skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702420acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing an effective and sustainable citizen science (CS)project requires consideration of a great number of factors. This makes the overall process unpredictable, even when a sound, user-centred design approach is followed by an experienced team of UX designers. Moreover, when such systems are deployed, the complexity of the resulting interactions challenges any attempt to generalisation from retrospective analysis. In this paper, we present a case study of the largest single platform of citizen driven data analysis projects to date, the Zooniverse. By eliciting, through structured reflection, experiences of core members of its design team, our grounded analysis yielded four sets of themes, focusing on Task Specificity, Community Development, Task Design and Public Relations and Engagement, supported by two-to-four specific design claims each. For each, we propose a set of design claims (DCs), drawing comparisons to the literature on crowdsourcing and online communities to contextualise our findings.

References

  1. Arguello, J., Butler, B., and Joyce, E. Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Proceedings of the ... (2006), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD, KDD '06, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bruckman, A., and Resnick, M. The mediamoo project constructionism and professional community. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 1, 1 (1995), 94--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C, B. Helping to get you started reflecting on your experiences, 3rd edition ed. Oxford Blackwell, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardamone, C., Schawinski, K., Sarzi, M., Bamford, S. P., Bennert, N., Urry, C., Lintott, C., Keel, W. C., Parejko, J., Nichol, R. C., et al. Galaxy zoo green peas: discovery of a class of compact extremely star-forming galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 399, 3 (2009), 1191--1205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cardamone, C. N. The story of the peas: Writing a scientific paper. http://blog.galaxyzoo.org/2009/07/02/the-storyof-the-peas-writing-a-scientific-paper, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, C. Zen in the art of citizen science: Apps for collective discovery and the 1 percent rule of the web. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guestblog/2013/09/11/zen-in-the-art-of-citizenscience-apps-for-collective-discovery-and-the1-rule-of-the-web/, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordero, P., Lucks, J. B., and Das, R. An rna mapping database for curating rna structure mapping experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 22 (2012), 3006--3008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dawson, R., and Bynghall, S. Getting Results from Crowds. Advanced Human Technologies, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Druschke, C. G., and Seltzer, C. E. Failures of engagement: Lessons learned from a citizen science pilot study. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 11, 3--4 (2012), 178--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., and Krcmar, H. Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management 39, 4 (2009), 342--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fortson, L., Masters, K., Nichol, R., Borne, K., Edmondson, E., Lintott, C., Raddick, J., Schawinski, K., and Wallin, J. Galaxy zoo: Morphological classification and citizen science. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.5513 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harper, F. M., Moy, D., and Konstan, J. A. Facts or friends?: Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social q&a sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 759--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hassman, K. D., Mugar, G., Østerlund, C., and Jackson, C. Learning at the seafloor, looking at the sky: The relationship between individual tasks and collaborative engagement in two citizen science projects. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinzelman, J., and Waters, C. Crowdsourcing crisis information in disaster-affected haiti. http://www.humanitarianforum.org/data/files/ crowdsourcinghaiti.pdf, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hilliard, C. Using structured reflection on a critical incident to develop a professional portfolio. Nursing standard 21, 2 (2006), 35--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. http://OpenScientist.org. Finalizing a definition of "citizen science" and "citizen scientists". http://www.openscientist.org/2011/09/ finalizing-definition-of-citizen.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kairam, S. R., Wang, D. J., and Leskovec, J. The life and death of online groups: Predicting group growth and longevity. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 673--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., and Veit, D. More than fun and money. worker motivation in crowdsourcing-a study on mechanical turk. In AMCIS (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawrykow, A., Roumanis, G., Kam, A., Kwak, D., Leung, C., Wu, C., Zarour, E., Sarmenta, L., Blanchette, M., Waldispühl, J., et al. Phylo: a citizen science approach for improving multiple sequence alignment. PloS one 7, 3 (2012), e31362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Khatib, F., Cooper, S., Tyka, M. D., Xu, K., Makedon, I., Popović, Z., Baker, D., and Players, F. Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 47 (2011), 18949--18953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kittur, A., and Kraut, R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: Quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '08, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 37--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological bulletin 119, 2 (1996), 254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kosmala, M. We need an 'i dont know' button! http://blog.snapshotserengeti.org/2012/12/14/ we-need-an-i-dont-know-button/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P., Kiesler, S., Burke, M., Chen, Y., Kittur, N., Konstan, J., Ren, Y., and Riedl, J. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Mit Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Krieger, M., and Stark, E. Coordinating tasks on the commons: designing for personal goals, expertise and serendipity. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (2009), 1485--1494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kuittinen, J., Kultima, A., Niemelä, J., and Paavilainen, J. Casual games discussion. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, Future Play '07, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kumar, R., Novak, J., and Tomkins, A. Structure and evolution of online social networks. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD '06 (2006), 611. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., and Ozkaya, E. Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2010), 1927--1936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Law, E., and von Ahn, L. Input-agreement: A new mechanism for collecting data using human computation games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1197--1206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lintott, C. J., et al. Galaxy zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 389, 3 (2008), 1179--1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Lintott, C. J., et al. Galaxy zoo:hanny's voorwerp, a quasar light echo?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 399, 1 (2009), 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., and Wiersma, Y. F. The iq of the crowd: Understanding and improving information quality in structured user-generated content. Information Systems Research 25, 4 (2014), 669--689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mazzolini, M., and Maddison, S. Sage, guide or ghost? the effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education 40, 3 (2003), 237--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., and Margaryan, A. Patterns of engagement in connectivist moocs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9, 2 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mugar, G., Osterlund, C., Hassman, K. D., Crowston, K., and Jackson, C. B. Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: Legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 109--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Murphy, E., and Coleman, E. Graduate students' experiences of challenges in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 30, 2 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things. Basic books, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Ockerman, J., and Pritchett, A. A review and reappraisal of task guidance: Aiding workers in procedure following. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 3 (2000), 191--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Oleson, D., Sorokin, A., Laughlin, G. P., Hester, V., Le, J., and Biewald, L. Programmatic gold: Targeted and scalable quality assurance in crowdsourcing. In Human Computation, vol. WS-11--11 of AAAI Workshops, AAAI (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Raddick, J., Lintott, C., Bamford, S., Land, K., Locksmith, D., Murray, P., Nichol, B., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Szalay, A., et al. Galaxy zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. In Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 40 (2008), 240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S., and Vandenberg, J. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9 (2010), 010103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., and Jacobs, D. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Schroer, J., and Hertel, G. Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychology 12, 1 (2009), 96--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Schwamb, M. E., Orosz, J. A., Carter, J. A., Welsh, W. F., Fischer, D. A., Torres, G., Howard, A. W., Crepp, J. R., Keel, W. C., Lintott, C. J., et al. Planet hunters: A transiting circumbinary planet in a quadruple star system. The Astrophysical Journal 768, 2 (2013), 127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Silvertown, J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in ecology & evolution 24, 9 (2009), 467--471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Szell, M., Lambiotte, R., and Thurner, S. Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 31 (2010), 13636--13641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Thaler, S., Simperl, E., Siorpaes, K., and Wlger, S. SpotTheLink: A Game-based Approach to the Alignment of Ontologies. IGI Global, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., and Shadbolt, N. Motivations of citizen scientists: A quantitative investigation of forum participation. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Vasilescu, B., Filkov, V., and Serebrenik, A. Stackoverflow and github: associations between software development and crowdsourced knowledge. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on, IEEE (2013), 188--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. von Ahn, L., and Dabbish, L. Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM 51, 8 (2008), 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Westphal, A. J., Butterworth, A. L., Snead, C. J., Craig, N., Anderson, D., Jones, S. M., Brownlee, D. E., Farnsworth, R., and Zolensky, M. E. Stardust@ home: a massively distributed public search for interstellar dust in the stardust interstellar dust collector. In 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, vol. 36 (2005), 1908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiggins, A., and Crowston, K. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on, IEEE (2011), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Zichermann, G., and Cunningham, C. Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps, 1st ed. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., and Gorman, S. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy 2, 2 (2010), 7--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader