Skip to main content
Log in

The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 1. Inter-group interactions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groups of individuals frequently interact with each other, but typically analysis of such interactions is restricted to isolated dyads. Social network analysis (SNA) provides a method of analysing polyadic interactions and is used to analyse interactions between individuals. We use a population of 12 groups (ca. 250 animals) of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta) to test whether SNA can also be used to describe and elucidate patterns of inter-group interactions. Using data collected over 24 months, we constructed two sets of networks, based on direct encounters between groups and instances of roving males visiting other groups. We analysed replicated networks of each type of interaction to investigate similarities between networks of different social interactions as well as testing their stability over time. The two network types were similar to each other when derived from long-term data, but showed significant differences in structure over shorter timescales where they varied according to seasonal and ecological conditions. Networks for both types of inter-group interaction constructed from data collected over 3 months reliably described long-term (12- and 24-month) patterns of interactions between groups, indicating a stable social structure despite variation in group sizes and sex ratios over time. The centrality of each meerkat group in roving interactions networks was unaffected by the sex ratio of its members, indicating that male meerkats preferentially visit geographically close groups rather than those containing most females. Indeed, the strongest predictors of network structure were spatial factors, suggesting that, in contrast to analyses of intra-group interactions, analyses of inter-group interactions using SNA must take spatial factors into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams ES, Mesterton-Gibbons M (2003) Lanchester’s attrition models and fights among social animals. Behav Ecol 14:719–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard JA (2000) Costs and benefits of group foraging in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Christley RM, Pinchbeck GL, Bowers RG, Clancy D, French NP, Bennett R, Turner J (2005) Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. Am J Epidemiol 162:1024–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton WD, Harman KT, Williamson H (2006) GrassBase—the Online World Grass Flora. http://www.kew.org/data/grasses-db.html.

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Gaynor D, Kansky R, MacColl ADC, McIlrath G, Chadwick P, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain JM, Manser M, Skinner JD (1998) Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates, Suricata suricatta. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:185–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Maccoll A, Chadwick P, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Skinner JD (1999) Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari. Afr J Ecol 37:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S516–S519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM (2004) Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 41:879–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolan SP, Macdonald DW (1996) Dispersal and extra-territorial prospecting by slender-tailed meerkats (Suricata suricatta) in the south-western Kalahari. J Zool 240:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to social network methods. Published in digital form at: http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/, University of California, Riverside.

  • Jordan NR, Cherry MI, Manser M (2007) Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence. Anim Behav 73:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Croft D, James R (2007) Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D, Newman MEJ (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S477–S481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D, Wilson BEN, Hammond PS, Grellier K, Durban JW, Parsons KM, Barton TR, Thompson PM (2006) Quantifying the influence of sociality on population structure in bottlenose dolphins. J Anim Ecol 75:14–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10910–10914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radford AN, du Plessis MA (2004) Territorial vocal rallying in the green woodhoopoe: factors affecting contest length and outcome. Anim Behav 68:803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Gillespie A, Griffin AS (2007) Meerkats. Curr Biol 17:R442–R443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder TB, McDonald DB, Blake JG, Parker PG, Loiselle BA (2008) Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda). Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1367–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas POR, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Davis A, Faria JJ, Dyer JRG, Piyapong C, Ramnarine I, Ruxton GD, Krause J (2008) Does defection during predator inspection affect social structure in wild shoals of guppies. Anim Behav 75:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordán F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (1997) Analysing animal social structure. Anim Behav 53:1053–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H, Dufault S (1999) Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: review and recommendations. Adv Study Behav 28:33–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ML, Britton NF, Franks NR (2002) Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1107–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav 74:1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AJ, Carlson AA, Clutton-Brock T (2005) Trade-offs between extraterritorial prospecting and helping in a cooperative mammal. Anim Behav 70:829–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AJ, Spong G, Clutton-Brock T (2007) Subordinate male meerkats prospect for extra-group paternity: alternative reproductive tactics in a cooperative mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1603–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tim Clutton-Brock provided scientific advice, allowed us to work on the meerkat population of the Kalahari Meerkat Project and provided access to the long-term data from the project. We thank the owners of farms surrounding the Reserve for permission to study meerkats on their land and Northern Cape Conservation for allowing us to work in the Kalahari. Tom Flower, Rob Sutcliffe and Dave Bell managed the Meerkat Project with aplomb. We are greatly indebted to all the volunteers who assisted with data collection in the field. Martin Haupt of the University of Pretoria supplied invaluable logistical support. This manuscript was greatly improved by comments from two anonymous referees. JAD was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Higher Education Funding Council for England through the Cambridge Infectious Diseases Consortium. JRM was funded by a BBSRC grant to Tim Clutton-Brock.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Madden.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Setchell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drewe, J.A., Madden, J.R. & Pearce, G.P. The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 1. Inter-group interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1295–1306 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0782-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0782-x

Keywords

Navigation