skip to main content
10.1145/2663714.2668053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Facilitating Interactive Mining of Global and Local Association Rules

Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Association rule mining, a critical technology for decision making, faces two key challenges: (a.) performance: unacceptably high response times that are not capable of supporting interactive analysis, and (b.) usability: lack of support for sense-making of rule relationships. In this paper I describe two solutions proposed in my dissertation research that tackle these challenges. Our proposed COLARM system addresses the online mining of local association rules. Further, our proposed PARAS and FIRE systems provide solutions for interactive mining of global association rules. Overall, this research encompasses contributions at the intersection of data mining, knowledge management and visual analytics.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal, C. Procopiuc, and P. S. Yu. Finding localized associations in market basket data. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., pages 51--62, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. C. Aggarwal and P. S. Yu. A new approach to online generation of association rules. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 13(4):527--540, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In SIGMOD, pages 207--216, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In VLDB, pages 487--499, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Borgelt. Efficient implementations of apriori, eclat and fp-growth. http://www.borgelt.net, August 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Brin, R. Motwani, J. D. Ullman, and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In SIGMOD, pages 255--264, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Das, D. P, P. Deshpande, and R. Kannan. Fast rule mining over multi-dimensional windows. In SDM, pages 582--593, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, and O. Patashnik. Concrete Mathematics. Addison-Wesley, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Guo, M. O. Ward, and E. A. Rundensteiner. Nugget browser: Visual subgroup mining and statistical significance discovery in multivariate dataset. IV2011, pages 267--275, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1):10--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Han and Y. Fu. Discovery of multiple-level association rules from large databases. VLDB, pages 420--431, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Han, J. Pei, and Y. Yin. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. In SIGMOD, pages 1--12, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Hidber. Online association rule mining. ACM SIGMOD Rec., 28(2):145--156, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Kaya and R. Alhajj. Online mining of fuzzy multidimensional weighted association rules. Applied Intelligence, 29:13--34, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Kubat, A. Hafez, V. V. Raghavan, J. R. Lekkala, and W. K. Chen. Itemset trees for targeted association querying. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 15(6):1522--1534, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. X. Lin, A. Mukherji, E. A. Rundensteiner, C. Ruiz, and M. O. Ward. PARAS: A parameter space framework for online association mining. In PVLDB, volume 6 (3), pages 193--204, January 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, R. Perego, and F. Silvestri. Webdocs: a real-life huge transac. dataset. In FIMI, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Mukherji, X. Lin, C. R. Botaish, J. Whitehouse, E. A. Rundensteiner, M. O. Ward, and C. Ruiz. Paras: interactive parameter space exploration for association rule mining. In SIGMOD, pages 1017--1020, June 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Mukherji, X. Lin, J. Whitehouse, C. R. Botaish, E. A. Rundensteiner, and M. O. Ward. Fire: interactive visual support for parameter space-driven rule mining. In CIKM, pages 2447--2452, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Mukherji, E. A. Rundensteiner, and M. O. Ward. Colarm: Cost-based optimization for localized association rule mining. In EDBT, pages 181--192, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. B. Nag, P. M. Deshpande, and D. J. DeWitt. Using a knowledge cache for interactive discovery of association rules. In KDD, pages 244--253, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Ng, L. V. S. Lakshmanan, J. Han, and T. Mah. Exploratory mining via constrained frequent set queries. SIGMOD Rec., 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Sahar. Interestingness preprocessing. In ICDM, pages 489--496, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. E. H. Simpson. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 13:238--241, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining generalized association rules. In VLDB, pages 407--419, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining quantitative association rules in large relational tables. In SIGMOD, pages 1--12, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. UCI machine learning repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html, July 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. C.-Y. Wang, S.-S. Tseng, and T.-P. Hong. Flexible online association rule mining based on multidimensional pattern relations. Inf. Sci., pages 1752--1780, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. T. Wu, Y. Chen, and J. Han. Association mining in large databases: A re-examination of its measures. In PKDD, pages 621--628, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. J. Zaki and C.-J. Hsiao. Charm: An efficient algorithm for closed itemset mining. In SIAM SDM, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. M. J. Zaki, S. Parthasarathy, M. Ogihara, and W. Li. New algorithms for fast discovery of association rules. In SIGKDD, pages 283--286, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Facilitating Interactive Mining of Global and Local Association Rules

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PIKM '14: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Ph.D Students
      November 2014
      70 pages
      ISBN:9781450314817
      DOI:10.1145/2663714

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate4of10submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate25of62submissions,40%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader