Skip to main content

Automated Knowledge Acquisition by Relevant Reasoning Based on Strong Relevant Logic

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2773))

Abstract

Almost all existing methodologies and automated tools for knowledge acquisition are somehow based on classical mathematical logic or its various classical conservative extensions. This paper proposes a new approach to knowledge acquisition problem: automated knowledge acquisition by relevant reasoning based on strong relevant logic. The paper points out why any of the classical mathematical logic, its various classical conservative extensions, and traditional relevant logics is not a suitable logical basis for knowledge acquisition, shows that strong relevant logic is a more hopeful candidate for the purpose, and establishes a conceptional foundation for automated knowledge acquisition by relevant reasoning based on strong relevant logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A.R., Belnap Jr., N.D.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, A.R., Belnap Jr., N.D., Dunn, J.M.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. II. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, J.: Logical Tool of Knowledge Engineering: Using Entailment Logic rather than Mathematical Logic. In: Proc. ACM 19th Annual Computer Science Conference, pp. 228–238. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, J.: The Fundamental Role of Entailment in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Journal of Computing and Information 2(1), Special Issue: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Computing and Information. Waterloo, pp. 853-873 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, J.: EnCal: An Automated Forward Deduction System for General-Purpose Entailment Calculus. In: Terashima, N., Altman, E. (eds.) Advanced IT Tools, Proc. IFIP World Conference on IT Tools, IFIP 1996 − 14th World Computer Congress, pp. 507–514. CHAPMAN & HALL, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, J.: A Strong Relevant Logic Model of Epistemic Processes in Scientific Discovery. In: Kawaguchi, E., Kangassalo, H., Jaakkola, H., Hamid, I.A. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XI, pp. 136–159. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz, M.R.: Topics in the Logic of Relevance. Philosophia Verlag, Munchen (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, J.M., Restall, G.: Relevance Logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol. 6, pp. 1–128. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Godel, K.: Russell’s Mathematical Logic. In: Schilpp (ed.): The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D.A., Lenat, D.B. (eds.): Building Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kneale, W., Kneale, M.: The Development of Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mares, E.D., Meyer, R.K.: Relevant Logics. In: Goble, L. (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic, pp. 280–308. Blackwell, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Read, S.: Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, B.: The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1903, 1938); Norton Paperback edn. Norton, New York London (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sestito, S., Dillon, T.S.: Automated Knowledge Acquisition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarski, A.: Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences, 4th edn Revised. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1941, 1946, 1965, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheng, J. (2003). Automated Knowledge Acquisition by Relevant Reasoning Based on Strong Relevant Logic. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2773. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40803-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45224-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics