Skip to main content

Underwater Archaeological 3D Surveys Validation within the Removed Sets Framework

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6717))

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the VENUS european project aimed at providing scientific methodologies and technological tools for the virtual exploration of deep water archaeological sites. We focused on underwater archaeological 3D surveys validation problem. This paper shows how the validation problem has been tackled within the Removed Sets framework, according to Removed Sets Fusion (RSF) and to the Partially Preordered Removed Sets Inconsistency Handling (PPRSIH). Both approaches have been implemented thanks to ASP and the good behaviour of the Removed Sets operations is presented through an experimental study on two underwater archaeological sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Combining knowledge bases consisting of first order theories. In: Proc. of ISMIS, pp. 92–101 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Ben-Naim, J., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: An answer set programming encoding of prioritized removed sets revision: application to gis. Applied Intelligence 32(1), 60–87 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Lagrue, S., Papini, O.: Revision of partially ordered information: Axiomatization, semantics and iteration. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2005, Edinburgh, pp. 376–381 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewka, G.: Preferred sutheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1989, pp. 1043–1048 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drap, P., Grussenmeyer, P.: A digital photogrammetric workstation on the web. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 55(1), 48–58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. Artificial Intelligence 172(12-13), 1495–1539 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Neumann, A., Schaub, T.: clasp: A conflict-driven answer set solver. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4483, pp. 260–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hue, J., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: Implementing prioritized merging with ASP. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. CCIS, vol. 80, pp. 138–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hué, J., Würbel, E., Papini, O.: Removed sets fusion: Performing off the shelf. In: Proc. of ECAI 2008, pp. 94–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lefèvre, C., Nicolas, P.: A first order forward chaining approach for answer set computing. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5753, pp. 196–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Papini, O.: A complete revision function in propositionnal calculus. In: Neumann, B. (ed.) Proc. of ECAI 1992, pp. 339–343. John Wiley and Sons. Ltd., Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papini, O.: D3.1 archaeological activities and knowledge analysis. Technical report, Delivrable, VENUS project. january (2007), http://www.venus-project.eu

  13. Papini, O., Curé, O., Drap, P., Fertil, B., Hué, J., Roussel, D., Sérayet, M., Seinturier, J., Würbel, E.: D3.6 reasoning with archaeological ontologies. technical report and prototype of software for the reversible fusion operations. Technical report, Delivrable, VENUS project (July 2009), http://www.venusproject.eu

  14. Papini, O., Würbel, E., Jeansoulin, R., Curé, O., Drap, P., Sérayet, M., Hué, J., Seinturier, J., Long, L.: D3.4 representation of archaeological ontologies 1. Technical report, Delivrable, VENUS project (July 2008), http://www.venus-project.eu

  15. Rescher, N., Manor, R.: On inference from inconsistent premises. Theory and Decision 1, 179–219 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Seinturier, J.: Fusion de connaissances: Applications aux relevés photogrammétriques de fouilles archéologiques sous-marines. PhD thesis, Université du Sud Toulon Var (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sérayet, M., Drap, P., Papini, O.: Extending removed sets revision to partially preordered belief bases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52(1), 110–126 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Würbel, E., Papini, O., Jeansoulin, R.: Revision: an application in the framework of gis. In: Proc. of KR 2000, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, pp. 505–516 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yahi, S., Benferhat, S., Lagrue, S., Sérayet, M., Papini, O.: A lexicographic inference for partially preordered belief bases. In: Proc. of KR 2008, pp. 507–516 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hué, J., Sérayet, M., Drap, P., Papini, O., Würbel, E. (2011). Underwater Archaeological 3D Surveys Validation within the Removed Sets Framework. In: Liu, W. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6717. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22151-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22152-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics