Skip to main content

Taking Up the Challenge of Evaluating Research Results in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning

  • Conference paper
  • 2449 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5736))

Abstract

The present contribution tackles the issue of the evaluation of research results in the field of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). It presents an evaluation model designed to evaluate a web based Pedagogical Planner and the theoretical model underpinning it. The evaluation model, designed and tested within a European project, proved to be able to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the TEL system at hand, by distinguishing between theory and practice, between the advantages and disadvantages derived from the theoretical model and/or those referable to the implemented tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Latchem, C. (ed.): A content analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(4), 503–511 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs, G.: Evaluating courseware: Some critical questions. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, 3–8 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crowther, M.S., Keller, C.C., Waddoups Gregory, L.: Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(3), 289–303 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bligh, B.: Towards a compendium of learning space evaluations, http://www.lsri.nottingham.ac.uk/JELS/JELS_newsletter1_Dec08.pdf (accessed December 08, 2008)

  5. Alexandropoulou, D.A., Angelis, V.A., Mavri, M.: Knowledge management and higher education: present state and future trends. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 5(1), 96–106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, S., Brock, D.M., Orkand, A., Astion, M.L.: Design implications from a usability study of GramStain-TutorTM. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(5), 595–605 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hlapanis, G., Dimitrakopoulou, A.: A course model implemented in a teacher’s learning community context: issues of course assessment. Behaviour & Information Technology 26(6), 561–578 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Supporting the Design of Pilot Learning Activities with the Pedagogical Plan Manager. In: Learning to live in the knowledge society. IFIP – International Federation for Information Processing - Book Series, pp. 37–44. Springer, Boston (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Artigue, M.: Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in Mathematics education. In: Pitta-Pantazi, D., Philippou, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME, vol. 5, pp. 68–82 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bottino, R.M., Artigue, M., Noss, R.: Building European Collaboration in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Mathematics. In: Balacheff, N., et al. (eds.) Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 73–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Pedagogical Plans as Communication Oriented objects. Poster presented at Cal 2009 Conference, Brighton, March 23-24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 112–133 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D., Warshaw, P.R.: Development and test of a theory of technology learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7), 660–686 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sammour, G., Schreurs, J., Al-Zoubi, A.Y., Vanhoof, K.: The role of knowledge management and e-learning in professional development. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4(5), 465–477 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bottino, R.M., Ott, M., Pozzi, F. (2009). Taking Up the Challenge of Evaluating Research Results in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. Visioning and Engineering the Knowledge Society. A Web Science Perspective. WSKS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5736. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04754-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04754-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04753-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04754-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics