Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Density-dependence provides a causal link between processes acting at different levels of ecological organization. The linkage between density-dependent habitat use, population regulation and community organization is examined on the basis of qualitative and quantitative differences between habitats. These differences are expressed as characteristic shapes on isodars which are lines of equal fitness, and are plotted in density space as lines at every point of which the fitness of individuals in one habitat is equal to that of individuals in another. Isodars can be constructed for single species or modified to include the effects of interacting species. Isodars are easily analyzed by linear regression to differentiate between alternative modes of population regulation and to suggest patterns of community structure. Different isodars are causally related to different kinds of community structure, and suggest the existence of four new forms of community organization; equal, differential, switched and mixed preferences. A preliminary isodar analysis on a common rodent species demonstrates that population regulation depends upon habitat, and that mixed preferences probably organize the rodent community. Habitat-dependent population regulation has farreaching implications to studies of temporal and spatial scale, and to all ecological processes that are density-dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P. K. (1970) Ecological structure and gene flow in small mammals.Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 26, 295–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1986) Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments.J. Theor. Biol. 123, 151–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, R. (1987) A generalized habitat matching rule.Evol. Ecol. 1, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development.Acta Biother. 19, 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D. (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution.Theor. Pop. Biol. 28, 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments.Ecol. Monog. 54, 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W. Z. Jr (1975) The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. InSmall Mammals: Their Production and Population Dynamics (F. B. Golley, K. Petrusewicz and L. Ryszkowski, eds), pp. 103–28. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W. Z. Jr. (1985) Dispersal. InBiology of New World Microtus (R. H. Tamarin, ed.),pp. 420–54.Amer. Soc. Mammal, Spec. Publ. 8.

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1972)Geographical Ecology. Harper & Row. NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1983). Field tests of competitive interference for space among temperate-zone rodents.Canad. J. Zool. 61, 1517–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1984a) Sexual differences in habitat use by small mammals: evolutionary strategy or reproductive constraint?Oecologia 65, 51–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1984b) Patterns and scale of habitat use in two temperate-zone small mammal faunas.Canad. J. Zool. 62, 1540–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1987a) Ecological scale and habitat use.Ecology 68, 362–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1987b) Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment.Ecol. Monog. 57, 267–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1987c) Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection.Evol. Ecol. 1, 379–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1981) Competition and habitat use.Oikos 37, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L., Rosenzweig, M. L. and Mitchell, W. (1985) Competition and food selection: field tests of a theory.Ecology 66, 798–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1974) On the evolution of habitat selection.Pr. 1st Int. Cong. Ecol. 401–4.

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1979) Optimal habitat selection in two-species competitive systems.Fort. Zool. 25, 283–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection.Ecology 62, 327–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1985) Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In:Habitat Selection in Birds (M. L. Cody, ed.) pp. 517–40. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. Habitat selection, community organization and small mammal studies. InPatterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities (D. W. Morris, Z. Abramsky, B. J. Fox and M. R. Willig, eds).Spec. Publ. Mus. Texas Tech Univ. (in press).

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. and Abramsky, Z. (1985) Detecting density-dependent habitat selection.Amer. Natur. 126, 405–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. and Abramsky, Z. (1986) Centrifugal community organization.Oikos 46, 339–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, G. D. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1975) Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilization betweenDipodomys ordii andDipodomys merriami.Oecologia 19, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. H., Manlove, M. N. and Joule, J. (1978) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the genetic organization of small mammal populations. InPopulations of Small Mammals Under Natural Conditions (D. P. Snyder, ed.), pp. 99–113.Pymat. Lab. Ecol. Spec. Publ. 5.

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981)Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W. W. and Parker, K. R. (1986) Environmental impact assessment: ‘pseudoreplication’ in time?Ecology 67, 929–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, B. (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality.J. Wildlife Mgemnt. 47, 893–901.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, D.W. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol Ecol 2, 253–269 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214286

Keywords

Navigation