Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rule induction can achieve orders of magnitude reduction in the volume of data descriptions. For example, we applied a commercial tool (IXLtm) to a 1,819 record tropical storm database, yielding 161 rules. However, human comprehension of the discovered results may require further reduction. We present a rule refinement strategy, partly implemented in a Prolog program, that operationalizes “interestingness” into performance, simplicity, novelty, and significance. Applying the strategy to the induced rulebase yielded 10 “genuinely interesting” rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.) (1972).Handbook of Mathematical Functions, U. S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buntine, W. (1988). “Generalized Subsumption and Its Applications to Induction and Redundancy”,Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36, pp. 149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cry, G. W. (1965).Tropical Cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, Technical Paper No. 55, U. S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R., and Hart, P. E. (1973).Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, G. E., and Miller, B. I. (1964).Atlantic Hurricanes, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, W., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Matheus, C. J. (1991) “Knowledge Discovery in Databases: an Overview”, In Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Frawley, W. (Eds.),Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. G. (1984). “Natural Hazard Risk Assessment for an Insurance Program”,The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Vol. 9, pp. 57–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. G. (1990). “Is Hugo a Forerunner of Future Great Hurricanes?”Research Review: Journal of the Society of Insurance Research, July.

  • Gaines, B. R. (1991a). “Refining Induction into Knowledge”, InProceedings of the 1991 AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI, Anaheim, CA, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B. R. (1991b). “The Trade-off Between Knowledge and Data in Knowledge Acquisition”, In Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Frawley, W. (Eds.),Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, F. (1991). “Choosing Among Competing Generalizations,”Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 3, pp. 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A., Weiss, S. M., and Politakis, P. (1988). “Automatic Knowledge Base Refinement For Classification Systems”,Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35, pp. 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinstein, G., et al. (1992). “Visualization For Knowledge Discovery”,International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, H. L. (1980). “Early History of Multiple Comparison Tests,” In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Ed.),Handbook of Statistics. North-Holland, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, J., and Neumann, C. J. (1970). “An Operational Technique for Relating the Movement of Existing Tropical Cyclones to Past Tracks”,Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 98, pp. 925–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • IntelligenceWare, (1990).IXL: The Machine Learning System User's Manual.

  • Jarvinen, B. R., Neumann, C. J., and Davis, M. A. S. (1984).A Tropical Cyclone Data Tape for the North Atlantic Basin, Technical Memorandum NWS NHC 22, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Weather Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, D. (1991). “Knowledge Discovery Through Induction With Randomization Testing,” InProceedings of the 1991 AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Anaheim, CA, pp. 148–159.

  • Klosgen, W. (1992). “Problems For Knowledge Discovery in Databases and Their Treatment in the Statistics Explorer Explora”,International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 649–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. B. (1983). “The Role of Heuristics in Learning by Discovery: Three Case Studies”, In Michalski, R., Carbonell, J., and Mitchell, T. (Eds.),Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, J. A., and Riedinger, D. R. (1992). “EFD: A Hybrid Knowledge/ Statistical-Based System for the Detection of Fraud”,International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 687–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S., and Stepp, R. E. (1983) “Learning from Observation: Conceptual Clustering”, In Michalski, R., Carbonell, J., and Mitchell, T. (Eds.),Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S. (1983) “A Theory and Methodology of Inductive Learning”, In Michalski, R., Carbonell, J., and Mitchell, T. (Eds.),Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moninger, W. R., et al. (1991). “Shootout-89, a Comparative Evaluation of Knowledge-Based Systems that Forecast Severe Weather”,Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 72, pp. 1339–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsaye, K., et al. (1989).Intelligent Databases: Object-Oriented, Deductive, Hypermedia Technologies, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1988).Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. (1991) “Discovery, Analysis and Presentation of Strong Rules”, In Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Frawley, W. (Eds.),Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Matheus, C. J. (1992). “Knowledge Discovery Workbench for Exploring Business Databases”,International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 675–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pregibon, D. (1991) “A Statistician's View of Knowledge Discovery in Data (KDD)-What are Important Long Term Directions?”, In “Panel Positions on ‘Hilbert’ Problems in KDD,” addendum toProceedings of the 1991 AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI, Anaheim, CA, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Property Claim Services (1993),Catastrophe Bulletin, February 24, American Insurance Services Group, Rahway, NJ.

  • Quinlan, J. R. (1987). “Generating Production Rules From Decision Trees”, InProceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 304–307.

  • Shen, W. M. (1992). “Discovering Regularities From Knowledge Bases”,International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 623–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. M., Galen, R. S., and Tadepalli, P. V. (1990) “Maximizing the Predictive Value of Production Rules”,Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 45, pp. 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P. H. (1975). “Learning Structural Descriptions From Examples”, In P. H. Winston (Ed.),The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Major, J.A., Mangano, J.J. Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database. J Intell Inf Syst 4, 39–52 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962821

Keywords

Navigation