Skip to main content
Log in

Systems of ordering data

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four ordering systems have been used most frequently in taxonomy: (1) special purpose classifications, (2) downward classifications (identification schemes), (3) upward or grouping classifications (traditional), and (4) Hennigian phylogenetic systems. The special properties of these four systems are critically evaluated. Grouping classifications and phylogenetic systems have very different objectives: the former the documentation of similarity and closeness of relationship, the latter of phylogeny. Both are legitimate ordering systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adanson, M.: 1763,Familles des Plantes, vol. 1. Paris, Vincent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ax, P.: 1987,The Phylogenetic System, Chichester, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J.: 1974, ‘Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary Taxonomy’,Syst. Zool. 22, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. F., E. J. Browne, and R. Porter: 1981,Dictionary of the History of Science. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charig, A. J.: 1982, in Joysey, K. A. & Friday, A. E. (eds.),Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, London and New York, Academic Press, pp. 363–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. R. and E. Nagel: 1948,An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York, Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A.: 1987, ‘A Botanical Critique of Cladism’,Bot. Rev. 53, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859,On the Origin of Species, Lond, Murray, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1887,Life and Letters, London, Murray, vol. 2, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K., & Gauthier, J.: 1990, ‘Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names’,Syst. Zool. 39, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘SystematicS and the Darwinian Revolution’,Phil Sci. 55, 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K.: 1992, ‘Phylogenetic Definitions and Taxonomic Philosophy’,Biol. & Phil. 7, 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, L.: 1921, ‘Die Methoden der Phytographie und der Systematik der Pflanzen’, Abderhalden, Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden. Abt. XI, Teil 1, Heft 2: 67–190.

  • Farris, J. S.: 1974, ‘Formal Definitions of Paraphyly and Polyphyly’,Syst. Zool. 23, 548–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.: 1981, ‘Categories, Life, and Thinking’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J. S. L.: 1940 ‘Taxonomy and Philosophy’ in Huxley, J. S. (ed.),The New Systematics, Oxford, Clarendon, pp. 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, G. C. D.: 1974, ‘On the Foundations of Biological Systematics’,Acta Biotheoretica 23, 85–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1950,Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik, Berlin, Deutscher Zentralverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1966,Phylogenetic Systematics, trans. Davis, D. D. & Zangerl, R., Urbana, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1974, ‘Critical Comments on the Question “Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?”’,Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 12, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1975, ‘“Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?”: A Reply to Ernst Mayr’,Syst. Zool. 24, 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S.: 1888,Principles of Science. London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. & Ashlock, P. D.: 1991,Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd ed, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1981, ‘Biological Classification: Toward a Synthesis of Opposing Methodologies’,Science 214, 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, New York, Harcourt, Brace, World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.: 1981,Theories and Things, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, J.: 1989, ‘Critical Remarks to Cladistic Analysis and Cladistic Classification’,Abh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg (NF) 28, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindewolf, O. H.: 1969, ‘Über den “Typus” in der Morphologischen und Phylogenetischen Biologie’, Akad. Wissensch. Mainz-Abh.Math-Nat. Kl. 4, 58–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, J. J. and D. C. Kendrick: 1993, ‘Numerical Experiments with Model Monphyletic and Paraphyletic Taxa’,Paleobiology 19, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1961,Principles of Animal Taxonomy, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and R. R. Sokal: 1973,Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1840,Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences 1, 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N.: 1925,Science and the Modern World. New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1979, ‘An Annotated Linnean hierarchy, with Comments on Natural Taxa and Competing Systems’,Syst. Zool. 28: 308–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1981,Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese, C. R.: 1987, ‘Bacterial Evolution’,Microbiol. Rev. 51, 221–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayr, E. Systems of ordering data. Biol Philos 10, 419–434 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857592

Key words

Navigation