skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3313092acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Eating Ads With a Monster: Introducing a Gamified Ad Blocker

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Often, online ads are annoying. Ad blockers are a way to prevent ads from appearing on a web page. As a result, web service providers lose more than 35 billion dollars per year and freely available content on the web is at risk. Taking both interests of web service providers and users into account, we present a gamified ad blocker that allows users to drag a virtual monster over ads to eat them and make them disappear. For each deactivated ad, users receive ad-free time that they can take whenever they want. We report findings from a pre-study, establishing requirements for the implementation of the ad blocker as well as the results of a usability test of our prototype. As a next step, we will release the extension in the Chrome Web Store for upcoming in-the-wild studies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw0167p.mp4

mp4

2.4 MB

References

  1. William Albert and E. Dixon. 2003. Is This What You Expected? The Use of Expectation Measures in Usability Testing. Proceedings of Usability Professionals Association 2003 Conference, Scottsdale, AZ. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Maximilian Altmeyer, Kathrin Dernbecher, Vladislav Hnatovskiy, Marc Schubhan, Pascal Lessel, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Gamified Ads: Bridging the Gap Between User Enjoyment and the Effectiveness of Online Ads. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019) (2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mimi An. 2016. Why People Block Ads and What It Means for Marketers and Advertisers. Hubspot Research (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3 (2009), 114--123. https://doi.org/66.39.39.113 arXiv:978-0--9846455702-0--1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jenny V. Bittner and Jeffrey Schipper. 2014. Motivational Effects and Age Differences of Gamification in Product Advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing 31, 5 (2014), 391--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. John Brooke. 1996. SUS - A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michelle R. Nelson. 2002. Recall of Brand Placements in Computer/Video Games. Journal of Advertising Research 42, 2 (2002), 80--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ralf Terlutter and Michael L. Capella. 2013. The Gamification of Advertising: Analysis and Research Directions of InGame Advertising, Advergames, and Advertising in Social Network Games. Journal of Advertising 42, 2--3 (2013), 95--112. arXiv:1111.6189v1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Moonhee Yang, David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, Lucian Dinu, and Laura M. Arpan. 2006. The Effectiveness of In-Game Advertising: Comparing College Students' Explicit and Implicit Memory for Brand Names. Journal of Advertising 35, 4 (2006), 143--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Eating Ads With a Monster: Introducing a Gamified Ad Blocker

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader