Abstract
This paper gives an overview of the way foresight knowledge concerning scientific and technological developments is deliberated in policy. It also offers an approach to assessing the quality of foresight knowledge generated during foresight exercises. Although “foresight knowledge” is a special case, the idea of having a procedure, approach or method available for assessing the quality of knowledge is tempting: foresight knowledge comes from various sources such as different scientific disciplines, normative visions on the future, planning, and scenario’s. It also receives input from different sectors of society, such as industry, academia and civil society. How can we then assess the quality of knowledge inputs from such diverse sources and its implication for foresight exercises? This paper is a first attempt to address this subject matter. We realise that this type of work has not been done before, and we hope therefore that this first attempt will stimulate others to further explore this issue. Since the aim of this paper is to address “knowledge assessment” on “Foresight knowledge”, we will first give an overview of what foresight actually is, before entering into the core issue of the paper – that is, what “knowledge assessment” addresses and where it could intervene in the framework of a Foresight-exercise. It may thereby also clarify the relevance of knowledge assessment beyond the context of foresight knowledge itself; although it will be seen that “foresight” is a particular case for which “knowledge assessment” is required. The first part of the paper is devoted to the deliberation process in the policy context and especially identifies the normative dimensions of such a process and its consequences for knowledge generation. The second part will enter into the issue of knowledge assessment of foresight knowledge. In both parts foresight knowledge is illustrated by reference to issues of sustainable development.
The views expressed here are those of the author and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission
Please use the following formal when citing This chapter: Von Schomberg, R., 2007. in 1FTP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 233, The Information Society: Innovations, I.egitimacy, Ethics and Democracy, eds. P. Goujon, Lavelle, S., Duquenoy, P., Kimppa, K., Laurent, V., (Boston: Springer), pp. 39 56.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achen Thomas (2004), “The normative dimensions of the precautionary principle and its relation to science and risk management decisions”, in: Microscopic Modification and Big Politics Linkoeping Studies in Arts and Science, Vadstena, Sweden.
Von Schonberg René (2002), “The objective of Sustainability. Are we coming closer?”, Working paper number 1 of the Science and Technology Foresight, Unit of DG Research, European Commission, http://www.cordis.lu/foresight/working.htm
Von Schomberg and Baynes (Eds) (2002), “The Erosion of Valuespheres: The Ways in which Society Copes with Scientific, Moral and Ethical Uncertainty State” in: Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas’ Between Fact and Norms, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Von Schonberg René (2000), “The Ethics of Scientists and Engineers: The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology”, in Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers (ed.), Research in philosophy and technology, vol. 20, JAI Press, Amsterdam [etc.] pp. 167–189
Von Schonberg René (2000), “Agricultural Biotechnology in the Trade-Environment Interface: Counterbalancing Adverse Effects of Globalisation”, in D. Barben and G. Abels (eds.), Biotechnologie–Globalisierung-Demokratie, Berlin: Edition Sigma, pp. 111–131
Von Schonberg René (1996), Offentlichkeit als Kontrolle technologischer Innovation“, in: Analyse und Kritik, August 1997, pp. 108–125
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Von Schomberg, R. (2007). From the Ethics of Technology to the Ethics of Knowledge Assessment. In: Goujon, P., Lavelle, S., Duquenoy, P., Kimppa, K., Laurent, V. (eds) The Information Society: Innovation, Legitimacy, Ethics and Democracy In honor of Professor Jacques Berleur s.j.. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 233. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72381-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72381-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72380-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72381-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)