skip to main content
editorial
Free Access

On the potential of recommendation technologies for efficient content delivery networks

Published:01 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

During the last decade, we have witnessed a substantial change in content delivery networks (CDNs) and user access paradigms. If previously, users consumed content from a central server through their personal computers, nowadays they can reach a wide variety of repositories from virtually everywhere using mobile devices. This results in a considerable time-, location-, and event-based volatility of content popularity. In such a context, it is imperative for CDNs to put in place adaptive content management strategies, thus, improving the quality of services provided to users and decreasing the costs. In this paper, we introduce predictive content distribution strategies inspired by methods developed in the Recommender Systems area. Specifically, we outline different content placement strategies based on the observed user consumption patterns, and advocate their applicability in the state of the art CDNs.

References

  1. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Burke, A. Felferning, and M. H. Goker, "Recommender systems: an overview," AI Magazine, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 13--18, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Pathan and R. Buyya, "A taxonomy and survey of content delivery networks," University of Melbourne, Technical Report GRIDS-TR-2007-4, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Huguenin, A.-M. Kermarrec, K. Kloudas, and F. Tïari, "Content and geographical locality in user-generated content sharing systems," in NOSSDAV, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Brodersen, S. Scellato, and M. Wattenhofer, "Youtube around the world: Geographic popularity of videos," in Proc. International Conference of World Wide Web (WWW), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Z. Li, J. Lin, M.-I. Akodjenou, G. Xie, M. A. Kaafar, Y. Jin, and G. Peng, "Watching videos from everywhere: a study of the PPTV mobile VoD system," in Proc. Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Maes, "Agents that reduce work and information overload," Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 30--40, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Berkovsky, "Decentralized mediation of user models for a better personalization," in Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, The Adaptive Web Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Lops, M. de Gemmis, and G. Semeraro, "Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends," in Recommender Systems Handbook, 2011, pp. 73--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Y. Koren and R. M. Bell, "Advances in collaborative filtering," in Recommender Systems Handbook, 2011, pp. 145--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. I. Schein, A. Popescul, L. H. Unger, and D. M. Pennock, "Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations," in Proc. SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Dimitrova, H.-J. Zhang, B. Shahraray, I. Sezan, T. Huang, and A. Zakhor, "Application of video-content analysis and retrieval," IEEE Multimedia, vol. 9, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Qiu, V. Padmanabhan, and G. Voelker, "On the placement of web server replicas," in IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Molina, C. E. Palau, and M. Esteve, "Modeling content delivery networks and their performance," Computer Communications, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 1401--1411, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Dowdy, L. Foster, "Comparative models of the file assignment problem," ACM Computer Surveys, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 28--313, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Karlsson, C. Karamanolis, and M. Mahalingam, "A framework for evaluating replica placement algorithms," HP Laboratories, Technical Report HPL-2002--219, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. F. Lo Presti, C. Petrioli, and C. Vicari, "Dynamic replica placement in content delivery networks," in Proc. International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Chen, R. Katz, and J. Kubiatowicz, "Dynamic replica placement for scalable content delivery," in Proc. International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the potential of recommendation technologies for efficient content delivery networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
        ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 43, Issue 3
        July 2013
        104 pages
        ISSN:0146-4833
        DOI:10.1145/2500098
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • editorial

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader