Abstract
The reasoning of judgment documents is the touchstone of justice. Attaching importance to the reasoning of judgment documents is essentially the embodiment of judiciary civilization. In order to promote the reform of judgment documents reasoning and improve the level of it, the technology of automated judgment documents reasoning evaluation has to be studied on. How to build evidence chain relational model is the basis and key to this technology. An approach is proposed to build evidence chain relational model based on Chinese judgment documents. Using automated text preprocessing for Chinese judgment documents creates semi-structured XML documents and extracts evidence set and fact set. The method of key elements extraction is used to obtain the keywords of evidence and facts. Calculating the degree of association can work out the connection points of evidence chain relational model. Tabular display and graphical display of evidence chain relational model can be realized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hou, X.: On holistic concept of judgment document reasoning. J. Party Sch. Guiyang Comm. C.P.C 1, 52–55 (2009)
Hu, Y.: On reason giving of judgements. J. Law Appl. 3, 48–52 (2009)
Zhou, G.: Fact of case, law of case, emotion of document and style of writing––the way of judgment document reasoning. J. Shandong Judges Train. Inst. (Shandong Judgem.) 23(5), 41–46 (2007)
Wang, Z.: On reasoning in judgement documents. J. Law Appl. 12, 3–7 (2000)
Buchanan, B.G., Headrick, T.E.: Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanf. Law Rev. 23(1), 40–62 (1970)
Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 32–41. ACM (2003)
Bex, F.J., Prakken, H., Verheij, B.: Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 1–10. ACM (2007)
Williams, M.A.: Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 216–217. ACM (2009)
Keppens, J.: On extracting arguments from Bayesian network representations of evidential reasoning (2011)
Bentham, J.: Rationale of judicial evidence (1827)
Chen, W.: The study on the evidence chain. J. National Prosec. Coll. 15(4), 128–136 (2007)
Ma, G., Wang, Z., Wang, K.: On electronic judicial identification model based on evidence chain. J. Hebei Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 33(3), 317–323 (2013)
Jia, Z., Bai, J.: Computer forensics and formation of evidence chain. Autom. Instrum. 8, 124–126 (2014)
Wang, W., Zhao, D., Zou, L., et al.: Extracting 5W1H event semantic elements from Chinese online news. In: DBLP Proceedings of the Web-Age Information Management, International Conference, WAIM 2010, Jiuzhaigou, China, 15–17 July 2010, pp. 644–655 (2010)
Wang, W.: Chinese news event 5W1H semantic elements extraction for event ontology population, pp. 197–202 (2012)
Cai, Z.: Standard of evidence chain integrity and approach to examine. Lawyer World 3, 11–13 (2003)
Chen J.: On fact-finding in the court and evidence. Southwest University of Political Science and Law (2009)
Shi, D.: Chinese attributive V-N compounds. Chin. Lang. 6, 483–495 (2003)
Li, R., Wang, Z., Li, S., et al.: Chinese sentence similarity computing based on frame semantic parsing. J. Comput. Res. Dev. 50(8), 1728–1736 (2013)
Bex, F.J., Koppen, P.J.V., Prakken, H., et al.: A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artif. Intell. Law 18(2), 123–152 (2010)
Keppens, J., Shen, Q., Price, C.: Compositional Bayesian modelling for computation of evidence collection strategies. Appl. Intell. 35(1), 134–161 (2011)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Key Program of Research and Development of China (2016YFC0800803).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kong, S. et al. (2017). Build Evidence Chain Relational Model Based on Chinese Judgment Documents. In: Zou, B., Han, Q., Sun, G., Jing, W., Peng, X., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 728. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6388-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6388-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6387-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6388-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)