Skip to main content

Distributed Norm Enforcement Via Ostracism

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4870))

Abstract

An agent normative society has to deal with two main concerns: how to define norms and how to enforce them. Enforcement becomes a complex issue as agent societies become more decentralized and open. We propose a new distributed mechanism to enforce norms by ostracizing agents that do not abide by them. Our simulations have shown that, although complete ostracism is not always possible, the mechanism substantially reduces the number of norm violations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: An evolutionary approach to norms. The American Political Science Review 80, 1095–1111 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Enforceable social laws. In: AAMAS 2005: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 682–689 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter, J., Matthews, P., Ong’ong’a, O.: Why punish: Social reciprocity and the enforcement of prosocial norms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(4), 407–429 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R., Paoluccci, M.: Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(3) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delgado, J.: Emergence of social conventions in complex networks. Artificial Intelligence 141(1), 171–185 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Grizard, A., Vercouter, L., Stratulat, T., Muller, G.: A peer-to-peer normative system to achieve social order. In: AAMAS 2006 Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in agent systems (COIN) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hales, D.: Group reputation supports beneficent norms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heckathorn, D.D.: Collective sanctions and compliance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control. American Sociological Review 55(3), 366–384 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kittock, J.E.: The impact of locality and authority on emergent conventions: Initial observations. In: AAAI 1994. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 420–425. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pujol, J.M., Delgado, J., Sangüesa, R., Flache, A.: The role of clustering on the emergence of efficient social conventions. In: IJCAI 2005: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 965–970 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, M.: Community, Anarchy & Liberty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, A., Wooldridge, M.: Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In: Lesser, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, San Francisco, pp. 384–389. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (393), 440–442 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Younger, S.: Reciprocity, sanctions, and the development of mutual obligation in egalitarian societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8(2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jaime Simão Sichman Julian Padget Sascha Ossowski Pablo Noriega

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Perreau de Pinninck, A., Sierra, C., Schorlemmer, M. (2008). Distributed Norm Enforcement Via Ostracism. In: Sichman, J.S., Padget, J., Ossowski, S., Noriega, P. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III. COIN 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4870. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79003-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79003-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79002-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79003-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics