ABSTRACT
Writers of literary hypertext have urged complexly linked hypertext forms. Some writers have applied this to expository and argumentative hypertext, taking advantage of hypertext's ability to expand the "margins" of a document in new directions. Where argumentative issues or contexts are complex and self-reflexive enough, these writers urge that hypertexts become complex multi-dimensional expository and argumentative texts with elaborate rhetorical and argumentative structures that take place over sequences of links. However this ideal is challenged by developments on the Web, where argumentative hypertexts are dominated by a linked mini-essay style that uses one-step link patterns for its rhetorical moves. Was the ideal of complex hypertext rhetorical structures mistaken? This essay analyzes the situation, argues for the viability of more complex hypertexts, suggests some causes for the dominance of the single page and single-step rhetorical move, and looks at some developments that may challenge this dominance.
- Bernstein, Mark. 1998. Patterns of Hypertext. Proceedings of Hypertext 98, 21--29. DOI= http://www.eastgate.com/patterns/Patterns.html Google ScholarDigital Library
- Engelbart, Douglas. Bootstrap Institute. DOI= http://www.bootstrap.org/Google Scholar
- Crooked Timber. DOI= http://www.crookedtimber.orgGoogle Scholar
- Greco, D. Old Whinges. DOI= http://home.earthlink.net/~dianegreco/oldwhinges.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Guyer, Carol, and Martha Petry. 1991. Izme Pass. Writing on the Edge 2(2). Watertown: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
- Guyer, Carol. Woe. 1991. Writing on the Edge 2(2). Watertown: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
- Hollis, J. D. 2006. "Centers in Hypertext." November 7, 2006. DOI= http://buttondowndesign.comGoogle Scholar
- Joyce, M. 1990. afternoon, a story. Watertown: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. 1995. Socrates in the Labyrinth. Watertown: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. 2000. "Hypertext as Subversive." Culture Machine 2. DOI= http://culturemachine.tees.ac.uk/Cmach/Backissues/j002/Articles/art_kolb/Introduction_143.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Kolb, D. 2004. "Twin Media: Hypertext Structure Under Pressure," Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Hypertext Conference. DOI=http://www.dkolb.org/twin.media.ht04/covershe.html Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kolb, D. 2008. Sprawling Places. Book version: Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. Hypertext version: DOI= http://www.dkolb.org/sprawlingplacesGoogle Scholar
- Landow, G. The Victorian Web. DOI= http://www.victorianweb.orgGoogle Scholar
- Layer Tennis. DOI= http://layertennis.com/index.phpGoogle Scholar
- Leiter, Brian. Various Blogs. DOI= http://leiterreports.typepad.com/, http://www.leiterlegalphilosophy.typepad.com/, http://www.brianleiternietzsche.blogspot.com/Google Scholar
- Matias, J. Nathan. 2007. Tragedy in Electronic Literature. DODI= http://www.natematias.com/cam/trag-elit/Google Scholar
- McCardle, Megan. Blog. DOI=http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/Google Scholar
- Nelson, Ted. 1987. Computer Lib / Dream Machines. Redmond: Microsoft Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nelson, Ted. 2001. "Visionary Lays Into the Web." BBC, October 8, 2001. DOI= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1581891.stmGoogle Scholar
- Wikipedia, DOI= http://www.wikipedia.orgGoogle Scholar
- Yglesias, Matt. Blog. DOI= http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The revenge of the page
Recommendations
Three Senses of "Argument"
Computable Models of the LawIn AI approaches to argumentation, different senses of argument are often conflated. We propose a three-level distinction between arguments, cases, and debates. This allows us to modularise issues into separate levels and identify systematic relations ...
Hypertext with consequences: recovering a politics of hypertext
HYPERTEXT '96: Proceedings of the the seventh ACM conference on HypertextArguments in hypertext: a rhetorical approach
HYPERTEXT '00: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM on Hypertext and hypermedia
Comments