skip to main content
10.1145/3419394.3423658acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Lockdown Effect: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Internet Traffic

Published:27 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments imposed lock-downs that forced hundreds of millions of citizens to stay at home. The implementation of confinement measures increased Internet traffic demands of residential users, in particular, for remote working, entertainment, commerce, and education, which, as a result, caused traffic shifts in the Internet core.

In this paper, using data from a diverse set of vantage points (one ISP, three IXPs, and one metropolitan educational network), we examine the effect of these lockdowns on traffic shifts. We find that the traffic volume increased by 15-20% almost within a week---while overall still modest, this constitutes a large increase within this short time period. However, despite this surge, we observe that the Internet infrastructure is able to handle the new volume, as most traffic shifts occur outside of traditional peak hours. When looking directly at the traffic sources, it turns out that, while hypergiants still contribute a significant fraction of traffic, we see (1) a higher increase in traffic of non-hypergiants, and (2) traffic increases in applications that people use when at home, such as Web conferencing, VPN, and gaming. While many networks see increased traffic demands, in particular, those providing services to residential users, academic networks experience major overall decreases. Yet, in these networks, we can observe substantial increases when considering applications associated to remote working and lecturing.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

imc2020-410-long.mp4

mp4

258.5 MB

imc2020-paper410-short.mp4

mp4

44.7 MB

References

  1. N. Bayat, K. Mahajan, S. Denton, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. 2020. Down for Failure: Active Power Status Monitoring. arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Blendin, F. Bendfeldt, I. Poese, B. Koldehofe, and O. Hohlfeld. 2018. Dissecting Apples Meta-CDN during an iOS Update. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Boettger, G. Ibrahim, and B. Vallis. 2020. How the Internet reacted to Covid-19 --- A perspective from Facebooks Edge Network. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Bogutz, Y. Pradkin, and J. Heidemann. 2019. Identifying Important Internet Outages. In IEEE Big Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Böttger, F. Cuadrado, G. Tyson, I. Castro, and S. Uhlig. 2017. A Hypergiants View of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM CCR 47, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Böttger, F. Cuadrado, and S. Uhlig. 2018. Looking for Hypergiants in PeeringDB. ACM CCR 48, 3 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Labovitz. 2019. Internet Traffic 2009-2019. APRICOT 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Partridge, P. Barford, D. D. Clark, S. Donelan, V. Paxson, J. Rexford, and M. K. Vernon. 2003. The Internet Under Crisis Conditions: Learning from September 11. The National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Candela, V. Luconi, and A. Vecchio. 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Internet latency: A large-scale study. Computer Networks 182 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Chiu, B. Schlinker, A. B. Radhakrishnan, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. 2015. Are We One Hop Away from a Better Internet?. In SIGCOMM HotNets.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Cho, C. Pelsser, R. Bush, and Y. Won. 2011. The Japan Earthquake: the impact on traffic and routing observed by a local ISP. In ACM CoNEXT SWID workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cisco. 2012. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/bng/configuration/guide/b_bng_cg42asr9k/b_bng_cg42asr9k_chapter_01.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cisco. 2012. Introduction to Cisco IOS NetFlow - A Technical Overview. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/ios-netflow/prod_white_paper0900aecd80406232.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cisco. 2020. Cisco Annual Internet Report. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cisco. 2020. Network Requirements for Webex Teams Services. https://help.webex.com/en-us/WBX000028782/Network-Requirements-for-Webex-Teams-Services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. Claise, B. Trammell, and P. Aitken. 2013. RFC 7011: Specification of the IPFIX Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cloudflare. 2020. General best practices for load balancing at your origin with Cloudflare. https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/212794707-\General-best-practices-for-load-balancing-at-your-origin-with-Cloudflare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Comcast. 2020. COVID-19 Network Update. https://corporate.comcast.com/covid-19/network.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2020. Commission and European regulators calls on streaming services, operators and users to prevent network congestion. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/commission-and-european-regulators-calls-streaming-services-\operators-and-users-prevent-network.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zoom Video Communications. 2020. Configure Meeting Connector Controller Port Forwarding. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204898919-Configure-Meeting-Connector-Controller-Port-Forwarding.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. DE-CIX. 2020. DE-CIX Virtual Get-together - Focus Middle East & Asia 22 Apr 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPt10aopnsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. DFN. 2020. German National Research and Education Network: COVID-19 New-sticker. https://www.dfn.de/alle-meldungen-aus-dem-newsticker-zur-covid-19-pandemie/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Dischinger, M. Marcon, S. Guha, K. Gummadi, R. Mahajan, and S. Saroiu. 2010. Glasnost: Enabling End Users to Detect Traffic Differentiation. In NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Dobrian, A. Awan, D. Joseph, A. Ganjam, J. Zhan, V. Sekar, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. 2011. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Z. Durumeric, E. Wustrow, and J. A. Halderman. 2013. ZMap: Fast Internet-Wide Scanning and its Security Applications. In USENIX Security Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. T. Favale, F. Soro, M. Trevisan, I. Drago, and M. Mellia. 2020. Campus Traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13569.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Forbes. 2020. Netflix Starts To Lift Its Coronavirus Streaming Restrictions. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnarcher/2020/05/12/netflix-starts-to-lift-its-coronavirus-streaming-restrictions/#7bcba5bf4738.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Riot Games. 2020. League of Legends: Troubleshooting Connection Issues. https://support-leagueoflegends.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752664-Troubleshooting-Connection-Issues.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. L. Garcia-Dorado, A. Finamore, M. Mellia, M. Meo, and M. Munafo. 2012. Characterization of ISP Traffic: Trends, User Habits, and Access Technology Impact. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 9 (2012). Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Google. 2020. COVID-19 Community Mobility Report. https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Google. 2020. Keeping our network infrastructure strong amid COVID-19. https://www.blog.google/inside-google/infrastructure/keeping-our-network-infrastructure-strong-amid-covid-19/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Huang, F. Qian, Y. Guo, Y. Zhou, Q. Xu, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. 2013. An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and Application Behavior on Performance. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. BLINC: Multilevel Traffic Classification in the Dark. 2005. T. Karagiannis and D. Papagiannaki and M. Faloutsos. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. ITU. 2020. Press Release: New 'State of Broadband' report warns of stark inequalities laid bare by COVID-19 crisis. https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR20-2020-broadband-commission.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. S. Krishnan and R. K. Sitaraman. 2012. Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality using Quasi-Experimental Designs. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. C. Labovitz. 2020. Pandemic Impact on Global Internet Traffic. NANOG 79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. C. Labovitz, S. Lekel-Johnson, D. McPherson, J. Oberheide, and F. Jahanian. 2010. Internet Inter-Domain Traffic. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Lakhina, K. Papagiannaki, M. Crovella, C. Diot, E. D. Kolaczyk, and N. Taft. 2004. Structural Analysis of Network Traffic Flows. In ACM SIGMETRICS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. T. Leighton. 2020. Can the Internet keep up with the surge in demand? https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/04/can-the-internet-keep-up-with-the-surge-in-demand.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Lutu, D. Perino, M. Bagnulo, E. Frias-Martinez, and J. Khangosstar. 2020. A Characterization of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Mobile Network Operator Traffic. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. G. Maier, A. Feldmann, V. Paxson, and M. Allman. 2009. On Dominant Characteristics of Residential Broadband Internet Traffic. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. M. McKeay. 2020. Parts of a whole: Effect of COVID-19 on US Internet Traffic. https://blogs.akamai.com/sitr/2020/04/parts-of-a-whole-effect-of-covid-19-on-us-internet-traffic.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. M. McKeay. 2020. The Building Wave of Internet Traffic. https://blogs.akamai.com/sitr/2020/04/the-building-wave-of-internet-traffic.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Microsoft. 2020. Prepare your organizations network for Microsoft Teams. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/prepare-network.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Microsoft. 2020. Which ports need to be open to use Skype on desktop? https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA148/which-ports-need-to-be-open-to-use-skype-on-desktop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Mozilla Foundation. 2020. Public Suffix List. https://publicsuffix.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. RIPE NCC. 2020. RIPE Database Query. https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Netflix. 2020. Reducing Netflix traffic where its needed while maintaining the member experience. https://media.netflix.com/en/company-blog/reducing-netflix-traffic-where-its-needed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. J. S. Otto, M. Sánchez, D. Choffnes, F. Bustamante, and G. Siganos. 2011. On Blind Mice and the Elephant: Understanding the Network Impact of a Large Distributed System. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. R. Padmanabhan, A. Schulman, D. Levin, and N. Spring. 2019. Residential Links Under the Weather. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. PeeringDB. 2020. PeeringDB. https://www.peeringdb.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. E. Pujol, I. Poese, J. Zerwas, G. Smaragdakis, and A. Feldmann. 2019. Steering Hyper-Giants Traffic at Scale. In Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. REDImadrid. 2020. REDImadrid. https://www.redimadrid.es/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. M. H. Ribeiro, K. Gligoric, M. Peyrard, F. Lemmerich, M. Strohmaier, and R. West. 2020. Sudden Attention Shifts on Wikipedia Following COVID-19 Mobility Restrictions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. J. Rüth, I. Poese, C. Dietzel, and O. Hohlfeld. 2018. A First Look at QUIC in the Wild. In PAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. B. Sanghani. 2020. COVID-19 & IXPs. RIPE 80, https://ripe80.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/27-ripe80-covid-ixp-1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. B. Schilz and R. Maunier. 2020. Experience on deploying a new remote PoP during COVID-19 restriction. RIPE 80, https://ripe80.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/26-Volterra-Ripe-connect-presentation.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. B. Schlinker, H. Kim, T. Cui, E. Katz-Bassett, H. V. Madhyastha, I. Cunha, J. Quinn, S. Hasan, P. Lapukhov, and H. Zeng. 2017. Engineering Egress with Edge Fabric: Steering Oceans of Content to the World. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. M. Z. Shafiq, L. Ji, A. X. Liu, and J. Wang. 2011. Characterizing and ModelingInternet Traffic Dynamics of Cellular Devices. In ACM SIGMETRICS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Arunan Sivanathan, Hassan Habibi Gharakheili, and Vijay Sivaraman. 2018. Can We Classify an IoT Device using TCP Port Scan? 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAFS.2018.8913346Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. J. Snijders. 2020. Internet Network Operations during Pandemics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFeVlzBxICcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Telegeography. 2020. State of the Network: Updates on Covid-19. https://www2.telegeography.com/network-impact.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. C. Timberg. 2020. The Washington Post, April 6, 2020 YourInternetisworking.ThanktheseColdWar-erapioneerswhodesignedittohandlealmostanything.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. M. Trevisan, D. Giordano, I. Drago, M. Mellia, and M. Munafo. 2018. Five Years at the Edge: Watching Internet from the ISP Network. In CoNEXT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. A. V. Vu, J. Hughes, I. Pete, B. Collier, Y. T. Chua, I. Shumailov, and A. Hutchings. 2020. Turning Up the Dial: the Evolution of a Cybercrime Market Through Set-up, Stable, and COVID-19 Eras. In ACM IMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. H. Xie, Y. R. Yang, A. Krishnamurthy, Y. G. Liu, and A. Silberschatz. 2008. P4P: Provider Portal for Applications. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Q. Xu, J. Huang, Z. Wang, F. Qian, A. Gerber, and Z. M. Mao. 2011. Cellular Data Network Infrastructure Characterization and Implication on Mobile Content Placement. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. K-K. Yap, M. Motiwala, J. Rahe, S. Padgett, M. Holliman, G. Baldus, M. Hines, T. Kim, A. Narayanan, A. Jain, V. Lin, C. Rice, B. Rogan, A. Singh, B. Tanaka, M. Verma, P. Sood, M. Tariq, M. Tierney, D. Trumic, V. Valancius, C. Ying, M. Kallahalla, B. Koley, and A. Vahdat. 2017. Taking the Edge off with Espresso: Scale, Reliability and Programmability for Global Internet Peering. In ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. C. Zakaria, A. Trivedi, M. Chee, P. Shenoy, and R. Balan. 2020. Analyzing the Impact of Covid-19 Control Policies on Campus Occupancy and Mobility via Passive WiFi Sensing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12050.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Lockdown Effect: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Internet Traffic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMC '20: Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference
      October 2020
      751 pages
      ISBN:9781450381383
      DOI:10.1145/3419394

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IMC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate53of216submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      IMC '24
      ACM Internet Measurement Conference
      November 4 - 6, 2024
      Madrid , AA , Spain

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader