Skip to main content
Log in

Why do anemonefishes inhabit only some host actinians?

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The 25 species ofAmphiprion and one ofPremnas (family Pomacentridae) are obligate symbionts of 10 species of facultatively symbiotic sea anemones. Throughout the tropical Indo-West Pacific range of the relationship, a fish species inhabits only certain of the hosts potentially available to it. This specificity is due to the fishes. Five fishes occupy six sea anemone species at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia.Entacmaea quadricolor harborsP. biaculeatus, A. melanopus andA. akindynos. Adults ofPremnas occur deeper than about 3 m in large, primarily solitary actinians; juveniles may occupy peripheral members ofEntacmaea clones in shallow water. Specimens ofA. melanopus live exclusively in clonal anemones, which are found no deeper than 3 m. Most individuals ofA. akindynos inEntacmaea are juveniles, occurring shallow and deep, in solitary anemones or at the margins of clones. Interspecific as well as intraspecific social control of growth may be responsible for keeping fish small at clone fringes. Conspicuous specimens ofE. quadricolor depend upon their anemonefish to survive. Actinians cleared of symbionts disappeared within 24 h, probably having been eaten by reef fishes.Entacmaea, the most abundant and widespread host actinian at Lizard Island and throughout the range of the association, is also arguably the most attractive to anemonefishes. I believe its vulnerability to predation was a factor in its evolving whatever makes it desirable to fishes. Experimental transfers pitted fish of one species against those of another, controlling for ecophenotype of host, and sex, size and number of fish. Competitive superiority was in the same order as abundance and over-all host specificity:P. biaculeatus, A. melanopus, A. akindynos. At least three factors are necessary to explain patterns of species specificity - innate or learned host preference, competition, and stochastic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Allen, G.R. 1972. The anemonefishes: their classification and biology. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 288 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G.R. 1980. The anemonefishes of the world: species, care and breeding. Aquarium Systems, Mentor. 104 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, R.L. & H. Dingle. 1975. Ecology and evolution of agonistic behavior in stomatopods. Naturwissenschaften 62: 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, R.L. & H. Dingle. 1979. The influence of size differential on agonistic encounters in the mantis shrimp,Gonodactylus viridis. Behaviour 69: 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, D. & K.S. Norris. 1958. Observations on the symbiosis of the sea anemoneStoichactis and the pomacentrid fish,Amphiprion percula. Biol. Bull. 115: 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. & M.E. Gilpin. 1982. Examination of the ‘null’ model of Connor and Simberloff for species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52: 64–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle, H., R.C. Highsmith, K.E. Evans & R.L. Caldwell. 1973. Interspecific aggressive behavior in tropical reef stomatopods and its possible ecological significance. Oecologia 13: 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D.F. 1981. The clownfish sea anemones: Stichodactylidae (Coelenterata: Actiniaria) and other sea anemones symbiotic with pomacentrid fishes. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 71: 1–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1960. Beobachtungen und Versuche an Anemonenfischen (Amphiprion) der Malediven und der Nicobaren. Z. Tierpsychol. 17: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fautin, D.G. 1984. Competition by anemonefishes for a preferred host actinian (abstract). Amer. Zool. 24: 102A.

  • Fishelson, L. 1965. Observations and experiments on the Red Sea anemones and their symbiotic fishAmphiprion bicinctus. Bull. Isr. Sea Fish. Res. Sta. (Haifa) 39: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, H.W. 1974. Öko-Ethologie des monogamen AnemonenfischesAmphiprion bicinctus (Freiwasseruntersuchung aus dem Roten Meer). Z. Tierpsychol. 36: 429–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, H.W. 1975. Selektives Feinderkennen bei dem AnemonenfischAmphiprion bicinctus (Rüppell). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 19: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, H.W. 1979. Mating system, resource defence and sex change in the anemonefishAmphiprion akallopisos. Z. Tierpsychol. 50: 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. & J.M. Diamond. 1982. Factors contributing to non-randomness in species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52: 75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, G. 1964. Zur Anemonen-Fisch-Symbiose, nach Freilanduntersuchungen bei Eilat/Rotes Meer. Z. Tierpsychol. 21: 468–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herre, A.W.C.T. 1936. Some habits ofAmphiprion in relation to sea anemones. Copeia 1936: 167–168.

  • Kaufmann, J.H. 1983. On the definitions and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biol. Rev. 58: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariscal, R.N. 1966. The symbiosis between tropical sea anemones and fishes: a review. pp. 157–171. In: R.I. Bowman (ed.) The Galapagos: Proceedings of the Symposia of the Galapagos International Scientific Project, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariscal, R.N. 1970. The nature of the symbiosis between Indo-Pacific anemone fishes and sea anemones. Mar. Biol. 6: 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariscal, R.N. 1972. Behavior of symbiotic fishes and sea anemones. pp. 327–360. In: H.E. Winn & B.L. Olla (ed.) Behavior of Marine Animals, Volume 2, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York.

  • Moyer, J.T. 1980. Influence of temperate waters on the behavior of the tropical anemonefishAmphiprion clarkii at Miyake-Jima, Japan. Bull. Mar. Sci. 30: 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J.T. & L.J. Bell. 1976. Reproductive behavior of the anemonefishAmphiprion clarkii at Miyake-Jima, Japan. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 23: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J.T. & C.E. Sawyers. 1973. Territorial behavior of the anemonefishAmphiprion xanthurus with notes on the life history. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 20: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R.M. 1978. Territorial behavior and ecology of the anemonefishAmphiprion melanopus on Guam. Z. Tierpsychol. 46: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P.F. 1980. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 18: 367–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichter, D. 1968a. Der Nesselschutz der Anemonenfische. Verh. Deutsch. Zool. Gesell. 32: 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichter, D. 1968b. Das Zusammenleben von Riffanemonen und Anemonenfischen. Z. Tierpsychol. 25: 933–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwey, J. 1930. Coral reef studies. I. The symbiosis between damselfishes and sea anemones in Batavia Bay. Treubia 12: 305–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fautin, D.G. Why do anemonefishes inhabit only some host actinians?. Environ Biol Fish 15, 171–180 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002992

Keywords

Navigation