Abstract
Increasing usage of computer simulation as a method of pursuing science makes methodological reflection immanently important. After discussing relevant philosophical positions Winsberg’s view of simulation modeling is adapted to conceptualize simulation modeling as an abductive way of doing science. It is proposed that two main presuppositions determine the outcome of a simulation: theory and methodology. The main focus of the paper is on the analysis of the role of simulation methodologies in simulation modeling. The fallacy of applying an inadequate simulation methodology to a given simulation task is dubbed ‘abductive fallacy’. In order to facilitate a superior choice of simulation methodology three respects are proposed to compare System Dynamics and Agent-based Modeling: structure, behavior and emergence. These respects are analyzed on the level of the methodology itself and verified in case studies of the WORLD3-model and the Sugarscape model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brassel, K., Möhring, M., Schumacher, E., Troitzsch, K.: Can agents cover all the world? In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating social phenomena, pp. 55–72. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Casti, J.: Would-Be Worlds: How simulation is changing the frontiers of science. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997)
Corning, P.: The re-emergence of ‘emergence: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6), 18–30 (2002)
Epstein, J., Axtell, R.: Growing artificial societies. MIT Press, Washington (1996)
Giere, R.: How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of science 71, 742–752 (2004)
Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)
Grebel, T., Pyka, A.: Agent-based modelling – A methodology for the analysis of qualitative development processes, 2004. In: Lombardi, M., Squazzoni, F. (eds.) Saggi di economia evolutiva, FrancoAngeli, Milano (2005)
Lorenz, T., Bassi, A.: Comprehensibility as a discrimination criterion for Agent-Based Modelling and System Dynamics: An empirical approach. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston (2005), http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2005/proceed/papers/BASSI175.pdf
Lorenz, T., Jost, A.: Towards an orientation-framework for multiparadigm modeling. In: Größler, et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th international conference of the System Dynamics Society, Nijmegen (2006), http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2006/proceed/papers/LOREN178.pdf
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens, W.: The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York (1972)
Meadows, D., Robinson, J.: The electronic oracle. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1985)
Morgan, M.: Experiments without Material Intervention. In: Raader, H. (ed.) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, pp. 216–235. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (2003)
Morrison, M., Morgan, M.: Models as mediating instruments. In: Morgan, M., Morrison, M. (eds.) Models as mediators, pp. 10–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Morrison, M.: Models as autonomous agents. In: Morgan, M., Morrison, M. (eds.) Models as mediators, pp. 38–65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Towards good social science. JASS 8(4) (2005)
Oreskes, N.: Why believe a computer? In: Schneiderman, J. (ed.) The earth around us: Maintaining a livable planet, pp. 70–82. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco (2000)
Parunak, H., Savit, R., Riolo, R.: Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Modeling Agent Based Systems, pp. 10–25 (1998)
Phelan, S.: A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12(3), 237–246 (1999)
Sawyer, R.: Simulating emergence and downward causation in small groups. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1979, pp. 49–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Schieritz, N., Milling, P.: Modeling the Forest or Modeling the Trees. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (2003)
Sterman, J.: Business Dynamics. Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)
Winsberg, E.: Sanctioning Models: The epistemology of simulation. Science in context 12(2), 275–292 (1999)
Winsberg, E.: The hierarchy of models in simulation. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N., Thagard, P. (eds.) Model-based reasoning in Scientific discovery. Springer, New York (1999)
Winsberg, E.: Simulated experiments: methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of science 70, 105–125 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lorenz, T. (2009). Abductive Fallacies with Agent-Based Modeling and System Dynamics. In: Squazzoni, F. (eds) Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences. EPOS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5466. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01109-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01109-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01108-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01109-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)