Skip to main content

Multi-task Transfer Learning for Timescale Graphical Event Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11726))

Abstract

Graphical Event Models (GEMs) can approximate any smooth multivariate temporal point processes and can be used for capturing the dynamics of events occurring in continuous time for applications with event logs like web logs or gene expression data. In this paper, we propose a multi-task transfer learning algorithm for Timescale GEMs (TGEMs): the aim is to learn the set of k models given k corresponding datasets from k distinct but related tasks. The goal of our algorithm is to find the set of models with the maximal posterior probability. The procedure encourages the learned structures to become similar and simultaneously modifies the structures in order to avoid local minima. Our algorithm is inspired from an universal consistent algorithm for TGEM learning that retrieves both qualitative and quantitative dependencies from event logs. We show on a toy example that our algorithm could help to learn related tasks even with limited data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is another way of representing timescales. \(\mathcal {T} = (0,a], (a,b], (b,c]\) is equivalent to \(v = [0, a, b, c]\).

References

  1. Antakly, D., Delahaye, B., Leray, P.: Graphical event model learning and verification for security assessment. In: Wotawa, F., Friedrich, G., Pill, I., Koitz-Hristov, R., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11606, pp. 245–252. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharjya, D., Subramanian, D., Gao, T.: Proximal graphical event models. In: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31, pp. 8136–8145. Curran Associates, Inc. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caruana, R.: Multitask learning: a knowledge-based source of inductive bias. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 41–48. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chickering, D., Heckerman, D.: Efficient approximation for the marginal likelihood of incomplete data given a Bayesian network. In: UAI 1996, pp. 158–168. Morgan Kaufmann (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dean, T., Kanazawa, K.: A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Comput. Intell. 5(2), 142–150 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunawardana, A., Meek, C.: Universal models of multivariate temporal point processes. In: Gretton, A., Robert, C.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 51, pp. 556–563. PMLR, Cadiz, 09–11 May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, K.: Dynamic Bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Niculescu-Mizil, A., Caruana, R.: Inductive transfer for Bayesian network structure learning. In: Meila, M., Shen, X. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 2, pp. 339–346. PMLR, San Juan, 21–24 March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  9. Niculescu-Mizil, A., Caruana, R.: Inductive transfer for Bayesian network structure learning. In: Guyon, I., Dror, G., Lemaire, V., Taylor, G., Silver, D. (eds.) Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 27, pp. 167–180. PMLR, Bellevue, 02 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nodelman, U., Shelton, C., Koller, D.: Continuous time Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 378–387 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parikh, A.P., Meek, C.: Conjoint modeling of temporal dependencies in event streams. In: UAI Bayesian Modelling Applications Workshop, August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rajaram, S., Graepel, T., Herbrich, R.: Poisson-networks: a model for structured point processes. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, January 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Leray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Monvoisin, M., Leray, P. (2019). Multi-task Transfer Learning for Timescale Graphical Event Models. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Ognjanović, Z. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11726. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29765-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics