Abstract
Otto Neurath (1882–1945) might never have been the pet philosopher of the logical empiricists’ influential movement. For instance, he appears never to have assumed any distinctively genial and agreeable position in the mainstreams of the movement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hartmann, F., Bauer, E. K. (2006). Bildersprache: Otto Neurath, Visualisierungen. Wien: Facultas. wuv Universitäts.
Hintikka, J. (1992). Carnap’s work in the foundations of logic and mathematics in a historical perspective, Synthese 93, 167–189. Reprinted in Hintikka (1997, 191–213).
Hintikka, J. (1997). Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kamp, H., Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lee, C. (2008). Semantics and Cognitive Science, manuscript.
Lupton, E. (1986). Reading isotype, Design Issues 3, 47–58.
Nemeth, E., Stadler, F. (eds.) (1996). Encyclopedia and Utopia: The life and work of Otto Neurath (1882–1945). Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Neurath, O. (1921). Anti-Spengler. München: Georg D. W. Callwey (Abridged translation appears in Neurath 1973).
Neurath, O. (1936). International Picture Language: The First Rules of ISOTYPE. London: Kegan Paul. Reprinted, with a German translation by Marie Neurath, by University of Reading Department of Typography & Graphic Communication, 1980.
Neurath, O. (1937). Basic by Isotype. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Neurath, O. (1944). Foundations of the Social Sciences, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. II, No. 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Charles Morris (eds.). Foundations of the Unity of Science: Toward an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume II, 1–52, University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, O. (1973). M., Cohen, R. S. (eds), In Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Neurath, M., Kinross, R. (2008). The Transformer: Principles of Making Isotype Charts. London: Hyphen Press.
Nyíri, K. (2003). From texts to pictures: The new unity of science. In Nyíri, K. (ed), Mobile Learning: Essays on Philosophy, Psychology and Education, 45–79. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Odum, H. T. (1994). Ecological and General Systems: An Introduction to Systems Ecology. Boulder, CO: Colorado University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). C., Weiss, P., Burks, A. W. (eds), In Hartshorne, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2006). Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2007). The semantics/pragmatics distinction from the game-theoretic point of view. In Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.), Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, pp. 229–242. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2008a). Diagrammatic logic of existential graphs: A case study of commands. In Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5223, 404–407. Heidelberg: Springer.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2008b). An iconic Logic of Metaphors, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Cognitive Science, Yonsei University: The Korean Society for Cognitive Science, 317–320.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2010a). Peirce and the logic of image, Semiotica in press.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2010b). Is non-visual diagrammatic logic possible? How? In Gerner, A. (ed), Diagrammatology and Diagram Praxis. London: College Publications. in press.
Sandu, G., Hintikka, J. (2001). Aspects of compositionality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 49–61.
Smith, J. M., Szathmáry, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Twyman, M. (1975). Graphic Communication Through ISOTYPE. University of Reading: Department of Typography & Graphic Communication.
van Heijernoort, J. (1967). Logic and calculus and logic as language, Synthese 17, 324–330.
von Engelhardt, J. (2002). The Language of Graphics: A Framework for the Analysis of Syntax and Meaning in Maps, Charts and Diagrams, ILLC Dissertations. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Vossoughian, N. (2008). Otto Neurath: The Language of the Global Polis. Den Haag: NAi Publishers.
Acknowledgments
Supported by the University of Helsinki Excellence in Research Grant (2006–2008) and the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pietarinen, AV. (2011). Principles and Practices of Neurath’s Picture Language. In: Symons, J., Pombo, O., Torres, J. (eds) Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0142-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0143-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)