Abstract
Shakey the robot was a milestone of autonomous robots and artificial intelligence. Its design principles have dominated research until now. Tacit philosophical and architectural assumptions have impoverished the space of research topics and methods. I point out ways to overcome this impasse with sideglances to other scientific fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is also questionable whether such optimization of known technology is beneficial for industries. Brooks (https://rodneybrooks.com/the-end-of-moores-law/) criticizes the circuit industry for not thinking about new concepts of computer architectures.
References
Brooks R (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artif Intell 47:139–159
Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) (1988) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston
Gharajedaghi J (2011) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco
Gigerenzer G, Brighton H (2009) Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top Cogn Sci 1:107–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x
Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) The ABC Research Group (eds) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press
Haber A, Sammut C (2013) A cognitive architecture for autonomous robots. Adv Cogn Syst 2:257–275
Hayes-Roth B (1985) A blackboard architecture for control. Artif Intell 26(3):251–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(85)90063-3
Hayes-Roth B, Hayes-Roth F (1979) A cognitive model of planning. Cogn Sci 3(4):275–310
Katsikopoulos K (2019) Kirsch’s, and everyone’s, bind: how to build models for the wild? Cogn Process 20(2):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00914-1
Kelley D, Kelley T (2013) Creative confidence. Harpercollins, New York
Kirsch A (2017) Lessons from human problem solving for cognitive systems research. Adv Cogn Syst 5:13–24. http://www.cogsys.org/papers/ACSvol5/paper-5-4.pdf
Kirsch A (2017) A modular approach of decision-making in the context of robot navigation in domestic environments. In: Benzmüller C, Lisetti C, Theobald M (eds) 3rd global conference on artificial intelligence (GCAI), vol 50. EasyChair, Miami, FL, pp 134–147
Klein G (2002) The fiction of optimization. In: Gigerenzer G, Selten R (eds) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 103–122
Klein G (2017) Sources of power: how people make decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kotseruba I, Tsotsos JK (2016) A review of 40 years of cognitive architecture research: core cognitive abilities and practical applications. arXiv:1610.08602
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) METAPHORS we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Langley P (2017) Progress and challenges in research on cognitive architectures. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-17)
Lesser VR, Erman LD (1977) A retrospective view of the hearsay-II architecture. In: IJCAI’77: Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on artificial intelligence
Maes P (1990) Situated agents can have goals. Robot Auton Syst 6:49–70
Matarić M (1998) Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 2(3):82–87
Müller A, Wünsche HJ (2012) Object-related-navigation for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium. IEEE, Madrid
Nilsson NJ (1984) Shakey the robot. Tech. Rep. 323, AI Center, SRI International. http://www.ai.sri.com/shakey/
Scheutz M, Harris J, Schermerhorn P (2013) Systematic integration of cognitive and robotic architectures. Adv Cogn Syst 2:277–296
Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. In: McGuire C, Radner R (eds) Decision and organization. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Veloso M, Carbonell J, Pérez A, Borrajo D, Fink E, Blythe J (1995) Integrating planning and learning: the prodigy architecture. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 7(1):81–120
Yves Pigneur AO, Bernada G, Smith A (2014) Value proposition design. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirsch, A. Shakey Ever After? Questioning Tacit Assumptions in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. Künstl Intell 33, 423–428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00626-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00626-w