Skip to main content
Log in

Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterflyPieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males of the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.) transfer large ejaculates that represent on average 15% of their body mass when mating for a first time. Shortly after mating a male is able to transfer only a small ejaculate when mating a second time. Male ejaculate production plays a crucial role in the mating system ofP. napi because females use male-derived nutrients for egg production and somatic maintenance. Here we study how timing of female rematings and copulation duration are influenced by the mating history of their mates and, also, study if females exert mate choice to minimize their mating costs. Mating with a recently mated male increased female mating costs by increasing time in copula and mating frequency. Virgin females that mated with virgin males remated after an average of 6 days, whereas virgin females that mated with recently mated males remated after an average of 2 days. Moreover, copulations involving recently mated males lasted on average almost 7 h, whereas copulations involving virgin males lasted on average 2 h. Recently mated males were eager to remate, in spite of the fact that the size of the ejaculate they transfer is small and that they remain in copula for a long time. Hence it seems that males are more successful in the sexual conflict over mating decisions and that females do not minimize mating costs by choosing to mate preferentially with virgin males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boggs, C. L. (1979). Life history and nutritional determinants of resource allocation in holometabolous insects.Am. Nat. 117: 692–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. L. (1981). Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investment at mating in heliconiine butterflies.Evolution 35: 931–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. L., and Gilbert, L. E. (1979). Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: Evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating.Science 206: 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. L., and Watt, W. B. (1981). Population structure of pierid butterflies. IV. Genetic and physiological investment of offspring by maleColias.Oecologia (Berl.) 50: 320–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droney, D. C. (1992). Sexual selection in a lekking HawaiianDrosophila: The roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success.Anim. Behav. 44: 1007–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M. D. (1982). The question of paternal investment in Lepidoptera: Male contributed proteins inPlodia interpunctella.Int. J. Invert. Reprod. 5: 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, J., and Wiklund, C. (1988). Protandry in the green-veined white butterfly,Pieris napi L. (Lepidoptera; Pieridae).Functional Ecology 2: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, J., and Wiklund, C. (1989). Mating in the afternoon: Time-saving in courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, A., and Wiklund, C. (1994). Polyandeous female butterflies forage for matings.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, K. S. (1988). Male monarch butterfly spermatophore mass and mating strategies.Anim. Behav. 36: 1384–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, K. S. (1988). Male monarch butterfly spermatophore mass and mating strategies.Anim. Behav. 36: 1384–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, K. S. (1989). Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, K. S. (1992). Rate of ejaculate and intermating intervals in monarch butterflies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., and Farquhar, M. (1983). Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size.Anim. Behav. 31: 871–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., Hoffman, A., and Jones, J. S. (1987). Male size and mating success inDrosophila melanogaster andD. pseudoobscura under field conditions.Anim. Behav. 35: 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L. (1979). The butterfly as an honest salesman.Anim. Behav. 27: 1269–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L. (1980). Courtship solicitation by females of the checkered white butterfly,Pieris protodice.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L. (1984). Production and use of secretions passed at males at copulation inPieris protodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).Psyche 91: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L., and Gilchrist, G. W. (1986). Copulation inColias eurytheme (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): Pattern and frequency.J. Zool. 209: 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L., Long, C. E., Marshall, L. D., and Vetter, R. S. (1981). Courtship solicitation byColias females.Am. Midl. Nat. 105: 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L., Newton, M., and Schaefer, J. (1983). Interspecific variation in the size of the nutrient investment made by male butterflies during copulation.Evolution 37: 708–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. S. (1979). Aspects of mating frequency and reproductive maturity inPapilio zelicaon.Am. Midl. Nat. 102: 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, T. (1979). Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterflyPieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behaviour.J. Comp. Physiol. 130: 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd, L., and Wiklund, C. (1986). Different ejaculate delivery strategies in first versus subsequent matings in the swallowtail butterflyPapilio machaon L.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd, L., and Wiklund, C. (1989). Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M. (1988). Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly,Papilio xuthus L. in summer generations.J. Insect Behav. 1: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O. (1985). Male determined mating duration in butterflies?J. Lepid. Soc. 39: 341–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiernasz, D. C. (1989). Female choice and sexual selection of male wing melanin pattern inPieris occidentalis.Evolution 43: 1672–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C., and Forsberg, J. (1991). Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: A comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae.Oikos 60: 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C., and Kaitala, A.: (1995). Sexual selection for large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: The effect of body size on male vs female reproductive success inPieris napi.Behav. Ecol. 6: 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C., Kaitala, A., Lindfors, V., and Abenius, J. (1993). Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterflyPieris napi.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1987). Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 41: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaitala, A., Wiklund, C. Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterflyPieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J Insect Behav 8, 355–363 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01989364

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01989364

Key words

Navigation