skip to main content
research-article

Unveiling Correlations via Mining Human-Thing Interactions in the Web of Things

Published:30 June 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With recent advances in radio-frequency identification (RFID), wireless sensor networks, and Web services, physical things are becoming an integral part of the emerging ubiquitous Web. Finding correlations among ubiquitous things is a crucial prerequisite for many important applications such as things search, discovery, classification, recommendation, and composition. This article presents DisCor-T, a novel graph-based approach for discovering underlying connections of things via mining the rich content embodied in the human-thing interactions in terms of user, temporal, and spatial information. We model this various information using two graphs, namely a spatio-temporal graph and a social graph. Then, random walk with restart (RWR) is applied to find proximities among things, and a relational graph of things (RGT) indicating implicit correlations of things is learned. The correlation analysis lays a solid foundation contributing to improved effectiveness in things management and analytics. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach, we develop a flexible feature-based classification framework on top of RGT and perform a systematic case study. Our evaluation exhibits the strength and feasibility of the proposed approach.

References

  1. Karl Aberer, Manfred Hauswirth, and Ali Salehi. 2006. A middleware for fast and flexible sensor network deployment. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 1199--1202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ralitsa Angelova and Gerhard Weikum. 2006. Graph-based text classification: Learn from your neighbors. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 485--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Luciano Baresi, Luca Mottola, and Schahram Dustdar. 2015. Building software for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 2 (2015), 6--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Payam Barnaghi, Amit Sheth, and Cory Henson. 2013. From data to actionable knowledge: Big data challenges in the Web of Things. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28, 6 (Nov 2013), 6--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2, 3 (2011), 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benoit Christophe, Vincent Verdot, and Vincent Toubiana. 2011a. Searching the Web of Things. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC). IEEE, 308--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Benoit Christophe, Vincent Verdot, and Vincent Toubiana. 2011b. Searching the Web of Things. In Proc. of ICSC. 308--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Alois Ferscha. 2012. 20 years past Weiser: What’s next? IEEE Pervasive Computing 11, 1 (2012), 52--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dominique Guinard, Vlad Trifa, Friedemann Mattern, and Erik Wilde. 2011. From the Internet of Things to the Web of Things: Resource-oriented architecture and best practices. In Architecting the Internet of Things. Springer, 97--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dionissios T. Hristopulos. 2003. Spartan Gibbs random field models for geostatistical applications. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 24, 6 (2003), 2125--2162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Jensen, J. Neville, and B. Gallagher. 2004. Why collective inference improves relational classification. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 593--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tatsuya Kameda, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, and Masanori Takezawa. 1997. Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 2 (1997), 296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tim Kindberg, John Barton, Jeff Morgan, Gene Becker, Debbie Caswell, Philippe Debaty, Gita Gopal, Marcos Frid, Venky Krishnan, Howard Morris, John Schettino, Bill Serra, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2002. People, places, things: Web presence for the real world. Mobile Networks and Applications 7, 5 (2002), 365--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xiangnan Kong, Philip S. Yu, Ying Ding, and David J. Wild. 2012. Meta path-based collective classification in heterogeneous information networks. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1567--1571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Danh Le-Phuoc, Hoan Nguyen Mau Quoc, Josiane Xavier Parreira, and Manfred Hauswirth. 2011. The linked sensor middleware--Connecting the real world and the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Semantic Web Challenge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Su-In Lee, Vassil Chatalbashev, David Vickrey, and Daphne Koller. 2007. Learning a meta-level prior for feature relevance from multiple related tasks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 489--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Elizabeth A. Leicht and Mark E. J. Newman. 2008. Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters 100, 11 (2008), 118703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yi Liu, Rong Jin, and Liu Yang. 2006. Semi-supervised multi-label learning by constrained non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’06). 421--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sujith S. Mathew, Yacine Atif, Quan Z. Sheng, and Zakaria Maamar. 2013. The web of things: Challenges and enabling technologies. In Internet of Things and Inter-cooperative Computational Technologies for Collective Intelligence, D. Varvaigou R. Hill M. Li N. Bessis, F. Xhafa (Ed.). Springer, 1--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Richard Mietz, Sven Groppe, Kay Römer, and Dennis Pfisterer. 2013. Semantic models for scalable search in the internet of things. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 2, 2 (2013), 172--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. K. T. Miller, T. L. Griffiths, and M. I. Jordan. 2009. Nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’09). 1276--1284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Suman Nath, Jie Liu, and Feng Zhao. 2007. Sensormap for wide-area sensor webs. IEEE Computer 40, 7 (2007), 90--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jennifer Neville and David Jensen. 2005. Leveraging relational autocorrelation with latent group models. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Multi-relational Mining. ACM, 49--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mark E. J. Newman. 2006. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74, 3 (2006), 036104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mark E. J. Newman and Michelle Girvan. 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69, 2 (2004), 026113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. L. M. Ni, Y. Liu, Y. C. Lau, and A. P. Patil. 2004. LANDMARC: Indoor location sensing using active RFID. Wireless Networks 10, 6 (2004), 701--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Siddika Parlak, Ivan Marsic, and Randall S. Burd. 2011. Activity recognition for emergency care using RFID. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks. 40--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing 8 Management 24, 5 (1988), 513--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Aviv Segev and Quan Z. Sheng. 2012. Bootstrapping ontologies for web services. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 5, 1 (2012), 33--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Quan Z. Sheng, Xue Li, and Sherali Zeadally. 2008. Enabling next-generation RFID applications: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Computer 41, 9 (2008), 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yizhou Sun, Jiawei Han, Charu C. Aggarwal, and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2012. When will it happen?: Relationship prediction in heterogeneous information networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 663--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Chiu C. Tan, Bo Sheng, Haodong Wang, and Qun Li. 2010. Microsearch: A search engine for embedded devices used in pervasive computing. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) 9, 4 (2010), 43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lei Tang and Huan Liu. 2009. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 817--826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hanghang Tong, Christos Faloutsos, and Jia-Yu Pan. 2006. Fast walk with restart and its applications. In Proceedings of the the 6th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Monica Vitali and Barbara Pernici. 2014. A survey on energy efficiency in information systems. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 23, 3 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Michail Vlachos, Christopher Meek, Zografoula Vagena, and Dimitrios Gunopulos. 2004. Identifying similarities, periodicities and bursts for online search queries. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 131--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Haodong Wang, Chiu Chiang Tan, and Qun Li. 2008. Snoogle: A search engine for the physical world. In Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’08). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Yanbo Wu, Quan Z. Sheng, Damith Ranasinghe, and Lina Yao. 2012. PeerTrack: A platform for tracking and tracing objects in large-scale traceability networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yanbo Wu, Quan Z. Sheng, Hong Shen, and Sherali Zeadally. 2013. Modeling object flows from distributed and federated RFID data streams for efficient tracking and tracing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 24, 10 (2013), 2036--2045. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jing Xia, Doina Caragea, and William Hsu. 2009. Bi-relational network analysis using a fast random walk with restart. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’09). IEEE, 1052--1057. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lina Yao and Quan Z. Sheng. 2012. Exploiting latent relevance for relational learning of ubiquitous things. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’12). 1547--1551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Lina Yao, Quan Z. Sheng, and Schahram Dustdar. 2015. Web-based management of the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 4 (July/August 2015), 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lina Yao, Quan Z. Sheng, Byron Gao, Anne H. H. Ngu, and Xue Li. 2013. A model for discovering correlations of ubiquitous things. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Lina Yao, Quan Z. Sheng, Anne H. H. Ngu, and Xue Li. 2016. Things of interest recommendation by leveraging heterogeneous relations in the Internet of Things. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 16, 2 (2016), 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Mao Ye, Dong Shou, Wang-Chien Lee, Peifeng Yin, and Krzysztof Janowicz. 2011. On the semantic annotation of places in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 520--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Yu Zhang and Dit Yan Yeung. 2011. Multi-task learning in heterogeneous feature spaces. In Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 23rd Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI-11/IAAI-1111), Code 87049, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Xiaojin Zhu, Zoubin Ghahramani, and John Lafferty. 2003. Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’03). 912--919. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Unveiling Correlations via Mining Human-Thing Interactions in the Web of Things

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Varadraj Prabhu Gurupur

        Today we find ourselves in a situation where there is an overabundance of data in information networks. This being the case, there is an overwhelming need to identify pieces of data that could be critical in decision making. Time and time again, graph theory has played a critical role in facilitating this decision making. Here, the semantics of data are considered pivotal when compared to the content. In this paper, the authors illustrate a unique method for identifying correlations between data elements contained on the Internet. The uniqueness of their approach lies in the fact that they use social and spatiotemporal graphs to perform the required analysis. The authors use a real-life situation to illustrate their technique, along with the associated algorithm and mathematics. The real-life situation considered here is that of various electronic items located in the kitchen and their usage. The items are tracked using radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based mobility detection. This is a very interesting research topic and the associated experiment is well illustrated. The application of this presented method may be multi-fold and can further the science described in the paper. Online Computing Reviews Service

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
          ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 8, Issue 5
          September 2017
          261 pages
          ISSN:2157-6904
          EISSN:2157-6912
          DOI:10.1145/3120923
          • Editor:
          • Yu Zheng
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 June 2017
          • Accepted: 1 December 2016
          • Revised: 1 September 2016
          • Received: 1 January 2016
          Published in tist Volume 8, Issue 5

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader