skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851878acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A multi-criteria ranking of security countermeasures

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a multi-criteria framework for ranking controlling strategies based on several weights, such as delay-time, resource cost, and success-probability of attacks defined via quantitative threat analysis. Therefore, by assigning a different priority to weight-dimensions, we can rank controllers in an adaptive way. We exemplify our approach on the Customer Energy Management System, that acting as an interface among different systems, is open to attacks. We consider the Man in the Middle and Denial of Service attacks.

References

  1. S. Bistarelli, U. Montanari, and F. Rossi. Semiring-based Constraint Solving and Optimization. JACM, 44(2):201--236, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Caravagna, G. Costa, and G. Pardini. Lazy security controllers. In STM, pages 33--48, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. V. Ciancia, F. Martinelli, I. Matteucci, and C. Morisset. Quantitative evaluation of enforcement strategies - position paper. In FPS, pages 178--186, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Drábik, F. Martinelli, and C. Morisset. Cost-aware runtime enforcement of security policies. In STM, pages 1--16, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Easwaran, S. Kannan, and I. Lee. Optimal control of software ensuring safety and functionality. Technical Report MS-CIS-05-20, University of Pennsylvania, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Elahi, E. Yu, and N. Zannone. Security risk management by qualitative vulnerability analysis. In Proceedings of METRISEC '11, pages 1--10. IEEE Computer Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Hägerling, F. M. Kurtz, C. Wietfeld, D. Iacono, A. Daidone, and F. Di Giandomenico. Security Risk Analysis and Evaluation of Integrating Customer Energy Management Systems into Smart Distribution Grids. In CIRED Workshop Proc., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. LeMay, M. D. Ford, K. Keefe, W. H. Sanders, and C. Muehrcke. Model-based Security Metrics Using ADversary VIew Security Evaluation (ADVISE). In Proc. of QEST, pages 191--200, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Mallios, L. Bauer, D. K. Kaynar, F. Martinelli, and C. Morisset. Probabilistic cost enforcement of security policies. In STM, pages 144--159, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Mont, R. Brown, S. Arnell, and N. Passingham. Security analytics: risk analysis for an organisation's incident management process. HP Lab., TR HPL-2012-206, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. NIST. Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity, February 12, 2014. http://goo.gl/X3Uvtj, (accessed Dec. 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Nostro, I. Matteucci, A. Ceccarelli, F. Di Giandomenico, F. Martinelli, and A. Bondavalli. On security countermeasures ranking through threat analysis. In SAFECOMP 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multi-criteria ranking of security countermeasures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        April 2016
        2360 pages
        ISBN:9781450337397
        DOI:10.1145/2851613

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader