Skip to main content

Actions with Failures in Interval Temporal Logic

  • Conference paper
Book cover Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5056))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

Failures are unavoidable in many circumstances. For example, an agent may fail at some point to perform a task in a dynamic environment. Robust systems typically have mechanisms to handle such failures. Temporal logic is a widely used representation language for reasoning about the behaviour of systems, although dealing with failures is not part of the language. In this paper, it is investigated how interval temporal logic can be extended with an operator describing failure. This logic has a close relationship to exception handling mechanisms in programming languages, which provides an elegant mechanism for modelling and handling failures. The approach is motivated from the context of specification of systems that have to operate in highly dynamic environments. A case study of the formal modelling and verification of the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 illustrates the practical usefulness of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alves-Foss, J., Lam, F.S.: Dynamic denotational semantics of Java. In: Alves-Foss, J. (ed.) Formal Syntax and Semantics of Java. LNCS, vol. 1523. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Balser, M.: Verifying Concurrent Systems with Symbolic Execution – Temporal Reasoning is Symbolic Execution with a Little Induction. PhD thesis, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cau, A., Moszkowski, B.: Using PVS for interval temporal logic proofs. part 1: The syntactic and semantic encoding. Technical report, SERCentre, De Montfort University, Leicester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giunchiglia, F., Spalazzi, L., Traverso, P.: Planning with failure. Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, 74–79 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hindriks, K., de Boer, F., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Failure, monitoring and recovery in the agent language 3APL. In: De Giacomo, G. (ed.) AAAI 1998 Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics, pp. 68–75 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hommersom, A.J., Groot, P.C., Lucas, P.J.F., Balser, M., Schmitt, J.: Verification of medical guidelines using background knowledge in task networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(6), 832–846 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Konikowska, B.: A three-valued linear temporal logic for reasoning about concurrency. Technical report, ICS PAS, Warsaw (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moszkowski, B.: A temporal logic for multilevel reasoning about hardware. IEEE Computer 18(2), 10–19 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moszkowski, B.: The programming language Tempura. Journal of Symbolic Computation 22(5/6), 730–733 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. von Oheimb, D., Nipkow, T.: Machine-checking the Java specification: Proving type-safety. In: Alves-Foss, J. (ed.) Formal Syntax and Semantics of Java. LNCS, vol. 1523. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of KR 1991, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rutten, G.E.H.M., Verhoeven, S., Heine, R.J., de Grauw, W.J.C., Cromme, P.V.M., Reenders, K.: NHG-standaard diabetes mellitus type 2 (eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet 42, 67–84 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shahar, Y., Miksch, S., Johnson, P.: The Asgaard project: A task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-orientied clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14, 29–51 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tucker, A.B., Noonan, R.E.: Programming Languages – Principles and Paradigms, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turner, R.: Logics for Artificial Intelligence. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hommersom, A., Lucas, P. (2008). Actions with Failures in Interval Temporal Logic. In: Sadri, F., Satoh, K. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5056. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88832-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88833-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics