Skip to main content
Log in

Rigid biological composite materials: Structural examples for biomimetic design

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological hard tissues are composites of inorganics and biopolymers, and, therefore, represent hybrid systems. The inorganic components may be oxides (e.g., SiO2, Fe3O4), carbonates (e.g., CaCO3) sulfides (e.g., FeS, CdS), or others, mostly in crystalline forms but also occasionally in glassy forms. The biopolymer is often proteinaceous, but can also involve lipids and especially polysaccharides (e.g., chitin). These hybrid materials can be found in single celled organisms (such as bacteria and protozoa), invertebrates (such as mollusks), insects (such as beetles), and vertebrates (such as mammals). A common denominator of all hard tissues is that they are hierarchically structured from the nanometer scale to the microscale and the macroscale. It is these controlled structures that give biological hard tissues their unique and highly evolved functional properties. The engineering properties include mechanical, piezoelectric, optical, and magnetic. The hard tissues can be in the form of nanoparticles, spines, spicules, skeletons, and shells. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate mechanical aspects of some of these hard tissues, to discuss their structure-function relationships (with examples from the literature as well as from our research), and to reveal their potential utility in materials science and engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowenstam, H.A., “Biominerals,”Science,211,1126–1131 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simkiss, K., andWilbur, K.M., “Biomineralization,”New York:Academic Press (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wainwright, S.A., Biggs, W.D., Currey, J.D., andGosline, J.M., “Mechanical Design in Organisms,”Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sarikaya, M., andAksay, I.A., “Biomimetics: Design and Processing of Materials,”38–90, American Institute of Physics, New York (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Materials Advisory Board, Committee on Hierarchical Structures, “Hierarchical Structures in Biology as a Guide for New Materials Technology,”NMAB-464,62,Washington, DC:National Academy Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vincent, J.F.V., “Structural Biomaterialrevised ed., Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Currey, J.D., “Mechanical Properties of Mollusk Shell,”in Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, Vol. XXXIV. The Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials, 77, London, UK:Cambridge University Press (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sarikaya, M., andAksay, I.A., “Mother-of-Pearl: Structure, Mechanical Properties, and Formation,”Biopolymers,1,1–25 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., andTurner, R.M., “Comparison of Nacre with Other Ceramic Composites,”J. Mater. Sci.,25,3173–3185 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., andTurner, R.M., “The Mechanical Design of Nacre,”Proc. R. Soc. B,234,415–430 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menig, R., Meyers, M.H., Meyers, M.A., andVecchio, K.S., “Quasistatic and Dynamic Mechanical Response of Haliotis Rufescens (Red Abalone) Shells,”Acta Mater.,48,2383–2398 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, R.Z., et al., “Deformation Mechanisms in Nacre,”J. Mater. Res.,16,2485–2493 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, A.G., et al., “Model for the Robust Mechanical Behavior of Nacre,”J. Mater. Res.,16,2475–2484 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. “Engineered Materials Handbook,” 417, ASM International, Metals Park, OH (1995).

  15. Kamat, S., Su, X., Ballarini, R., andHeuer, A.H., “Structural Basis for the Fracture Toughness of the Shell of the Conch,”Nature,405,1036–1040 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarikaya, M., et al., “Biomimetic Model of a Sponge-Spicular Optical Fiber-Mechanical Properties and Structure,”J. Mater. Res.,16,1420–1428 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly, A., andDavies, G.J., “The Principles of Fiber Reinforcement of Metals,”Metall. Rev.,10,12 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Broutman, L.J., andKrock, R.H., “Modern Composite Materials,”13, Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, R.M., “Mechanics of Composite Materials,”Washington, DC:Scripta Book Co. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, S., Wadsworth, J., andSherby, O.D., “Tensile Properties of Laminated Composites Based on Ultrahigh Carbon Steel,”J. Comput. Mater.,25,842–853 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ker, R.F., “Some Structural and Mechanical Properties of Locust and Beetle Cuticle,”D. Phil. Thesis, Oxford, UK:University of Oxford (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Padawer, G.E., andBeecher, N., “On the Strength and Stiffness of Planar Reinforced Plastic Resins,”Polym. Eng. Sci.,10,185 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riley, V.R., “Fibre-Fibre Interaction,”J. Comput. Mater.,2,436 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ashton, J.E., Halpin, J.C., andPetit, P.H., “Primer on Composite Materials: Analysis,”Westport, CN:Technomic Press (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hull, D., “An Introduction to Composite Materials,”London:Cambridge University Press (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Staab, G.H., “Laminar Composites,”Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gunderson, S.L., and Whitney, J.M., “Analysis of a Composite Laminate Having a Novel Unsymmetrical Ply Orientation,” Proc. 6th Technical Conf., Lancaster, PA, 309–318, American Society of Composites (1991).

  28. Gunderson, S.L., andWhitney, J.M., “A Controlled Unsymmetrical Orientation for Improved Isotropic Properties,”in Advances in Composite Mechanics and Biomimetics, Proc. ASME Winter Meeting, AD29/AMD146, 99–109, ASME, New York (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, L.J., andAshby, M.F., “Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties,”17,Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schwartz, D.S., Shih, D.S., Evans, A.G., andWadley, H.N.G. (eds), “Porous and Cellular Materials for Structural Applications,”Proc. MRS Symposium, vol. 521, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frisch, K.C., andSaunders, J.H. (eds), “Plastic Foams,”M. Dekker, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent, J.F.V., “Nutsin Proc. MRS Symposium,292,35–43,Materials Research Society,Warrendale, PA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson, D.W., “On Growth and Form,”new ed., 981, Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fong, H., Sarikaya, M., White, S.N., andSnead, M.L., “Nonomechanical Properties Profiles across DEJ of Human Incisor Tooth,”J. Mater. Sci. Eng., C,7,119–128 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayer, G., Sarikaya, M. Rigid biological composite materials: Structural examples for biomimetic design. Experimental Mechanics 42, 395–403 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412144

Key Words

Navigation