W, Rothenberger A, Goodman R (2000) Comparing the German versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ–Deu) and the child behavior checklist. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9:271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koskelainen M, Sourander A, Kaljonen A (2000) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire among finnish school-aged children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leslie L, Landsverk J, Ezzet-Lofstrom R, Tschann J, Slymen D, Garland A (2000) Children in foster care: factors influencing outpatient mental health service. Child Abuse Negl 24:465–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marzocchi GM, Capron C, Di Pietro M, Tauleria ED, Duyme M, Frigerio A, Gaspar MF, Hamilton H, Pithon G, Simões A, Thérond C (2004) The use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:ii40–ii46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McCann J, James A, Wilson S, Dunn G (1996) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in young people in the care system. Br Med J 313:225–233

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T (2000) Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mount J, Lister A, Bennun I (2004) Identifying the mental health needs of looked after young people. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 9:363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F (2003) The strenghts and difficulties questionnaire. Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Obel C, Heiervang E, Rodriguez A, Heyerdahl S, Smedje H, Sourander A, Guethmundsson ÓÓ, Clench-Aas J, Christensen E, Heian F, Mathiesen KS, Magnússon P, Njarethvík Uu, Koskelainen M, Rønning JA, Stormark KM, Olsen J (2004) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:ii32–ii39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Phillips J (1997) Meeting the psychiatric needs of children in foster care: social workers’ views. Psychiatr Bull 21:609–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Scholte EM (1997) Exploration of criteria for residential and foster care. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:657–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Scott S (2004) Reviewing the research on the mental health of looked after children: Some issues for the development of more evidence informed practice. Int J Child Fam Welf 7:86–97

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smedje H, Broman J-E, Hetta J, von Knorring A-L (1999) Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8:63–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Treffers PDA, van Widenfelt BM (2000) Dutch translation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Internal document Leiden University Medical Center Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Curium Oegstgeest

    Google Scholar 

  42. Van Leeuwen K, Meerschaert T, Bosmans G, De Medts L, Braet C (2006) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. Eur J Psychol Assess 22:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. van Widenfelt BM, Goedhart AW, Treffers PDA, Goodman R (2003) Dutch version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Verhulst FC, van der Ende J, Koot HM (1996) Handleiding voor de CBCL/4–18. Afdeling Kinder- en Jeugdpsychiatrie Sophia, Kinderziekenhuis/Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam/Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam

  45. Verhulst FC, Van der Ende J, Koot HM (1997a) Handleiding voor de Teacher’s Report Form (TRF). Afdeling Kinder- en Jeugdpsychiatrie Sophia Kinderziekenhuis/Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam/Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam

  46. Verhulst FC, van der Ende J, Koot HM (1997b) Handleiding voor de Youth Self-Report (YSR). Afdeling Kinder- en Jeugdpsychiatrie Sophia Kinderziekenhuis/Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam/Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Centre Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Antwerp (UCKJA), Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Building R 3:23, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium

    Astrid Janssens & Dirk Deboutte

Authors
  1. Astrid Janssens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Deboutte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Janssens.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-009-0071-2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janssens, A., Deboutte, D. Screening for psychopathology in child welfare: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) compared with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 18, 691–700 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-009-0030-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-009-0030-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation