ABSTRACT
Finding a product online can be a challenging task for users. Faceted search interfaces, often in combination with recommenders, can support users in finding a product that fits their preferences. However, those preferences are not always equally weighted: some might be more important to a user than others (e.g. red is the favorite color, but blue is also fine) and sometimes preferences are even contradictory (e.g. the lowest price vs. the highest performance). Often, there is even no product that meets all preferences. In those cases, faceted search interfaces reach their limits. In our research, we investigate the potential of a search interface, which allows a preference-based ranking based on weighted search and facet terms. We performed a user study with 24 participants and measured user satisfaction and system performance. The results show that with the preference-based search interface the users were given more alternatives that best meet their preferences and that they are more satisfied with the selected product than with a search interface using standard facets. Furthermore, in this work we study the relationship between user satisfaction and search precision within the whole search session and found first indications that there might be a relation between them.
- Svetlin Bostandjiev, John O'Donovan, and Tobias Höllerer. 2012. TasteWeights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 35--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. D. Burke, K. J. Hammond, and B. C. Yound. 1997. The FindMe approach to assisted browsing. IEEE Expert 12, 4 (Jul 1997), 32--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claudio Carpineto and Giovanni Romano. 2012. A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval. ACM Comput. Surv. 44, 1 (Jan. 2012), 1:1--1:50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2012. Critiquing-based recommenders: survey and emerging trends. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1 (2012), 125--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William S Cleveland. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American statistical association 74, 368 (1979), 829--836.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shuguang Han, Danchen Zhang, Daqing He, and Qikai Cheng. 2016. User exploration of slider facets in interactive people search system. IConference 2016 Proceedings (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Maxwell Harper, Funing Xu, Harmanpreet Kaur, Kyle Condiff, Shuo Chang, and Loren Terveen. 2015. Putting Users in Control of Their Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marti Hearst, Ame Elliott, Jennifer English, Rashmi Sinha, Kirsten Swearingen, and Ka-Ping Yee. 2002. Finding the Flow in Web Site Search. Commun. ACM 45, 9 (Sept. 2002),42--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kalervo Järvelin and Jaana Kekäläinen. 2000. IR Evaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matt Lindner. 2016. "Online sales will reach $523 billion by 2020 in the U.S.". Online. (29 January 2016). Retrieved September 20, 2016 from https://www.internetretrailer.com/2016/02/29/online-sales-will-reach-523-billion-2020-us.Google Scholar
- Benedikt Loepp, Katja Herrmanny, and Jürgen Ziegler. 2015. Blended Recommending: Integrating Interactive Information Filtering and Algorithmic Recommender Techniques. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 975--984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David McSherry. 2003. Similarity and Compromise. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 291--305. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Christoph Trattner. 2014. See What You Want to See: Visual User-driven Approach for Hybrid Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 235--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hans peter Frei and Yonggang Qiu. 1993. Effectiveness of Weighted Searching in an Operational IR Environment. (1993).Google Scholar
- Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2005. Integrating Tradeoff Support in Product Search Tools for e-Commerce Sites. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pearl Huan Z. Pu and Pratyush Kumar. 2004. Evaluating Example-based Search Tools. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 208--217. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2011. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. J. Rocchio. 1971. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The Smart retrieval system - experiments in automatic document processing, G. Salton (Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 313--323.Google Scholar
- Nicolas Spyratos and Vassilis Christophides. 2006. Querying with Preferences in a Digital Library. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Federation over the Web. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 130--142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markus Stolze. 2000. Soft navigation in electronic product catalogs. International Journal on Digital Libraries 3, 1 (2000), 60--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Tunkelang. 2009. Faceted Search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 1, 1 (2009), 1--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Voigt, Artur Werstler, Jan Polowinski, and Klaus Meissner. 2012. Weighted Faceted Browsing for Characteristics-based Visualization Selection Through End Users. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bifan Wei, Jun Liu, Qinghua Zheng, Wei Zhang, Xiaoyu Fu, and Boqin Feng. 2013. A Survey of Faceted Search. J. Web Eng. 12, 1-2 (Feb. 2013), 41--64. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2481562.2481564 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ka-Ping Yee, Kirsten Swearingen, Kevin Li, and Marti Hearst. 2003. Faceted Metadata for Image Search and Browsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Re-ranking search results using query logs
CIKM '06: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementThis work addresses two common problems in search, frequently occurring with underspecified user queries: the top-ranked results for such queries may not contain documents relevant to the user's search intent, and fresh and relevant pages may not get ...
Evaluation of web search engine based on ranking of results and its features
Search engines help the user to surf the web. Due to the vast number of web pages, it is highly impossible for the user to retrieve the appropriate web page he needs. Thus, web search ranking algorithms play an important role in ranking web pages, so ...
Mobile Vertical Ranking based on Preference Graphs
ICTIR '17: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information RetrievalWe consider the problem of ranking relevant verticals for a given mobile search query so as to satisfy the average user. To this end, we utilise real mobile search click logs, and apply a graph contruction algorithm proposed by Agrawal et al. who ...
Comments