Abstract
Factors influencing grooming site preferences in adult female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) were investigated. The females belonged to a free-ranging harem troop (Jodhpur, India) and were observed for 569 hr by focal-female sampling. Decisive factors for grooming site preferences were the following: autogrooming was determined mostly by site accessiblity. Allogrooming was significantly concentrated on parts that are inaccessible to the groomee. Close female kin groomed significantly longer, more frequently, and more precisely at inaccessible body parts. Lower-ranking females were groomed significantly less often and more briefly but also more precisely at inaccessible parts. However, the latter might be due to a lower-ranking subjects desire to face away from the higher-ranking groomer in order to avoid eye contact. The data suggest that the groomee determines the sites being groomed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. (1974). The evolution of animal behavior.Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 5: 325–383.
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227–267.
Barton, R. (1985). Grooming site preferences in primates and their functional implications.Int. J. Primatol. 6: 519–532.
Bernstein, I. S., Rose, R. M., and Gordon, T. P. (1977). Behavioral and hormonal responses of male rhesus monkeys introduced to females in the breeding and nonbreeding season.Anim. Behav. 25: 609–614.
Boccia, M. L. (1983). A functional analysis of social grooming patterns through direct comparison with self-grooming in rhesus monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 4 399–418.
Boccia, M. L. (1986). Grooming site preferences as a form of tactile communication and their role in the social relations of rhesus monkeys. In Taub, D. M., and King, F. A. (eds.),Current Perspectives in Primate Social Dynamics, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 505–518.
Boccia, M. L. (1989). Comparison of the physical characteristics of grooming in two species of macaques (Macaca nemestrina andM. radiata).J. Comp. Psychol. 103: 177–183.
Boccia, M. L., Rockwood, B., and Novack, M. (1982). The influence of behavioral context and social characteristics on the physical aspects of social grooming in rhesus monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 91–108.
Boccia, M. L., Reite, M., and Laudenslager, M. (1989). On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque.Phys. Behav. 43: 667–670.
Borries, C. (1988). Patterns of grandmaternal behaviour in free-ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Hum. Evol. 3: 239–260.
Borries, C. (1989). Mothers and adult daughters—on kinship in free-ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primate Rep. 25: 10.
Borries, C., Sommer, V., and Srivastava, A. (1991). Dominance, age, and reproductive success in free-ranging female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Int. J. Primatol. 3: 1–28.
Borries, C., Sommer, V., and Srivastava, A. (1992). Allogrooming in free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus) (in preparation).
Carpenter, L. R. (1942). Sexual behavior of free ranging rhesus monkeysMacaca mulatta.J. Comp. Psychol. 33: 113–142.
Coelho, A. M., Turner, S. A., and Bramblett, C. A. (1983). Allogrooming and social status: An assessment of the contributions of female behavior to the social organization of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas).Primates 24: 184–197.
Dixson, A. F., Scruton, D. M., and Herbert, J. (1975). Behaviour of the talapoin monkey (Miopithecus talapoin) studied in groups in the laboratory.J. Zool. 176: 177–210.
Drickamer, L. C. (1976). Quantitative observations of grooming behaviour in free-rangingMacaca mulatta.Primates 17: 323–335.
Fairbanks, L. A. (1980). Relationships among females in captive vervet monkeys: testing a model of rank-related attractiveness.Anim. Behav. 28: 853–859.
Freeland, W. J. (1976). Pathogens and the evolution of primate sociality.Biotrop. 8: 12–24.
Furuya, Y. (1957). Grooming behaviour in the wild Japanese monkeys.Primates 1: 47–68.
Goosen, C. (1987). Social grooming in primates. In Mitchell, G., and Erwin, J. (eds.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2, Part B: Behavior, Cognition and Motivation, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 107–131.
Hutchins, M., and Barash, D. P. (1976). Grooming in primates: Implications for its utilitarian function.Primates 17: 145–150.
Jones, C. B. (1979). Grooming in the mantled howler monkey,Alouatta palliata, Gray.Primates 20: 289–292.
Kurland, J. A. (1977). Kin selection in the Japanese monkey.Contr. Primatol, 12, Karger, Basel.
Lindburg, D. G. (1973). Grooming behavior as a regulator of social interactions in rhesus monkeys. In Carpenter, C. R. (ed.),Behavioral Regulators of Behavior in Primates, Buckwell University Press, Lewisburg, Pa., pp. 124–148.
Lopez-Vergara, L., Santillan-Doherty, A. M., Mayagoitia, L., and Mondragon-Ceballos, R. (1989). Self and social grooming in stump-tailed macaques: Effects of kin presence or absence within the group.Behav. Proc. 18: 99–106.
MacKenzie, M., McGrew, W. C., and Charmove, A. S. (1985). Social preferences in stump-tailed macaques (Macaca arctoides): effects of companionship, kinship, and rearing.Dev. Psychobiol. 18: 115–123.
McKenna, J. J. (1978). Biosocial functions of grooming behavior among the common Indian langur monkey (Presbytis entellus).Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 48: 503–510.
Mehlman, P. T., and Chapais, B. (1988). Differential effects of kinship, dominance, and the mating season on female allogrooming in a captive group ofMacaca fuscata.Primates 29: 195–217.
Michael, R. P., and Herbert, J. (1963). Menstrual cycle influences grooming behavior and sexual activity in the rhesus monkey.Science 140: 500–501.
Poirier, F. E. (1970). The Nilgiri langur (Presbytis johnii), of south India. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.)Primate Behavior, Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 254–383.
Sade, D. S. (1965). Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 23: 1–18.
Sambraus, H. H. (1978).Nutztierethologie, Parey, Berlin.
Saunders, C. D., and Hausfater, G. (1988). The functional significance of baboon grooming behavior.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 525: 430–432.
Schino, G., Aureli, F., and Troisi, A. (1988). Equivalence between measures of allogrooming: an empirical comparison in three species of macaques.Folia Primatol. 51: 214–219.
Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys.J. Theor. Biol. 65: 671–698.
Smuts, B. B. (1985).Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, New York.
Sommer, V. (1985).Weibliche und männliche Reproduktionsstrategien der Hamuman-Languren, (Presbytis entellus), von Jodhpur, Rajasthan/Indien, Dissertation, University of Göttingen, Göttingen.
Sommer, V. (1987). Infanticide among free-ranging langurs, (Presbytis entellus), at Jodhpur (Rajasthan/India): Recent observations and a reconsideration of hypotheses.Primates 28: 163–197.
Sparks, J. (1967). Allogrooming in primates: A review. In Morris, D. (ed.),Primate Ethology, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp. 148–175.
Terry, R. L. (1970). Primate grooming as a tension reduction mechanism.J. Psychol. 76: 129–136.
Troisi, A., and Schino, G. (1987). Environmental and social influences on autogrooming behaviour in a captive group of Java monkeysBehaviour 100: 292–302.
Turillazzi, P. G., Marchini, S., Alessandroni, P., Baldo, N., Campanella, C., and Trucch, D. (1982). Social grooming inMacaca fuscata.Ann. Inst. Sup. Sanita 18: 239–250.
Vogel, C. (1988). Sociobiology of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus): Introduction into the Jodhpur field project.Hum. Evol. 3: 217–226.
Weber, J. (1973). Tactile communication among free-ranging langurs.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 38: 481–486.
Winkler, P. (1984). The adaptive capacities of the Hanuman langur and the categorizing of diet. In Chivers, D. J., Wood, B. A., and Bilsborough, A. (eds.),Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 161–166.
Winkler, P. (1988a). Feeding behavior of a food enhanced troop of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) in Jodhpur, India. In Fa, J. E., and Southwick, C. H. (eds.),The Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 3–24.
Winkler, P. (1988b). Troop history, female reproductive strategies and timing of male change in Hanuman langures,Presbytis entellus.Hum. Evol. 3: 227–237.
Wu, H. M. H., Holmes, W. G., Medina, S. R., and Sackett, G. P. (1980) Kin preferences in infantMacaca nemestrina.Nature 285: 225–277.
Young, G. H., Coelho, A. M., Jr., and Bramblett, C. A. (1982). The development of grooming, sociosexual behavior, play and aggression in captive baboons in their first two years.Primates 23: 511–519.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borries, C. Grooming site preferences in female langurs (Presbytis entellus). International Journal of Primatology 13, 19–32 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547725
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547725