Abstract
This is a case study of a highly regarded high-school mathematics teacher in Israel. It examines the kinds of responses to students’ talk used repeatedly by the teacher, directing and shaping the classroom discourse, during different parts of the lesson. The main data source included 21 h of observations in two of this teacher’s classrooms. Analysis of the video-taped lessons showed that almost the entire whole-class work comprised of mathematical activity that was triggered by, built or followed on, students’ talk. This was mainly due to the teacher’s responsiveness to students. The most common teacher response was elaborating. Accompanying talk occurred considerably less, and the teacher rarely expressed puzzlement or opposition when responding to students’ talk. The chapter demonstrates how the teacher combined her attention to students’ talk, with the goal of making progress on the main topic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397.
Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 263–272.
Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws, T. J. Cooney, D. Jones, (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 27–46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. M. Mangier & C. C. Block, (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161–186). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Brown, C., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws, (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209–239). New York: Macmillan.
Chazzan, D., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 113–163.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1990). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick, (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Even, R. (1999). Integrating academic and practical knowledge in a teacher leaders’ development program. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 235–252.
Even, R. (2005a). Integrating knowledge and practice at MANOR in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(4), 343–357.
Even, R. (2005b). Using assessment to inform instructional decisions: How hard can it be? Mathematics Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 51–67.
Even, R., & Lappan, G. (1994). Constructing meaningful understanding of mathematics content. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford, (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics, 1994 Yearbook (pp. 128–143). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Even, R., & Markovits, Z. (1993). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of functions: Characterization and applications. Journal of Structural Learning, 12(1), 35–51.
Even, R., & Schwarz, B. (2003). Implications of competing interpretations of practice for research and theory in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 283–313.
Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (2002). Teacher knowledge and understanding of students’ mathematical learning. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., Franke, M., Levi, L., Jacobs, V., & Empson, S. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.
Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. (1998). “You’re going to want to find out which and prove it”: Collective argumentation in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527–548.
Fraivilling, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 148–170.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Philadelphia, PA: NCES [CDRom].
Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (students) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 347–366). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A. B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 101–136.
Markovits, Z., & Even, R. (1999). The decimal point situation: A close look at the use of mathematics-classroom-situations in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(6), 653–665.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
O’Connor, M. C. (2001). Can any fraction be turned into decimal? A case study of a mathematical group discussion. In C. Kieren, E. Forman, & A. Sfard, (Eds.), Learning discourse: Discursive approaches to research in mathematics education (pp. 143–185). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347–364.
Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children’s learning processes – Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 157–185.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 205–233.
Simon, A. M. (1997). Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development. In E. Fennema & B. Scott-Nelson, (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 55–86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 5–25.
Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wood, T. (1994). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural perspectives of the mathematics classroom (pp. 149–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Even, R., Gottlib, O. (2011). Responding to Students: Enabling a Significant Role for Students in the Class Discourse. In: Li, Y., Kaiser, G. (eds) Expertise in Mathematics Instruction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7707-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7707-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7706-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7707-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)