Skip to main content
Log in

A stingless bee uses labial gland secretions for scent trail communication (Trigona recursa Smith 1863)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pheromones used by several species of stingless bees for scent trail communication are generally assumed to be produced by the mandibular glands. Here we present strong evidence that in Trigona recursa these pheromones originate from the labial glands, which are well developed in the heads of foragers. Analysis of the behavior involved in scent marking shows that a bee extends her proboscis and rubs it over the substrate. A single scent marking event lasts for 0.59±0.21 s while the bee runs a stretch of 1.04±0.37 cm on a leaf. According to choice experiments the bees are attracted by a feeder baited with labial gland extract (84.2±6% of the bees choose this feeder) but repelled from a feeder baited with mandibular gland extract (only 27.5±13.1% of the bees choose this feeder). They do not discriminate between two clean feeders (49.6±3% of the bees at a feeder). 87±5.1% of bees already feeding leave the feeder after the application of mandibular gland extract whereas only 6.2±4.9% and 2.6±4% do so when labial gland extract or pure solvent was applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergman P, Bergström G (1997) Scent marking, scent origin, and species specificity in male premating behavior of two Scandinavian bumblebees. J Chem Ecol 23:1235–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Vries H de (2001) Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum MS, Brand JM (1972) Social insect pheromones: their chemistry and function. Am Zool 12:553–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blum MS, Crewe RM, Kerr WE, Keith LH, Garrison AW, Walker MM (1970) Citral in stingless bees: isolation and functions in trail-laying and robbing. J Insect Physiol 16:1637–1648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz Landim C da (1967) Estudo comparativo de algumas glândulas das abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) e respectivas implicações evolutivas. Arq Zool S Paulo15:177–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch H (1967) Die Bedeutung der Lauterzeugung für die Verständigung der stachellosen Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 56:199–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarau S, Hrncir M, Schmidt VM, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2003) Effectiveness of recruitment behavior in stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini). Insectes Soc 50:365–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK (1987) Communication of food source location by the stingless bee Trigona fulviventris. In: Eder J, Rembold H (eds.) Chemistry and biology of social insects. Peperny, München, pp 698–699

  • Johnson LK, Wiemer DF (1982) Nerol: an alarm substance of the stingless bee, Trigona fulviventris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Chem Ecology 8:1167–1181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK, Haynes LW, Carlson MA, Fortnum HA, Gorgas DL (1985) Alarm substances of the stingless bee, Trigona silvestriana. J Chem Ecology 11:409–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeping MG, Crewe RM, Field BI (1982) Mandibular gland secretions of the old world stingless bee, Trigona gribodoi Magretti: isolation, identification, and compositional changes with age. J Apic Res 21:65–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WE, Costa Cruz C da (1961) Funções diferentes tomadas pela glândula mandibular na evolução das abelhas em geral e em “Trigona (Oxytrigona) tataira” em especial. Rev Brasil Biol 21:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WE, Esch H (1965) Comunicação entre as abelhas sociais brasileiras e sua contribuição para o entendimento da sua evolução. Ciên Cult (Sao Paolo) 17:529–538

  • Kerr WE, Ferreira A, Mattos NS de (1963) Communication among stingless bees—additional data (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J N Y Entomol Soc 71:80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WE, Blum M, Fales HM (1981) Communication of food source between workers of Trigona (Trigona) spinipes. Rev Brasil Biol 41:619–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte M de, Weissenbacher KH, Crewe RM (1988) Chemical signals in a stingless bee Trigona (Meliplebeia) denoiti Vachal (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). J Entomol Soc South Afr 51:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg B, Bergström G, Bringer B, Carlberg B, Cederberg B (1973) Observations on scent marking by Bombus Latr. and Psithyrus Lep. males (Hym., Apidae) and localization of site of production of the secretion. Zoon [Suppl] 1:23–30

  • Lindauer M, Kerr WE (1958) Die gegenseitige Verständigung bei den stachellosen Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 41:405–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer M, Kerr WE (1960) Communication between the workers of stingless bees. Bee World 41:29–41, 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Luby JM, Regnier FE, Clarke ET, Weaver EC, Weaver N (1973) Volatile cephalic substances of the stingless bees, Trigona mexicana and Trigona pectoralis. J Insect Physiol 19:1111–1127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The Social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

  • Nieh JC, Contrera FAL, Nogueira-Neto P (2003) Pulsed mass recruitment by a stingless bee, Trigona hyalinata. Proc R Soc London Ser B 270:2191–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll FB (2002) Behavioral phylogeny of corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with special reference to social behavior. Cladistics 18:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Schmidt VM, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2003) A stingless bee marks the feeding site in addition to the scent path (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis Moure 1942). Apidologie 34:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva de Moraes RLM (2002) Glândulas salivares do adulto. In: Cruz Landim C da, Camargo Abdalla F (eds) Glândulas Exócrinas das Abelhas. FUNPEC—Editora, Ribeirão Preto São Paulo, pp 51–70

  • Simpson J, Riedel IBM (1964) Discharge and manipulation of labial gland secretion by workers of Apis mellifera (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Proc R Entomol Soc London Ser A 39:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BH, Roubik DW (1983) Mandibular glands of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): chemical analysis of their contents and biological function in two species of Melipona. J Chem Ecol 9:1465–1472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver N, Weaver EC, Clarke ET (1975) Reactions of five species of stingless bees to some volatile chemicals and to other species of bees. J Insect Physiol 21:479–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1965) Chemical communication in the social insects. Science 149:1064–1071

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Sidnei Mateus for his valuable help in finding and collecting the bee nests in Pedregulho. This study was supported by grant P-14328 of the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) to F.G.B. This work complies with the current laws of Brazil where the experiments were carried out.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Jarau.

Addendum

Addendum

After the submission of our manuscript a paper by Nieh et al. (2003) appeared which has some relevance in regard of our main finding. According to these authors mandible extracts of T. hyalinata (concentration corresponding to 0.5 bee equivalents) offered at a feeding table released aggressive behavior in newly arriving bees for about 8 min. During this time newcomers did not land to feed. Subsequently, the bees were attracted by the extracts. On the other hand, the authors found a temporal synchronization of recruitment and odor marking. Newcomers arrived at the feeder at the same time foragers scent marked. Despite the mismatch of these findings Nieh et al. (2003) concluded that T. hyalinata recruiters deposit mandibular gland secretions to mark the scent trail.

In order to prepare the “mandibular gland” extract Nieh et al. (2003) pulled out the entire mandibles of the worker bees’ heads together with the mandibular glands and other tissues attached to them (see their Fig. 4). When using this method in T. recursa we frequently pulled out parts of the labial glands together with the mandible. A careful separation of the mandibular gland prior to its extraction is therefore necessary.

Regarding the repellent effect of the mandibular gland extracts the data of Nieh et al. (2003) and our own are in agreement. The attraction of the newcomers after eight minutes in the study by Nieh et al. (2003), however, probably was due to labial gland secretion unknowingly contained in the “mandibular gland” extract.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jarau, S., Hrncir, M., Zucchi, R. et al. A stingless bee uses labial gland secretions for scent trail communication (Trigona recursa Smith 1863). J Comp Physiol A 190, 233–239 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0489-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0489-9

Keywords

Navigation