Skip to main content

A Case-Based Inquiry into the Decision Model and Notation (DMN) and the Knowledge Base (KB) Paradigm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11092))

Abstract

Modelling decisions in organisations is a challenging task. Deciding which modelling language to use for the problem at hand is a fundamental question. We investigate the Decision Model and Notation (DMN) standard and the IDP knowledge base system (KBS) in their effectiveness to model and solve specific real-life case problems. This paper presents two cases that are solved with DMN and IDP: (1) Income taxation for foreign artists temporarily working in Belgium; and (2) Registration duties when purchasing real-estate in Belgium. DMN is used as a front-end method, assisting the business analyst in the analysis and modelling of the business domain and communication with the domain expert. It is complemented with the representation of the logic in IDP as back-end system, which allows more forms of inference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trunomi: GDPR Portal. https://www.eugdpr.org/

  2. 107th Congress: Public law 107–204. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ204/html/PLAW-107publ204.htm

  3. European Commission: General Product Safety Directive. https://ec.europa.eu/info/general-product-safety-directive_en

  4. Mitra, S., Chittimalli, P.K.: A systematic review of methods for consistency checking in SBVR-based business rules. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1819. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson, M.L., Peterson, J., Rariden, R.L., Sen, R.: Transitioning to a business rule management service model: case studies from the property and casualty insurance industry. Inf. Manag. 47(1), 30–41 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OMG: Decision Model and Notation 1.1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denecker, M., Vennekens, J.: Building a knowledge base system for an integration of logic programming and classical logic. In: Garcia de la Banda, M., Pontelli, E. (eds.) ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5366, pp. 71–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89982-2_12

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasić, F., Devadder, L., Dochez, M., Hanot, J., De Smedt, J., Vanthienen, J.: Challenges in refactoring processes to include decision modelling. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 308, pp. 529–541. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dasseville, I., Janssens, L., Janssens, G., Vanthienen, J., Denecker, M.: Combining DMN and the knowledge base paradigm for flexible decision enactment. In: RuleML 2016 Supplementary Proceedings (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Smedt, J., Hasić, F., vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M., Vanthienen, J.: Towards a holistic discovery of decisions in process-aware information systems. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 183–199. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Horita, F.E., de Albuquerque, J.P., Marchezini, V., Mendiondo, E.M.: Bridging the gap between decision-making and emerging big data sources: an application of a model-based framework to disaster management in brazil. Decis. Support Syst. 97, 12–22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biard, T., Le Mauff, A., Bigand, M., Bourey, J.-P.: Separation of decision modeling from business process modeling using new decision model and notation (DMN) for automating operational decision-making. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Bénaben, F., Picard, W. (eds.) PRO-VE 2015. IAICT, vol. 463, pp. 489–496. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, J., Aghakhani, G., Hasić, F., Serral, E.: An evaluation framework for design-time context-adaptation of process modelling languages. In: Poels, G., Gailly, F., Serral Asensio, E., Snoeck, M. (eds.) PoEM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 305, pp. 112–125. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70241-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasić, F., De Smedt, J., Vanthienen, J.: Augmenting processes with decision intelligence: principles for integrated modelling. Decis. Support Syst. 107, 1–12 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasić, F., De Smedt, J., Vanthienen, J.: An illustration of five principles for integrated Process and Decision Modelling (5PDM). Technical report, KU Leuven (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boumahdi, F., Chalal, R., Guendouz, A., Gasmia, K.: \({\text{ Soa }}^{\rm + d}\): a new way to design the decision in soa-based on the new standard decision model and notation (DMN). Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 10(1), 35–53 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasić, F., De Smedt, J., Vanthienen, J.: A service-oriented architecture design of decision-aware information systems: decision as a service. In: Panetto, H. (ed.) OTM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10573, pp. 353–361. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. de Cat, B., Bogaerts, B., Bruynooghe, M., Denecker, M.: Predicate logic as a modelling language: the IDP system. CoRR abs/1401.6312 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vanthienen, J., Dries, E.: Developments in decision tables: evolution, applications and a proposed standard. DTEW Research report 9227, pp. 1–40 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Silver, B.: DMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos, p. 305 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN) 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vanthienen, J., Dries, E.: Illustration of a decision table tool for specifying and implementing knowledge based systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 3(2), 267–288 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Calvanese, D., Dumas, M., Laurson, Ü., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Teinemaa, I.: Semantics, analysis and simplification of DMN decision tables. Inf. Syst. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Avola for giving us access to their decision management tool and the following case study participants for their assistance with the analysis, interpretation and completion of the case studies: the Belgian industry federation for the arts (oKo), Kunstenloket, and notary Van Pelt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjolein Deryck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Deryck, M., Hasić, F., Vanthienen, J., Vennekens, J. (2018). A Case-Based Inquiry into the Decision Model and Notation (DMN) and the Knowledge Base (KB) Paradigm. In: Benzmüller, C., Ricca, F., Parent, X., Roman, D. (eds) Rules and Reasoning. RuleML+RR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11092. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99906-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99906-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99905-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99906-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics