Skip to main content

Anthropomorphic vs. Non-anthropomorphic Software Interface Feedback for Online Systems Usage

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience (UI4ALL 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper answers an important question concerning the effectiveness of anthropomorphic user interface feedback. The issue of effectiveness has been unresolved for some time, despite the efforts of various prominent computer scientists. By means of a carefully controlled tractable experiment, significant statistical evidence has been found to suggest that anthropomorphism at the user interface in the context of online systems usage is more effective than a non- anthropomorphic method of feedback. Furthermore, the results can be generalised to most software systems for online systems usage, thus potentially changing the way user interface feedback is designed, developed and thought about. This will lead to the improvement of user interfaces making them more usable, more effective and more accessible to all. Computer systems are being used more and more, where potentially every household and work environment will have a computer in the near future. Hence making systems accessible to all, including ‘non-traditional’ users is becoming increasingly more important. This research is making a contribution to this general aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, A. Raw Computation. Scientific American. (1999), 281: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan, S. E and Ohaeri, J. O. Effects of Message Style on Users’ Attributions Toward Agents. CHI’ 94 Human Factors in Computing System,. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole, R., D. W. Massaro, et al. New Tools for Interactive Speech and Language Training: Using Animated Conversational Agents in the Classrooms of Profoundly Deaf Children. Method and Tool Innovations for Speech Science Education, London, (1999), Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dertouzos, M. L. The Future of Computing. Scientific American. (1999), 281: 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttag, J. V. Communications Chameleons. Scientific American. (1999), 281: 42,43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IBM, IBM ViaVoice 98 User Guide, IBM, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koda, T. and Maes, P. Agents With Faces: The Effect of Personification. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, (1996), IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koda, T. and Maes, P. Agents With Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents. Proceedings of HCI’ 96, London, (1996), British HCI Group.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maes, P. Agents That Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM. (1994), 37(7): 31–40, 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murano, P. A New Software Agent ‘Learning’ Algorithm. People in Control An International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, UMIST, UK, (2001), IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murano, P. Mapping Human-Oriented Information to Software Agents For Online Systems Usage. People in Control An International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, UMIST, UK, (2001), IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murano, P. Effectiveness of Mapping Human-Oriented Information to Feedback From a Software Interface. 24th International Conference Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nass, C., Steuer, J. et al. Computers are Social Actors. CHI’ 94 Human Factors in Computing Systems-‘Celebrating Interdependence’, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, (1994), ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Resnik, P. V. and Lammers, H. B. The Influence of Self-Esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like Versus Human-Like Computer Feedback. The Journal of Social Psychology. (1986), 6: 761–769

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface-Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zue, V. Talking With Your Computer. Scientific American. (1999), 281: 40,41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murano, P. (2003). Anthropomorphic vs. Non-anthropomorphic Software Interface Feedback for Online Systems Usage. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. UI4ALL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00855-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36572-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics