Skip to main content

Towards a Solution Space for BPM Issues Based on Debiasing Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 308))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3393 Accesses

Abstract

In previous work, we discussed how cognitive biases may lead to issues in the design phases of the business process management lifecycle, such as the development of suboptimal process architectures and incomplete process models, the identification of irrelevant bottlenecks and weaknesses in a process, and the selection and implementation of confirmatory redesigns. This position paper makes a first step towards solving these issues through the use of debiasing techniques. Such techniques can be used to reduce or avoid the cognitive biases that potentially lead to BPM issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.: gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In: ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 140–152 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A.: Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework. Ent. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 129–158 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design space: co-evolution of problem-solution. Des. Stud. 22(5), 425–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumas, M., et al.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadar, I., Soffer, T., Kenzi, K.: The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: an exploratory study. Req. Eng. 19(2), 143–159 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, J., Jackson, M., Laney, R., et al.: Relating software requirements and architectures using problem frames. In: IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 137–144 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lago, P., Van Vliet, H.: Explicit assumptions enrich architectural models. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maclean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V., Moran, T.: Questions, options and criteria: elements of design space analysis. In: Moran, T., Carroll, J. (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use, Ch. 3, pp. 53–106. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maher, M.L., Poon, J., Boulanger, S.: Formalising design exploration as co-evolution: a combined gene approach. Technical report, University of Sydney (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuseibeh, B.: Weaving together requirements and architecture. IEEE Comput. 34(3), 115–119 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poort, E.R., van Vliet, H.: Architecting as a risk- and cost management discipline. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 2–11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Razavian, M., et al.: In two minds: how reflections influence software design thinking. J. Softw. Evol. Process 28(6), 394–426 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Razavian, M., Turetken, O., Vanderfeesten, I.: When cognitive biases lead to business process management issues. In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 147–156. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw, M.: The role of design spaces. IEEE Softw. 29(1), 46–50 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silver, S.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van den Berg, M., Tang, A., Farenhorst, R.: A constraint-oriented approach to software architecture design. In: Proceedings of the QSIC 2009, pp. 396–405 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Vliet, H., Tang, A.: Decision making in software architecture. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 638–644 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Vanderfeesten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Razavian, M., Vanderfeesten, I., Turetken, O. (2018). Towards a Solution Space for BPM Issues Based on Debiasing Techniques. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74029-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74030-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics