skip to main content
review-article
Free Access

Future internets escape the simulator

Published:21 May 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Future Internet testbeds permit experiments not possible in today's public Net or commercial cloud services.

References

  1. Anderson, D.G. et al. Accountable Internet Protocol (AIP). ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 38, 4 (2008), 339--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Berman, M. et al. GENI: A federated testbed for innovative network experiments. Computer Networks 61 (2014), 5--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bronzino, F., Nagaraja, K., Seskar, I. and Raychaudhuri, D. Network service abstractions for a mobility-centric future internet architecture. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture, (2013), 5--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fdida, S. et al. FIRE Roadmap Report 1 -- Part II. Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Femminella, M., Francescangeli, R., Reali, G., Lee, J.W. and Schulzrinne, H. An enabling platform for autonomic management of the future internet. IEEE Network 25, 6 (2011), 24--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fu, X., Schulzrinne, H., Bader, A., Hogrefe, D., Kappler, C. and Karagiannis, G. et al. NSIS: A new extensible IP signaling protocol suite. IEEE Communications 43, 10 (2005), 133--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. GENI design principles. Computer 39, 9 (Sept. 2009), 102--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. iLab.t at iMinds; http://www.iminds.be/en/develop-test/ilab-t.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Krishnappa, D.K., Lyons, E., Irwin, D. and Zink, M. Network capabilities of cloud services for a real time scientific application. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on Local Computer Networks, (2012), 487--495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Krishnappa, D., Irwin, D., Lyons, E. and Zink, M. CloudCast: Cloud computing for short-term weather forecasts. Computing in Science & Engineering 15, 4 (2013), 30--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lee, J.W. Towards a Common System Architecture for Dynamically Deploying Network Services in Routers and End Hosts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, M., Agrawal, D., Ganesan, D., Venkataramani, A. and Agrawal, H. Block-switched networks: A new paradigm for wireless transport. In Proceedings of Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation 9, (2009), 423--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liebeherr, J. and El Zarki, M. Mastering Networks: An Internet Lab Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Maccherani, E., Femminella, M., Lee, J., Francescangeli, R., Janak, J., Reali, G., et al. Extending the NetServ autonomic management capabilities using OpenFlow. Network Operations and Management Symposium (2012), 582--585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Marquez-Barja, J.M., Jourjon, G., Mikroyannidis, A., Tranoris, C., Domingue, J. and DaSilva, L.A. FORGE: Enhancing elearning and research in ICT through remote experimentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference. Istanbul, Turkey, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. McLaughlin, D., Pepyne, D., Chandrasekar, V., Brenda Philips, J. K., Zink, M., Droegemeier, K., et al. Short wavelength technology and the potential for distributed networks of small radar system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90, 12 (2009), 1797--1817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nelson, S., Bhanage, G., & Raychaudhuri, D. (2011). GSTAR: Generalized storage-aware routing for MobilityFirst in the future mobile Internet. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture (MobiArch) ACM, New York, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. OpenFlow Ericsson implementation; https://github.com/TrafficLab/of11softswitch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. OpenFlow Specification 1.1; http://archive.openflow.org/documents/openflow-spec-v1.1.0.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Raychaudhuri, D., Nagaraja, K. and Venkataramani, A. MobilityFirst: A robust and trustworthy mobility-centric architecture for the future Internet. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review 16, 3 (2012), 2--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sharma, S., Staessens, D., Colle, D., Pickavet, M. and Demeester, P. OpenFlow: Meeting carrier-grade recovery requirements. Computer Communications 36, 6 (2013), 656--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Somani, N., Chanda, A., Nelson, S.C. and Raychaudhuri, D. Storage aware routing protocol for robust and efficient services in the future mobile Internet. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Communications Conference, FutureNet V Workshop (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Staelens, N., Deschrijver, D., Vladislavleva, E., Vermeulen, B., Dhaene, T. and Demeester, P. Constructing a no-reference H.264/AVC bitstream-based video quality metric using genetic programming-based symbolic regression. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 23, 8 (2013), 1322--1333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Turner, J. and Taylor, D. Diversifying the Internet. In Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference (2005). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Vandenberghe, W., Vermeulen, B., Demeester, P., Willner, A., Papavassiliou, S. and Gavras, A. et al. Architecture for the heterogeneous federation of future Internet experimentation facilities. In Proceedings of the Future Network and Mobile Summit 2013 Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vasseur, J.P., Pickavet, M. and Demeester, P. Network Recovery: Protection and Restoration of Optical, SONET-SDH, IP, and MPLS. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Venkataramani, A., Sharma, A., Tie, X., Uppal, H., Westbrook, D. and Kurose, J. et al. Design requirements of a global name service for a mobility-centric, trustworthy internetwork. Communication Systems and Networks (2013) 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vu, T., Baid, A., Zhang, Y., Nguyen, T.D., Fukuyama, J., Martin, R.P. et al. DMap: A shared hosting scheme for dynamic identifier to locator mappings in the global internet. Distributed Computing Systems (2012), 698--707. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Future internets escape the simulator

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Communications of the ACM
            Communications of the ACM  Volume 58, Issue 6
            June 2015
            94 pages
            ISSN:0001-0782
            EISSN:1557-7317
            DOI:10.1145/2783419
            • Editor:
            • Moshe Y. Vardi
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 May 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • review-article
            • Popular
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDFChinese translation

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format