Skip to main content
Log in

Alleviating the effect of collinearity in geographically weighted regression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) is a popular technique to deal with spatially varying relationships between a response variable and predictors. Problems, however, have been pointed out (see Wheeler and Tiefelsdorf in J Geogr Syst 7(2):161–187, 2005), which appear to be related to locally poor designs, with severe impact on the estimation of coefficients. Different remedies have been proposed. We propose two regularization methods. The first one is generalized ridge regression, which can also be seen as an empirical Bayes method. We show that it can be implemented using ordinary GWR software with an appropriate choice of the weights. The second one augments the local sample as needed while running GWR. We illustrate both methods along with ordinary GWR on an example of housing prices in the city of Bilbao (Spain) and using simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this connection, we notice that the bi-square kernel has been replaced by a Gaussian kernel as the default option in the R function gwr of package spgwr (Bivand and Yu 2012) that we use in some of the computations below.

References

  • Bárcena M, Menéndez P, Palacios M, Tusell F (2011) Measuring the effect of the real estate bubble: a house price index for Bilbao. BILTOKI 2011.07, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), http://hdl.handle.net/10810/5463

  • Bárcena M, Menéndez P, Palacios M, Tusell F (2014) A real-time property value index based on web data. In: Zhao Y, Cen Y (eds) Data mining applications in R. Academic Press, New York, pp 273–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA (1991) Conditioning diagnostics. Collinearity and weak data in regression. Wiley, New York

  • Bitter C, Mulligan GF, Dall’erba S (2007) Incorporating spatial variation in housing attribute prices: a comparison of geographically weighted regression and the spatial expansion method. J Geogr Syst 9:7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Yu D (2012) spgwr: geographically weighted regression. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=spgwr, R package version 0.6-18

  • Farber S, Páez A (2007) A systematic investigation of cross-validation in GWR model estimation: empirical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. J Geogr Syst 9(4):371–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham S, Charlton M, Brunsdon C (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand AE, Kim HJ, Sirmans C, Banerjee S (2003) Spatial modeling with spatially varying coefficient processes. J Am Stat Assoc 98(462):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geniaux G, Napoléone C (2008) Semi-parametric tools for spatial hedonic models: an introduction to mixed geographically weighted regression and geoadditive models. In: Hedonic methods in housing markets. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–127

  • Griffith DA (2008) Spatial-filtering-based contributions to a critique of geographically weighted regression (GWR). Environ Plan A 40(11):2751–2769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for non-orthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge C, Hill RC, Griffiths WE, Lütkepohl H, Lee T (1988) Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Uchida T, Miyamoto K (2002) A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models: 1. Location-specific kernel bandwidths and a test for locational heterogeneity. Environ Plan A 34(4):733–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Long F, Farber S (2008) Moving window approaches for hedonic price estimation: an empirical comparison of modelling techniques. Urban Stud 45:1565–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Farber S, Wheeler DC (2011) A simulation-based study of geographically weighted regression as a method for investigating spatially varying relationships. Environ Plan A 43(12):2992–3010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntanen S, Styan GP, Isotalo J (2011) Matrix tricks for linear statistical models. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins H (1956) Proceedings of the third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1: contributions to the theory of statistics. University of California Press, chap An Empirical Bayes approach to Statistics

  • Seber GAF, Lee AJ (1998) Linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey SD (1969) Multicollinearity and imprecise estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 31:539–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey SD (1980) Optimal design. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58:267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidaurre D, Bielza C, Larrañaga P (2012) Lazy LASSO for local regression. Comput Stat 27:531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D (2010) Visualizing and diagnosing coefficients from geographically weighted regression models. In: Jiang B, Yao X (eds) Geospatial analysis and modelling of urban structure and dynamics, GeoJournal library, vol 99. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 415–436

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D (2011) gwrr: Geographically weighted regression with penalties and diagnostic tools. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gwrr, R package version 0.1-1

  • Wheeler D, Calder C (2007) An assessment of coefficient accuracy in linear regression models with spatially varying coefficients. J Geogr Syst 9(2):145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D, Tiefelsdorf M (2005) Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. J Geogr Syst 7(2):161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DC (2007) Diagnostic tools and a remedial method for collinearity in geographically weighted regression. Environ Plan A 39(10):2464–2481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DC (2009) Simultaneous coefficient penalization and model selection in geographically weighted regression: the geographically weighted LASSO. Environ Plan A 41(3):722–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DC, Waller L (2008) Comparing spatially varying coefficient models: a case study examining violent crime rates and their relationships to alcohol outlets and illegal drug arrests. J Geogr Syst 11(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DC, Páez A, Spinney J, Waller L (2013) A Bayesian approach to hedonic price analysis. In: Papers in regional science (to appear), pp 1–22

Download references

Acknowledgments

The comments of the editor of the journal and three referees have substantially improved the original manuscript and are gratefully acknowledged. Partial support from grants ECO2008-05622 (MCyT) and IT-347-10 (Basque Government) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Tusell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bárcena, M.J., Menéndez, P., Palacios, M.B. et al. Alleviating the effect of collinearity in geographically weighted regression. J Geogr Syst 16, 441–466 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-014-0199-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-014-0199-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation