Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive load and modelling of an algebra problem

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, I examine a modelling strategy as employed by a teacher in the context of an algebra lesson. The actions of this teacher suggest that a modelling approach will have a greater impact on enriching student learning if we do not lose sight of the need to manage associated cognitive loads that could either aid or hinder the integration of core concepts with processes that are at play. Results here also show that modelling a problem that is set within an authentic context helps learners develop a better appreciation of variables and relations that constitute the model. The teacher’s scaffolding actions revealed the use of strategies that foster the development of connected, meaningful and more useable algebraic knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum, W. (2002). ICMI Study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education — discussion document.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1/2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies. (2002).Mathematics K-6 Syllabus. Sydney: Board of Studies NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappan, M., & Chandler, P. (2010). Managing cognitive load in the mathematics classroom.The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappan, M., & Thomas, M. (2003). Teachers’ function schemas and their role in modelling.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad, L. (2006). Paper folding in the middle school classroom.Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(1), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. (2003). Reconciling theory, research and practice: A models and modelling perspective.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(2/3), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995).Mathematics education: Models and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2006). Identifying key transition activities for enhanced engagement in mathematical modelling. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.),Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 273–245). Adelaide: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. English (Ed.),Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed.) (pp. 176–201). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics.Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H.C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In F. Lester (Ed.),Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 111–155). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education.Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.),Future of the teaching and learning of algebra: the 12th ICMI study (pp. 21–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. (2006). New directions for research on mathematical problem solving. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.),Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra, Vol. 1, pp. 15–34). Adelaide: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1975). Information processing variables in learning to solve problems,Review of Educational Research, 45(4), 525–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy and disposition in students.Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. Anderson, R. Spiro & W. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985).Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seino, T. (2005). Understanding the role of assumptions in mathematical modeling: Analysis of lessons with emphasis on ‘the awareness of assumptions’. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.),Building connections: Theory, research and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, Vol. 2, pp. 664–671). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, G. (2004). Strategies employed by upper secondary students for overcoming or exploiting conditions affecting accessibility of application tasks.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2008). Research into the teaching and learning of applications and modeling in Australasia. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.),Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004-2007 (p. 141–164). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning, problem solving in mathematics and science.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S. (2007). Problem-based learning pedagogies: Psychological processes and enhancement of intelligences.Educational Research Policy and Practice, 6(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mohan Chinnappan, Faculty of Education, The University of Wollongong, 2522, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

    Mohan Chinnappan

Authors
  1. Mohan Chinnappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chinnappan, M. Cognitive load and modelling of an algebra problem. Math Ed Res J 22, 8–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217563

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217563

Keywords

Search

Navigation