Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationships between Design, Students’ Affective States, and Disengaged Behaviors within an ITS

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Abstract

Recent research has shown that differences in software design and content are associated with differences in how much students game the system and go off-task. In particular the design features of a tutor have found to predict substantial amounts of variance in gaming and off-task behavior. However, it is not yet understood how this influence takes place. In this paper we investigate the relationship between a student’s affective state, their tendency to engage in disengaged behavior, and the design aspects of the learning environments, towards understanding the role that affect plays in this process. To investigate this question, we integrate an existing taxonomy of the features of tutor lessons [3] with automated detectors of affect [8]. We find that confusion and frustration are significantly associated with lesson features which were found to be associated with disengaged behavior in past research. At the same time, we find that the affective state of engaged concentration is significantly associated with features associated with lower frequencies of disengaged behavior. This analysis suggests that simple re-designs of tutors along these lines may lead to both better affect and less disengaged behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.R.: Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 227–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., Christopherson, R.: Emotion Sensors Go To School. In: Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, R.S.J.d.: Differences Between Intelligent Tutor Lessons, and the Choice to Go Off-Task. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l. Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 11–20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, R.S.J.d.: Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1059–1068 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, R.S.J.d., de Carvalho, A.M.J.A.: Labeling Student Behavior Faster and More Precisely with Text Replays. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 38–47 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R.S.J.d., de Carvalho, A.M.J.A., Raspat, J., Aleven, V., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Educational Software Features that Encourage and Discourage “Gaming the System”. In: Proc. of the 14th Int’l. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 475–482 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, R.S.J.d., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to Be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States during Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, R.S.J.d., Gowda, S.M., Wixon, M., Kalka, J., Wagner, A.Z., Salvi, A., Aleven, V., Kusbit, G., Ocumpaugh, J., Rossi, L.: Sensor-free automated detection of affect in a Cognitive Tutor for Algebra. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 126–133 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R.S.J.d., Moore, G.R., Wagner, A.Z., Kalka, J., Salvi, A., Karabinos, M., Ashe, C.A., Yaron, D.: The Dynamics Between Student Affect and Behavior Occuring Outside of Educational Software. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6974, pp. 14–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, R.S.J.d., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., Roll, I., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K.: Why Students Engage in “Gaming the System” Behavior in Interactive Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19(2), 185–224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beal, C.R., Qu, L., Lee, H.: Mathematics motivation and achievement as predictors of high school students’ guessing and help-seeking with instructional software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24(6), 507–514 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck, J.E., Chang, K.-M., Mostow, J., Corbett, A.: Does Help Help? Introducing the Bayesian Evaluation and Assessment Methodology. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 383–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck, J.: Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement. In: Proc. of 12th Int’l Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 88–95 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57, 289–300 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Cocea, M., Hershkovitz, A., Baker, R.S.J.d.: The Impact of Off-task and Gaming Behaviors on Learning: Immediate or Aggregate? In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 507–514 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning. J. of Educational Media 29, 241–250 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B.: Becoming Adult. Basic Books, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.C.: Multimodal semiautomated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 20(2), 147–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Mello, S.K., Taylor, R., Graesser, A.C.: Monitoring Affective Trajectories during Complex Learning. In: Proc. of the 29th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 203–208 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harp, S.F., Mayer, R.E.: How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90, 414–434 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hastings, P., Arnott-Hill, E., Allbritton, D.: Squeezing out gaming behavior in a dialog-based ITS. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 204–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hershkovitz, A., Baker, R.S.J.d., Gobert, J., Nakama, A.: A Data-driven Path Model of Student Attributes, Affect, and Engagement in a Computer-based Science Inquiry Microworld. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hidi, S., Anderson, V.: Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In: Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A. (eds.) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp. 215–238. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koedinger, K., Corbett, A.: Cognitive Tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 61–78. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krapp, A.: Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction 12(4), 383–409 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, D.M.C., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., Sugay, J.O., Coronel, A.: Exploring the Relationship between Novice Programmer Confusion and Achievement. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6974, pp. 175–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Litman, D.J., Forbes-Riley, K.: Recognizing Student Emotions and Attitudes on the Basis of Utterances in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues with both Human and Computer Tutors. Speech Communication 48(5), 559–590 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: Yale: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 935–940 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Murray, R.C., VanLehn, K.: Effects of dissuading unnecessary help requests while providing proactive help. In: Proc. of the Int’l Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pardos, Z., Baker, R.S.J.d., San Pedro, M.O.Z., Gowda, S.M., Gowda, S.: Affective states and state tests: Investigating how affect throughout the school year predicts end of year learning outcomes. In: To Appear in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perneger, T.V.: What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 316, 1236–1238 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabourin, J., Rowe, J.P., Mott, B.W., Lester, J.C.: When Off-Task is On-Task: The Affective Role of Off-Task Behavior in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 534–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Storey, J.D., Taylor, J.E., Siegmund, D.: Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 66(1), 187–205 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Duyne, D.K., Landay, J.A., Hong, J.I.: The design of sites patterns for creating winning web sites, Upper Saddle River, NY (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doddannara, L.S., Gowda, S.M., Baker, R.S.J.d., Gowda, S.M., de Carvalho, A.M.J.B. (2013). Exploring the Relationships between Design, Students’ Affective States, and Disengaged Behaviors within an ITS. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics